I don't think J.Daniels is strong enough to excel at G

tm1119

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,737
Reaction score
10,221
...at least in the short term. Not saying he can't play the position either, I just think he's a MUCH better C prospect than G. He excels in space and on the move, perfect as a C for a team that runs a zone scheme or a team that uses a lot of screens and gadget plays. He actually reminds me of a bigger Jason Kelce...which should be a compliment. When on the move he's damn near great, but when asked to sit and anchor I think he's only so so. And obviously he's going to have to go 1 on 1 with bigger, stronger DT's on a consistent basis in the NFL. I actually think it would be a disservice to stick this kid at G, he's a pure C.

If we want to throw up the white flag and go safe with guard at 19 I think Hernandez is the pick. You know what he is and he's about as safe a plug and play day 1 starter as you can get. With that said, I don't want a G at 19 and definitely not Daniels
 
He’s got the size and athleticism to be a great guard.

Needs to hit the weights though.

He’s the 3rd youngest player in the draft.
 
...at least in the short term. Not saying he can't play the position either, I just think he's a MUCH better C prospect than G. He excels in space and on the move, perfect as a C for a team that runs a zone scheme or a team that uses a lot of screens and gadget plays. He actually reminds me of a bigger Jason Kelce...which should be a compliment. When on the move he's damn near great, but when asked to sit and anchor I think he's only so so. And obviously he's going to have to go 1 on 1 with bigger, stronger DT's on a consistent basis in the NFL. I actually think it would be a disservice to stick this kid at G, he's a pure C.

If we want to throw up the white flag and go safe with guard at 19 I think Hernandez is the pick. You know what he is and he's about as safe a plug and play day 1 starter as you can get. With that said, I don't want a G at 19 and definitely not Daniels

I take Daniels on potential alone.

Hernandez is what he is and I wonder about his pass blocking.
 
I feel like Daniels will get through his 1st year and be decent but will look a lot better year 2 when he’s added some power.

With Frederick and Tyrone beside him, you can probably help him out against bull rush guys a bit and he’s a nightmare when we pull a guard and bounce Zeke outside.

But the raw power isn’t there at the moment and he’s not helping us at 4th and 1 on the goal line like Hernandez would. Tempting but I’d wait til the 2nd.
 
...at least in the short term. Not saying he can't play the position either, I just think he's a MUCH better C prospect than G. He excels in space and on the move, perfect as a C for a team that runs a zone scheme or a team that uses a lot of screens and gadget plays. He actually reminds me of a bigger Jason Kelce...which should be a compliment. When on the move he's damn near great, but when asked to sit and anchor I think he's only so so. And obviously he's going to have to go 1 on 1 with bigger, stronger DT's on a consistent basis in the NFL. I actually think it would be a disservice to stick this kid at G, he's a pure C.

If we want to throw up the white flag and go safe with guard at 19 I think Hernandez is the pick. You know what he is and he's about as safe a plug and play day 1 starter as you can get. With that said, I don't want a G at 19 and definitely not Daniels

I think a guard at two is doable, OR a tackle guard..I just want one we can stick out with smith that knows how to block for the zone, and keep pressure of of Dak..So he can shut the haters up..Last year was a joke..And the FO was the reason..They need to fix it and Shut up!
 
I'd be glad to take him at 19. That kind of movement in an offensive lineman is very, very hard to find. As much as we run and as much as we pull, I think we could really use him.
 
I feel like Daniels will get through his 1st year and be decent but will look a lot better year 2 when he’s added some power.

With Frederick and Tyrone beside him, you can probably help him out against bull rush guys a bit and he’s a nightmare when we pull a guard and bounce Zeke outside.

But the raw power isn’t there at the moment and he’s not helping us at 4th and 1 on the goal line like Hernandez would. Tempting but I’d wait til the 2nd.

WE need a good one..To me its the key position in this draft..Yes i want to finish the defense, but it all starts with plugging the hole at guard...My take!
 
He’s got the size and athleticism to be a great guard.

Needs to hit the weights though.

He’s the 3rd youngest player in the draft.
If you are saying he needs to hit the weights, he isnt our guy..
 
