Opening for Elliott? NFL investigator Kia Roberts recommended no suspension **merged**

They could have done it with the Giants kicker and gave him 1 game. Backlash was so bad Giants cut him.

Which is what leads to this. If they had made an example of Bryant, which would have been justified, they could have treated Elliott fairly.
 
How is this not a CBA violation?

Goddell says screw the investigation report, I am suspending anyways. Does the CBA really give the Commish this kind of power?
But that information was not even allowed in the report, the lead investigators recommendations were suppressed, which makes this much worse, especially when not allowed to attend the meeting. This is far worse than not heeding a recommendation.
 
By Clarence E. Hill Jr.

[email protected]

August 31, 2017 7:32 PM


After more than 25 hours of discussion, including Ezekiel Elliott testifying in his own defense, the hearing to appeal a six-game suspension of the Dallas Cowboys star running back for violating the league’s personal conduct policy finally ended Thursday afternoon.

Now the wait begins for NFL arbitrator Harold Henderson to issue a decision on whether to uphold the suspension, reduce it or vacate it entirely.

Elliott’s hope of a significant reduction or success in federal count were improved during the proceedings that began on Tuesday, according to a source.


Read more here: http://www.star-telegram.com/sports/nfl/dallas-cowboys/article170603722.html#storylink=cpy
Reckless disregard for the truth and a reckless disregard for Elliot and his name. No matter what Zeke should sue for slander against the NFL
 
That's what I took from it as well.

As I said from the beginning, we knew these advisers were not on the up-and-up when Peter Harvey stated that Tiffany Thompson was the only eyewitness here.







YR
Is there a link to that Peter Harvey interview??
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
464,617
Messages
13,822,398
Members
23,781
Latest member
Vloh10
Back
Top