T.O has a point here regardless of JG success

[Diehardblues]

Me and many other people are perfectly capable of analyzing good players on bad teams and bad players on winning teams. Admittedly, you struggle with that. No big deal. Some understand the game, some dont.

Worship all you want but I’m going to call it like I see it.

If I’m such an idiot why do you waste your time?

 

[Diehardblues]

So if Dak wins a SB, then he was good enough to overcome the horrid Garrett. But then Garrett will now be considered a great coach because he won it? So then you would be wrong about Dak having to be good enough to over come Garrett?

You logic completely contradicts itself. Nothing logical about it.

My opinion can change from year to year based on the results.

Not interested in being right I just want to win.If Dak can do that I’m on board despite whatever weaknesses he has.

 

[Captain-Crash]

Jason is my hero. How can I get a job making millions and not have to be any good at the job or have any consequences for not succeeding.

 

[Plankton]

This was all explain in that Super Bowl XLV pregame round table. During that discussion both Aikman and Emmitt thanked Jones for interfering for them. I had this and put it on a DVD but I lent it to a friend years later and when it came back it was scratched and wouldn't play and I no long had the .AVI file to burn another DVD. Because of that when a friend asks me to see a DVD I burn another copy so if it gets wrecked I still have the original. I've searched for that round table many times and haven't been unable to find the entire thing. I've found videos of 2 or 3 minutes of it but this lasted about 12-14 minutes.
.

This is a complete and utter fabrication. What you are stating never happened. Here's the pregame segment on the Cowboys of the 90s. What you claim was never discussed.

 

[Coy]

Can’t wait for Garrett to be fired, just being honest, he sucks.

 

[SoupcanSam]

Can’t wait for Garrett to be fired, just being honest, he sucks.

He really does

 

[buybuydandavis]

TO is bitter towards Garrett? Yes, the hall of fame legend is bitter towards that loser. Ok. Yet he has nothing but good things to say about Romo.

TO made accurate observations. People got so annoyed with with he said because he was accurate.

 

[Alexander]

This is a complete and utter fabrication. What you are stating never happened. Here's the pregame segment on the Cowboys of the 90s. What you claim was never discussed.

Just bumping.

 

[PA Cowboy Fan]

Just bumping.

All I heard was Troy wants Jimmy in the ROH. I agree. lol

 

[stilltheguru88]

TO made accurate observations. People got so annoyed with with he said because he was accurate.

MOST of us know this. TO is a smarter football mind than Jason Garrett. He respects coaches that know as much or more than him (Andy Reid, Parcells). Even though bill hated him, TO never said anything bad about Parcells because there was a level of respect even though bill was disrespecting him.

 

[Diehardblues]

MOST of us know this. TO is a smarter football mind than Jason Garrett. He respects coaches that know as much or more than him (Andy Reid, Parcells). Even though bill hated him, TO never said anything bad about Parcells because there was a level of respect even though bill was disrespecting him.

Garrett is a walk around GM. The criticism for his coaching skills are valid . He’s just trying to hold it together until Jerry passes.

Jerry needs a HC that won’t hog the credit if we win it again.

 

[gjkoeppen]

This is a complete and utter fabrication. What you are stating never happened. Here's the pregame segment on the Cowboys of the 90s. What you claim was never discussed.

This isn't the ENTIRE pregame round table. This is a compilation with parts of it. The real entire round table that was live didn't have any parts where they had prerecorded interviews. I've found this thing before and IT'S NOT what was aired as the pregame round table. It's about as long as the original but much of it has been cut away and replaced with those prerecorded interviews.
.

 

[Plankton]

This isn't the ENTIRE pregame round table. This is a compilation with parts of it. The real entire round table that was live didn't have any parts where they had prerecorded interviews. I've found this thing before and IT'S NOT what was aired as the pregame round table. It's about as long as the original but much of it has been cut away and replaced with those prerecorded interviews.
.

This is exactly what ran on the Fox pregame that day. It’s not a compilation. What you are alleging is a complete falsehood. Surely in the age of YouTube and the internet, you should be able to find something that would corroborate what you’re alleging. Of course, being that it didn’t happen, then it wouldn’t be possible.

