Torturedcowboysfan
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 681
- Reaction score
- 309
id rather trade for him than draft Ridley. They’re about the same age, but Bryant is cheaper and proven.
Correction, Bryant will be 27 in December.id rather trade for him than draft Ridley. They’re about the same age, but Bryant is cheaper and proven.
That’s why you only trade a 4thbut isn't he one more positive drug test away from a 1 year susp?
4th? too high imoThat’s why you only trade a 4th
but isn't he one more positive drug test away from a 1 year susp?
Dez for Martavious.id rather trade for him than draft Ridley. They’re about the same age, but Bryant is cheaper and proven.
I’ll trade r will and a pick. Dez is still good. He has a inaccurate q.v.Dez for Martavious.
Even if Martavious is banned for life I'll still make the trade.
I'll throw in TWill if needed.
![]()
Dez and M Bryant would be a lethal combination. He has moss like skills. He hasn’t peaked yet.
Dez and M Bryant would be a lethal combination. He has moss like skills. He hasn’t peaked yet.
But m Bryant is proven.IF the contract is small, I'm down. But, we have to be able to get out of the contract if he should relapse. Frankly, I'd rather draft St. Brown in round 3. He'd be a BEAST with Dez assuming Dez stays. If not, St. Brown would still be a good move.
But m Bryant is proven.
Why not trade for Bryant and still draft him?
I don't want to give up a pick for him unless it's our second 5th comp or our 6th comp pick. I would prefer a player for player trade. I'd rather go Butler for M. Bryant. I think that would be a move that the Steelers could go for.
Butlers a free against and you won’t get him for a 6 th. You have to offer something the other team actually wants. Keep in mind that their goal is to improve their team too not help the cowboys.I don't want to give up a pick for him unless it's our second 5th comp or our 6th comp pick. I would prefer a player for player trade. I'd rather go Butler for M. Bryant. I think that would be a move that the Steelers could go for.
Again, butlers a free agent and m Bryant is better and younger.Here's the other part of my logic for trading Butler away. Even if we lose Dez, we would still have a boat load of WRs, assuming we draft another WR or get M. Bryant. Not to mention that we usually wind up with at least 5 UDFA WRs. Therefore, I think a Butler for Bryant trade would be better. It benefits us because we get a receiver and our WR depth isn't overly crowded. The Steelers are benefited because they still get a pretty good WR out of it.
Again, butlers a free agent and m Bryant is better and younger.
Butlers a free against and you won’t get him for a 6 th. You have to offer something the other team actually wants. Keep in mind that their goal is to improve their team too not help the cowboys.
I’d trade a conditional 4th. If he ends up suspended, it becomes a 5th.Oh, didn't realize that in Butler's case.
I know, and we have a few other players that may be useful to them. Though, if we're looking at giving up a pick, we have 2 5s. I'd rather give up one of those picks if a 6 wouldn't be sufficient, but I'm not going higher for him if I were Jerry.
I’m certain he gets 1000 yards if he starts 16 games.I’d trade a conditional 4th. If he ends up suspended, it becomes a 5th.