Zimmy Lives
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 9,165
- Reaction score
- 4,631
After reading Stashs' post I'm depressed. We suck.
I think your post is well reasoned, but I'm just not sure about part of it. If you look at Minnesota's defense I think most would agree that it is, statistically speaking, one of the tougher defenses in the NFL, and most would say top 5. I think the eyeball test also supports that, to an extent.
I really thought our offensive play calling was pretty suspect last night. I realize when plays don't get positive yardage that they look bad, but I thought conceptually we did a poor job of attacking them.
I think the coaching staff was too unimaginative in their play calling. Having said all of the above, it would have been good enough if we had not had all the penalti and the score might have been more in our favor.
You can be happy we won, and still be troubled by what we've seen, and be objective about our weaknesses.
They aren't mutually exclusive
After reading Stashs' post I'm depressed. We suck.
Nah, you're not alone. That wasn't one of those wins where we shouldn't critique it. lolThanks for pointing that out. I thought I was alone.
After reading Stashs' post I'm depressed. We suck.
I think the lack of pass rush is what's going to hurt us in the playoffs. If we let some of these top-tier quarterbacks just sit in the pocket, they will pick us apart. At this rate we cannot afford to have an off night at all by our offense.
Nah, you're not alone. That wasn't one of those wins where we shouldn't critique it. lol
I can't believe it. I've become a homer.
If you want to feel better about stash ability to read tea leaves, go back to his posts from the start of the season where he's certain we don't have the coaching staff to develop a QB. We're all fallible, with the possible exception of me.
If you want to feel better about stash ability to read tea leaves, go back to his posts from the start of the season where he's certain we don't have the coaching staff to develop a QB. We're all fallible, with the possible exception of me.
I'm sorry that's what you misinterpreted from it.
Can someone explain to me why Whitehead is still on this team? What does he provide to this team?
No worries, Stash; I get why you're venting. I was just trying to enjoy 11-1 even though the Boys played a sucky game and most of the players mentioned in your post were a big part of it.
And me.
Yeah, you're the guy with all of the correct answers. We should all copy off of your paper. I'm looking but I can't find the post where you called any of this either...
Ultimately, it *was* good enough, but it definitely was the best defensive performance against us since at least the PHI game. They get good S play, bring pressure off of both edges, have a legit cover CB they can man up on your best WR, have an absolute beast at LB in Kendricks, and then bring blitz pressure up the interior that actually gets there against most teams. I'd argue that the problem for the offense last night was the penalties a lot more than it was the play calling. And that the penalties were mostly a function of their pressure.
Against other defenses, we can overcome 1st and 20 more often than we should be able to. That wasn't close to happening too often last night. There were some ricky-tacky calls from an overactive officiating crew, but we had 10 penalties last night. We ended one drive with a turnover, and another with a bungled Center-QB exchange. You just don't get that many chances against an elite defense to blow them on miscues and execution errors.