News: ESPN: The Cowboys' salary-cap mismanagement is wasting Dak Prescott

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,025
Wasting Dak Prescott?!? They spend all this time telling people how bad Prescott is as a QB, and how cheap the FO is because of how much they’re paying him. They criticized Dallas for years for flash moves, style over substance, yada yada yada, so Booger and the Boys decided to build through the draft. Now it’s “they’re cheap” or “they’re wasting so and so”. Now I’m not being a FO apologist—just pointing out the hypocrisy of these ESPNers. Sewing the seeds of discontent in the Cowboys fan base, causing chaos and division, which makes them easier to control and influence. It makes them more fearful, more impressionable, and more submissive. It mirrors what government and media does to the public in general.

I say if Dak continues as is, they need to grab someone in the offseason and let them compete for QB1 next TC.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Is it really cap mismanagement? We will finally be set up next offseason 70 million under the cap so we can make some moves.

Click bait article. Lol
Waiving Romo saved the team 34m in cap space AFTER the DeadMoney
Waiving Dez saved the team 24m in cap space AFTER the Dead Money

the whole premise of the article is wrong

We are 15m under the cap right now and can't spend it and left another 25m on the shelf with DLaw, Tron, SLee and Crawford

Like you said we are 70m under next year and DLaw and Irving are the only 2 big FAs
 

Chuck 54

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,052
Reaction score
12,026
While we all want to win while Dak is on his rookie deal, paying the QB hasn’t stopped other teams from winning. I think we are in a calculated transition period in which the offense will look at stars for next year.

Our recent history shows that we had a franchise QB in Tony Romo. The team paid him generously and restructured, paying him more overall, in order to surround him with other stars on offense. We overpaid Marion Barber. We surrounded him with receivers like Terry Glenn, Terrell Owens, Roy Williams, Dez Bryant, Miles Austin....receivers who were traded for, drafted and eventually paid top dollar to retain. They brought in more TEs in a never ending quest to have more weapons. They drafted RBs. Some moves worked, and some were enormous failures for many reasons. Finally, they used most of their draft capital to build an OL to balance the offense.

What did we get with all these stars on offense? Lots of points and a defense that had almost no talent, no balance, weaknesses exposed in big game after big game and tons of dead money.

Now we have gone ultra cheap on receivers and TE and depth on the OL in order to build a young, legit defense. The final record will pay the price. We have a young team with a young QB and RB surrounded by a weak receiving crew and an OL that is out of sync and weakened up the middle with a backup C and rookie Guard transitioning from OT. I don’t believe Bailey was released only due to his decline, though what’s he doing now? I think we saw a chance to move on with a young up and comer and reduce salary.

If the defense proves to be legit, it will certainly need additions here and there as players leave, but I think we will see draft capital and more action in free agency in 2019 targeting better receivers and OL depth, even a true 3rd down scat back.

It’s a process...hahaha. The process used by JJ throughout Romos career failed because our defense couldn’t stop anyone at crunch time. The process of paying every star or good player top dollar to retain him was a failure...you have to let some guys walk, replace them, and keep both sides of the ball competitive.

Maybe this offense gels if Fredrick returns and Collins improves and Smith stays healthy, while all the new receivers and returners thrust into new roles develop better chemistry and timing with the QB. Dak needs at least initial time to read the defense, avoiding instant pressure off the snap. He probably needs legitimate weapons around him. He’s not a QB who is ready to lead a bunch of nobodies, probably never will be. But he’s a leader and can lead this team to victory. As we dismantled the defense, it took time to rebuild. The offense has the OL starters, the QB and RB. It needs OL depth and playmakers at WR and TE.
 

Awakened

the Dude abides
Messages
1,595
Reaction score
1,227
Waiving Romo saved the team 34m in cap space AFTER the DeadMoney
Waiving Dez saved the team 24m in cap space AFTER the Dead Money

the whole premise of the article is wrong

We are 15m under the cap right now and can't spend it and left another 25m on the shelf with DLaw, Tron, SLee and Crawford

Like you said we are 70m under next year and DLaw is the only big FA
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
Wasting Dak Prescott?!? They spend all this time telling people how bad Prescott is as a QB, and how cheap the FO is because of how much they’re paying him. They criticized Dallas for years for flash moves, style over substance, yada yada yada, so Booger and the Boys decided to build through the draft. Now it’s “they’re cheap” or “they’re wasting so and so”. Now I’m not being a FO apologist—just pointing out the hypocrisy of these ESPNers. Sewing the seeds of discontent in the Cowboys fan base, causing chaos and division, which makes them easier to control and influence. It makes them more fearful, more impressionable, and more submissive. It mirrors what government and media does to the public in general.

