How much will it cost to re-sign Prescott, Elliott?

Cowboy Brian

@BrianLINY
Messages
15,872
Reaction score
5,059
Given the ridiculous contracts QB's are demanding, I don't think we can keep Prescott for less than 27.5mn a year over 6 years.

Elliott may be a bit cheaper, but if he crushes it this year and returns to all-pro form without the lingering suspension we very well may be unable to afford to re-sign both.
 
What ever one they decide to keep, make sure the replacement for the other is already on the roster.
 
What ever one they decide to keep, make sure the replacement for the other is already on the roster.
assuming they will both be at the top of their games when resignings are due, it will have to be dak. franchise qb's are much more rare than outstanding rb's. sure would be nice to keep both.
 
Dak is in the "prove it" year of his contract but he isn't getting top QB money without being one.

I might, might, get the option year on Elliott and pick up another RB in the 2019 draft. RB is one of those positions I would never have in a 2nd contract, there are too many good ones and if a team has a good OL, no need to pay top dollar for that position.
 
I think you're jumping the gun on this one. Dak has to prove he's good enough to get that type of money, and Zeke still has to prove he can keep a clean image off the field.

Either way if these guys are performing Jerry will get them their money, he always does. The cap is something I just don't worry about anymore. Contracts are constantly being manipulated to make things work. I care much more about who we have on the roster than how much they are paid.
 
I hate the cap. We all want our players to do well but when they do it stresses the cap situation. Things were much simpler back in the day when the only thing you had to worry about was performance and health. And I was better looking back then too:laugh:
 
I think you're jumping the gun on this one. Dak has to prove he's good enough to get that type of money, and Zeke still has to prove he can keep a clean image off the field.

Either way if these guys are performing Jerry will get them their money, he always does. The cap is something I just don't worry about anymore. Contracts are constantly being manipulated to make things work. I care much more about who we have on the roster than how much they are paid.
LMAO at your avatar, that's great.
 
Zeke is under contract for 3 more years.

They could also use the franchise tag on him beyond that.

So the cowboys have the ability to keep Zeke locked up for 4 more years without having to keep him signed long term.

No need to worry about Zekes contract right now.

As for Dak. I am obviously a believer in Dak. But they need to make him prove it over the next 2 seasons before offering any type of contract.
 
Given the ridiculous contracts QB's are demanding, I don't think we can keep Prescott for less than 27.5mn a year over 6 years.

Elliott may be a bit cheaper, but if he crushes it this year and returns to all-pro form without the lingering suspension we very well may be unable to afford to re-sign both.
That question could vary drastically for Dak based on the results of this season. He could play really well but without support by teammates for a winning season, his market value will be limited.

Dak could also just be good enough and but win big like in 2016 and his market value would still skyrocket.

With Elliott, the Cowboys have a 5th year option and could Franchise him a couple of times then move on. By then he would be at the age and number of carries where RBs start to really decline.

The tag amount for RBs is several million less than for DEs.
 
Who says Dak or Zeke for that matter, will be re-signed?


Its too early to say

Exactly, we have no idea what will happen in the next 2-3 seasons. Will Dak continue to struggle? If so, we'll probably have a new QB by then. We don't know the future. There's no way to tell what will happen. Our only hope is to build this team around what we have now.
 
Agree that it’s too early to make any hard predictions, but the play-calling could affect the individual stats of both players in a big way.

For instance, if Garrett/Linehan decide that the best way to move the chains with Dak at QB is by mixing in more RPOs on 1st and 2nd downs, and they’re reasonably successful, then 1) Dak likely won’t be asked to throw downfield as much and therefore 2) Zeke may not get the carries he needs to put up really big yardage.

IMHO, we know what we have in Zeke. The X-factor is, if/when Dak improves his ability to consistently throw downfield with accuracy.
 
Exactly, we have no idea what will happen in the next 2-3 seasons. Will Dak continue to struggle? If so, we'll probably have a new QB by then. We don't know the future. There's no way to tell what will happen. Our only hope is to build this team around what we have now.

And, what we HAVE is an offense capable of the WCO with a few more pieces. What we NEED offensively is a deep threat. Thus, we need to draft or sign one. Dak can deliver a deep ball, but, how do you deliver a deep ball when you don't have a reliable deep threat? Dak's game is the quick game, and our offense is a run-balanced style. So, as I've said on other threads, why not incorporate it into a run balanced WCO like Linehan sort of did in Dak's rookie year? Let's take a look at the receivers we DO have. Dez CAN be a good WCO WR (if we keep him). Use him like the 49ers used TO. Dez is, after all, very similar to TO. In fact, I'd say he's more similar to TO than Irvin (which he was billed as early in his career as I recall, hence the 88). Indeed, I think we used him wrong. Don't treat him like Irvin. Instead, he should've been used like TO. That was the more accurate comparison. And I don't mean in terms of his mentality (though, one COULD argue that he's like TO there as well). Instead, his skills are very TO like.

Of course, if we should choose that Dez's services are no longer required, then I also like Noah Brown. With a bit more training, he could really develop into a very similar style WR to Dez or TO. Again, the same logic would apply without us skipping a beat. He looked like a physical chap when he had the ball. I think Zeke was on to something with him.

We also have Beasley who can really help Dak in quick passes (and i'm surprised he wasn't used more). We have Witten who's always a good option on check downs. We, of course, have Zeke when he's not in trouble (to be clear, the DV stuff I still argue was bogus, BUT some of the other stuff does raise red flags for me). That obviously is huge in the run game, but will he have learned his lesson from the suspension? On top of that, we have Switzer who, with more training, gives us 2 Beasleys.

Then, of course, there's Zeke. Will he be able to stay out of trouble? If he does, we have not only one of the best backs in the league, but we also have a player that has yet to reach his full potential. Remember what he did with the ball in Pittsburgh on the screen pass? Yes, we need to do THAT more. Not just use him in the running game and the blocking. He can be dynamic if given the short passes. Use the short passes and ground game to set up the play action deep ball. The PA is, after all, a WCO staple.

The two things I can see though are 1. A deep threat WR who can be used to take pressure off of Dak and focus off of Zeke. 2. A Dunbar/Sproles-type back. Use those kinds of backs to go horizontally on the field. Essentially (as a chess player), use them as a bishop and a knight. You have the queen in Zeke. The King in Dak. The rooks in Dez and Beasley. The Dunbar/Sproles-type back would basically be the bishop. Not exactly someone that will checkmate the opposing defense. But, they can chew up the board and support the queen. Then, your deep threat would be your knight capable of checkmating the team and really putting the opposition in problematic situations. After all, football is like a game of chess.
 

Staff online

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
474,354
Messages
14,532,263
Members
24,210
Latest member
Jtom95
Back
Top