Actually, it appears to be worse than disregarding a recommendation. The findings and recommendation by their own appointed investigator was being suppressed. The information was not allowed in the report and the investigator was barred from being at the meeting. I'm not an attorney, but that seems to be a suppression of information and a much more serious issue than simply listening to someone's recommendation. Especially since the investigator was the only person to actually interview the accuser.
Meanwhile back at the NFL League Offices in New York........