I say if Dak continues as is, they need to grab someone in the offseason and let them compete for QB1 next TC.
I’m pretty sure the majority of the criticisms stemmed from the fans and the fact that Jerry would give mediocre and risky players ridiculous contracts that were dumb and financially risky. Most real GM’s have a good balance between FA’s and draft, it seems we’ve usually been one or the other.

I still clearly remember fans applauding Jerry for the way he would work his contracts....until they cost him either through busts or high risk players.

And please stop with the ESPN nonsense. For one we are the most loved or hated team in America (thanks to Jerry) so naturally we will get more attention. Even still it’s not nearly as bad as some ESPN haters (I don’t like them either but it has nothing to do with the Cowboys) make it out to be. If you’d like, I’ll start personally sending you plenty of articles that criticize other teams if it will make you feel better.
 

Doomsday

Rising Star
Messages
19,790
Reaction score
16,074
I wonder if the $17 million CAP hit from Romo retiring played a roll in that
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
Anyways, can anyone tell me where the blame lies? Genuine question. Is Jerry still the “real GM” or is McClay to blame for not getting ET or other FA players in areas of need? What genius thought having scrub TE’s and WR’s would work? Not that it matters if Dak can’t hit the broadside of a barn from 5 feet away.
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,025
I’m pretty sure the majority of the criticisms stemmed from the fans and the fact that Jerry would give mediocre and risky players ridiculous contracts that were dumb and financially risky. Most real GM’s have a good balance between FA’s and draft, it seems we’ve usually been one or the other.

I still clearly remember fans applauding Jerry for the way he would work his contracts....until they cost him either through busts or high risk players.

And please stop with the ESPN nonsense. For one we are the most loved or hated team in America (thanks to Jerry) so naturally we will get more attention. Even still it’s not nearly as bad as some ESPN haters (I don’t like them either but it has nothing to do with the Cowboys) make it out to be. If you’d like, I’ll start personally sending you plenty of articles that criticize other teams if it will make you feel better.

Sorry, but I fear not many Dallas fans will sing the praises of ESPN. Yeah, I’m aware that manufactured drama sells, that the most polarizing team is gonna get worked the most, and that Booger’s meddling and bad deals and dumpster fire events SHOULD be criticized, but I’ve seen them work both sides of the street too many times. It’s like the big, arrogant, greedy, soulless, obscenely wealthy corporate conglomerate that runs commercials claiming to care, complete with corny, over the top cliches. “We’re the warm-n-fuzzy Corporate Giant”!
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,025
Anyways, can anyone tell me where the blame lies? Genuine question. Is Jerry still the “real GM” or is McClay to blame for not getting ET or other FA players in areas of need? What genius thought having scrub TE’s and WR’s would work? Not that it matters if Dak can’t hit the broadside of a barn from 5 feet away.

You’re 100% right. But I think the blame lies in several areas, a combination of variables, and rest assured, ESPN will play all the angle$.
 

Keithfansince5

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,534
Reaction score
5,644
Man if Jerry signs Dak to a huge contract, that could be one of the worst things he will have ever done for this franchise. Dak should be the back up QB not the starter.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
Jerry would give mediocre and risky players ridiculous contracts
MAustin, RWilliams11 and RWilliams31, MBIII, Hamlin, Carr, Free, Ratliff2.0 were the terrible extensions..... most would include TCrawford but I don't

Romo1,2 and 3, DWare, Witten1 and 2, Tron, SLee, TFred, Church were all team friendly

Some good, some bad, some OK

The biggest cap problem came when the Owners held it flat ....it stayed at 123m from 2009 to 2013 and JJones never adjusted...... then he got that 10m penalty when everyone else cleared their cap in 2010.... it had nothing to do with restructures or Dead Money
 

phildadon86

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,759
Reaction score
31,076
He was 33 and had already dealt with a good amount of health issues then we sign him to a 6 year extension. Jerry then tried to sell us that an injury prone QB could play til he was 39 or 40.
Yeah I am in sales and I consider myself pretty good. I didnt believe that for a second.
 
Top