John Mara says league needs to look at catch, PI rules: PFT

cowboyjoe

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,423
Reaction score
733
John Mara says league needs to look at catch, PI rules
Posted by Darin Gantt on January 15, 2015, 5:30 AM EST
x350-151-e1359058463660.jpg
Getty Images
Jerry Jones isn’t the only NFL owner not happy about the Dez Bryant catch/not catch last weekend.

During an interview with ESPN Radio Wednesday, Giants owner John Mara admitted he was “very uncomfortable” with the ruling that Bryant did not complete a football move. He admitted it was “probably” the right decision, but cast doubt as to whether the rule needed to be enforced that way.

“We have to look at that,” Mara said, via the New York Daily News. “That was very uncomfortable for me watching that play and having it ruled as an incomplete pass. I think it was probably the right call technically, according to the language that was in the rule book, but I really think we need to look at that. . . .


“We had this discussion a few years ago with the Calvin Johnson catch and decided not to make any changes. But I really think we need to discuss that again because I was not happy watching that, because it just didn’t look right
. It looked like it was a catch. But if you go back and look at the language of the rule and read the part about having to control the ball all the way to the ground, you realize that it was probably the right call.
http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.co...-says-league-needs-to-look-at-catch-pi-rules/
“But do we have to tweak the rules a little bit? I think maybe we do.”

That’s not just talk, as Mara is a member of the league’s competition committee.

He also said he’s “starting to think a little bit differently” about reviewing pass interference penalties.

“It’s become such a big call in our game,” Mara said. “It’s such a huge penalty that I’m starting to change my mind about that. I know that’s something that we’re going to discuss at the Competition Committee starting in February. I’m looking forward to that because I think maybe the time has come not only to have that discussion and that debate, but to really think about changing that rule.

“Instant replay was really implemented to try to correct the major calls in a game, and to get the big calls right. Well, there are not too many calls in the NFL bigger than defensive pass interference.”

Mara said he expected the competition committee would likely present a proposal to the owners to vote on in March, so a pair of controversial rules might get some clarity in the near future.
 

LeonDixson

Illegitimi non carborundum
Messages
12,299
Reaction score
6,808
Both of those rules do need some clarity and simplification. Take the freaking judgement out it. If you catch and secure the ball and have full control (not bobbling it) with two feet in bounds, it should be a catch. If it pops out while going to the ground it's a fumble.
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,875
Reaction score
4,079
They need to re-affirm that the initial judgement of the Referee on the field of play has precedence over and above a opinion on a grey area from a remote, faceless person.............until they do that they can pass rule changes till the cows come home, but the process will still be subject to "pollution"
 

65fastback2plus2

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,755
Reaction score
6,564
He only wants it changed now that his team has a receiver capable of making acrobatic catches.

yup. couple it with beckham's tweets and you know he told mara "hey boss, you know we cant be having incomplete called when I do something ridiculous like that"
 

sbark

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,875
Reaction score
4,079
The most important thing is to protect the instant replay system original intention----that the referees judgement on the field a the point of the play is the focal point, and needs undisputable physical evidence to overturn....................not a opinion from up above
 

EST_1986

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,219
Reaction score
14,730
These helmet to helmet, defenseless hits on WR's and QB's, personal fouls, PI;s are so critical and game changing that they have got to be reviewable.
 
Top