I'd be happy if he were the pick. Scouts say he excels at getting to the second level. That said I doubt he is the pick.
 
Danielz..If he isnt going to drop that far, why are we talking about him? No body on this forum thinks taking a gd at 19 is wise..

I Still have no issues with it, coz the stupidity of last year, melts away, not to mention we still have to integrate and find ways to manufacture a passing game with two new receivers, and hopefully we start preparing for Witten to retire..Lol
 
...at least in the short term. Not saying he can't play the position either, I just think he's a MUCH better C prospect than G. He excels in space and on the move, perfect as a C for a team that runs a zone scheme or a team that uses a lot of screens and gadget plays. He actually reminds me of a bigger Jason Kelce...which should be a compliment. When on the move he's damn near great, but when asked to sit and anchor I think he's only so so. And obviously he's going to have to go 1 on 1 with bigger, stronger DT's on a consistent basis in the NFL. I actually think it would be a disservice to stick this kid at G, he's a pure C.

If we want to throw up the white flag and go safe with guard at 19 I think Hernandez is the pick. You know what he is and he's about as safe a plug and play day 1 starter as you can get. With that said, I don't want a G at 19 and definitely not Daniels

I think you can look back in a year or two and laugh because he's likely to get much bigger. He is only 20.

Look at Tyron now and look back at people saying he was too lightweight.
 
Once again, If he is not ready to play, he is not plug and play!
 
Once again, If he is not ready to play, he is not plug and play!

I think you’re getting a 6/10 Guard year 1 and a 8.5/10 after that. M.Martin is a 3/10 W.Hernandez a 7.5/10.

I can wear one mediocre year because I think he’s a stud after that.
 
I think Wynn is the better option. I think he is plug and play at guard and can fill in at Tackle if you need him to.
 
I think Wynn is the better option. I think he is plug and play at guard and can fill in at Tackle if you need him to.

Except he had surgery on his labrum (shoulder) which from what I can tell means he’ll miss the start of the season with a likely return date as early/mid October.
 
21 reps with 33 1/2 arms. Pick a G R3-5 like Austin Corbett who may be able to play OT which he played in college.
 
...at least in the short term. Not saying he can't play the position either, I just think he's a MUCH better C prospect than G. He excels in space and on the move, perfect as a C for a team that runs a zone scheme or a team that uses a lot of screens and gadget plays. He actually reminds me of a bigger Jason Kelce...which should be a compliment. When on the move he's damn near great, but when asked to sit and anchor I think he's only so so. And obviously he's going to have to go 1 on 1 with bigger, stronger DT's on a consistent basis in the NFL. I actually think it would be a disservice to stick this kid at G, he's a pure C.

If we want to throw up the white flag and go safe with guard at 19 I think Hernandez is the pick. You know what he is and he's about as safe a plug and play day 1 starter as you can get. With that said, I don't want a G at 19 and definitely not Daniels

IMO, it really comes down to what you want to do offensively.

Tom Landry used smaller, quicker OL who could pull and trap. Tony Dorsett was phenomenal in space, so they were constantly running traps, draws, and screens--all kinds of things to get Dorsett in space. In order to do that, you needed OL who could move.

Jimmy Johnson had Emmitt Smith who was phenomenal between the tackles. Johnson used big powerful OL, and attacked defenses that way.

What makes sense with Ezekiel Elliot?
 
IMO, it really comes down to what you want to do offensively.

Tom Landry used smaller, quicker OL who could pull and trap. Tony Dorsett was phenomenal in space, so they were constantly running traps, draws, and screens--all kinds of things to get Dorsett in space. In order to do that, you needed OL who could move.

Jimmy Johnson had Emmitt Smith who was phenomenal between the tackles. Johnson used big powerful OL, and attacked defenses that way.

What makes sense with Ezekiel Elliot?

EE was statistically same inside and outside last year. But we have huge OL who can pull, too. They have Trey Williams to play the scatback on third although EE is good on third downs. EE isn't as fast as Trey Williams though.
 

Latest posts

Forum statistics

Threads
475,613
Messages
14,626,834
Members
24,220
Latest member
Wineorange
Back
Top