FuzzyLumpkins
The Boognish
- Messages
- 36,995
- Reaction score
- 28,207
Hardy took a one year deal because he didn't want the Cowboys Kracken the salary cap.
OK, I'll stop.
I laughed but I cannot like that for it was just so godawful.
Hardy took a one year deal because he didn't want the Cowboys Kracken the salary cap.
OK, I'll stop.
If you're not going to give the player the guaranteed money up front, he's going to want the one year deal. I would have been willing to take the risk with the guaranteed money. He will only get more expensive next year.
How is the cap hit only 2.65m? I can't find details!
If you're not going to give the player the guaranteed money up front, he's going to want the one year deal. I would have been willing to take the risk with the guaranteed money. He will only get more expensive next year.
I have no doubt this was more mutual than one side "winning".
I think this was a situation where you take that risk and give him the long term deal he wants. All that guaranteed money isn't hitting the 2015 cap. I'd gamble on this young elite player now rather than hope I can out bid a number of teams next year.
Geesh, talk about no clue. . .
Greg Hardy signed a 1 year / $11,300,000 contract with the Dallas Cowboys, including an annual average salary of $11,300,000. In 2015, Hardy will earn. Hardy has a cap hit of .
http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/dallas-cowboys/greg-hardy/
So much for morality. Sex sells.
For sure. My problem is that I think our FO may have been too concerned with minimizing risk rather than maximizing reward. I'd have mortgaged a contract or two in order to offer this guy significant guaranteed money. In return, he'd likely have been willing to lock up for a few more years at a lesser rate than what it will cost us to extend once he goes out and does what we all expect him to do.