All in for Josh Gordon

No risk no reward

Huge risk for little reward. We have seen good teams succeed without a great wide receiver. His impact would not be worth the potential and likely headache. And that is assuming he does play at a high level. He may not be great. He has missed out on quite a bit of development that wide receivers need.
 
Huge risk for little reward. We have seen good teams succeed without a great wide receiver. His impact would not be worth the potential and likely headache. And that is assuming he does play at a high level. He may not be great. He has missed out on quite a bit of development that wide receivers need.

What teams have succeeded in recent memory with receivers as bad as the cowboys?

Don’t say patriots either, they have had good receivers every year.
 
What teams have succeeded in recent memory with receivers as bad as the cowboys?

Don’t say patriots either, they have had good receivers every year.

Dallas receivers are not bad. They are good. They aren't the best, but they are hardly bad. They are better than the receiving corp the Seahawks had when Seattle made it to 2 Superbowls.
 
If he failed again it would be after Oct., not in April.

https://www.___GET_REAL_URL___/www....nt-nfl-jerry-jones/1ffu6x97lv65h1ghpiw38ylc1c

So the report from April, 2017 was false?

Applying for reinstatement doesn’t necessarily mean he hasn’t failed a drug test since his 1 year suspension was announced in January, 2017.
 
So the report from April, 2017 was false?

Applying for reinstatement doesn’t necessarily mean he hasn’t failed a drug test since his 1 year suspension was announced in January, 2017.
If one media outlet reported it in April, others (especially local) would reference that in the dozen or so reports on the issue that were more recent.
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,437
Messages
13,874,493
Members
23,791
Latest member
mashburn
Back
Top