 

[robbieruff]

TO is bitter towards Garrett? Yes, the hall of fame legend is bitter towards that loser. Ok. Yet he has nothing but good things to say about Romo.

My thoughts exactly. Was TO a butthole at times during his career...without question. But to allow that to dismiss his credentials and credibility (dude HAS a yellow jacket....HELLO?!!!!!!!) to comment on football? Bunch o’ mullarky!?! The dude has every right to comment and be taken seriously.

 

[gjkoeppen]

This is exactly what ran on the Fox pregame that day. It’s not a compilation. What you are alleging is a complete falsehood. Surely in the age of YouTube and the internet, you should be able to find something that would corroborate what you’re alleging. Of course, being that it didn’t happen, then it wouldn’t be possible.

You are WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. Your video IS NOT what aired as part of the pregame for Super Bowl XLV. A lot of it is, but during that live broadcast of that round table discussion it never once aired ANY prerecorded interviews. All that was originally aired always was the live group, no prerecorded interviews. Now in those 5 minutes of prerecorded interviews a lot of things were said. I've found your video before and as soon as I saw the prerecorded interviews I knew it wasn't the entire discussions as it aired on the pregame of Super Bowl XLV. There are many things that aren't available for many reason. I have search the internet for a lot of things that just aren't available. Many times because whoever owns the rights to things find it and make whoever is hosting it remove it as copywrite infringement. So spare us with your age of the internet crap that anything can be found.
.

 

[nightrain]

It boggles T.O.'s mind? How hard can that be?

 

[Plankton]

You are WRONG WRONG WRONG WRONG. Your video IS NOT what aired as part of the pregame for Super Bowl XLV. A lot of it is, but during that live broadcast of that round table discussion it never once aired ANY prerecorded interviews. All that was originally aired always was the live group, no prerecorded interviews. Now in those 5 minutes of prerecorded interviews a lot of things were said. I've found your video before and as soon as I saw the prerecorded interviews I knew it wasn't the entire discussions as it aired on the pregame of Super Bowl XLV. There are many things that aren't available for many reason. I have search the internet for a lot of things that just aren't available. Many times because whoever owns the rights to things find it and make whoever is hosting it remove it as copywrite infringement. So spare us with your age of the internet crap that anything can be found.
.

Surely, then, you can find what you are alleging. All I have seen you do is bloviate and use caps, as if that proves anything. That video that I posted is what aired during Fox’s pregame show for Super Bowl XLV. Beginning to end, with no edits. Provide proof for your claims - surely there would be an article that would outline that Troy Aikman and Emmitt Smith stated that Jerry Jones had to overrule Jimmy Johnson for them to be in Dallas as Cowboys. It’s not like that wouldn’t be a controversial twist in a story that people still can’t stop talking about nearly 25 years since Jones fired Johnson.

But, what you are alleging is a complete and utter falsehood. And, I think you know it. Using the “my dog ate my homework” excuse is rather weak. As is “who are you going to believe - me or your lying eyes?”

 

[CowboyRoy]

Worship all you want but I’m going to call it like I see it.

If I’m such an idiot why do you waste your time?

I never said you were an idiot. Your just a Dak hater. Its difficult to analyze properly when you are biased.

 

[CowboyRoy]

My opinion can change from year to year based on the results.

Not interested in being right I just want to win.If Dak can do that I’m on board despite whatever weaknesses he has.

I am looking for a QB that can win it all when he we have the team around him capable of doing that. Plenty QB's can win the SB with a great team around them. The key is to get that great team around them. Some QB's obviously better than others.

Dak showed me his rookie year what he can do with quality around him. And this was his first year at age 22. Very impressive. No QB's are going to win it all without great players around them. Aikman was a perfect example.

 

[Diehardblues]

I never said you were an idiot. Your just a Dak hater. Its difficult to analyze properly when you are biased.

I’m a critic . I’m calling it like I see it. If he has success this year like in 2016 when he won over the hearts of Cowboys then I won’t be as critical . No one is exempt from criticism. Do haters buy and wear Dak gear?