Dak’s stats during our three game win streak

Toruk_Makto

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,231
Reaction score
17,331
And they weren't moving the ball otherwise? Think about that.

Dallas is near the bottom of the league in RAC so Dak hasn't been helped by it overall. Think about that .
To get YAC you either need a wr to make some superhero moves like Amari did yesterday or you need a qb who can hit players in stride and on time and accurately. Does that sound like Dak to you?
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
Which is an advantage for him over Rodgers and Romo, not some kind of detriment. It’s weird to me that Dak slobberers think that sitting on the bench doing nothing is some kind of advantage over not playing and getting experience and developing skills..

I quit reading at "Dak Slobberers". If you argument is that a player's stats are comparable with no preperation against a guy with years of coaching and film/playbook study, I disagree.
 

ConstantReboot

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,222
Reaction score
9,886
It's so odd with Dak, there are times he is frustrating with poor throws or slow reads. Then he dazzles with an amazing play that it seems no other QB can make.

Dak does need work. I admit to that. However, he is a hard worker and wants to keep learning. The big problem is coaching. I don't think he is being coached well. Thus you see these occasional bad passes.

Those all can be worked out in the offseason with good coaching. Just that our coaches don't know how to coach.
 

School

Well-Known Member
Messages
412
Reaction score
496
How does one learn from watching a play by posting
a tweet from Witten, especially since you were just telling me going to walk me “step by step” through it based on the film?

I said how does run or pass blocking indicate RPO, when that is what play-action is built on?

Where is this “step by step” response from the film?
You had no response and searched for a post from Witten where he says it was RPO.

So teach me Yoda from the film.. Show me where it being RPO changed any of the original points, regarding play design by Linehan and the defense focusing in on Zeke and Dak having to make a simple pass.

Again, I was just correcting you. It being an RPO probably helps your point actually, because it was a good call by Linehan.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,546
Reaction score
15,713
They made it to the playoffs with Romo BEFORE the post-season. They weren’t making it to the playoffs with Bledsoe BEFORE the post-season. Parcells has his boys flying down to the stadium to give him support in his state of depression.

But congratulations, you win.. Romo lost the game as a FG holder and NOT the QB, if it makes you feel better. I don’t think when discussing Romo, we are referring to his job as a FG holder though..
Parcells made the playoffs here with Quincy Carter.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,833
Reaction score
34,986
Romo threw for 36 TDs his first full year starting and set all sorts of Cowboy record passing records. Dak in his second full season two, he was throwing Cowboys record pick 6s andgoing scoreless for ten straight quarters and we are currently 0-5 when the offense commits a single TO, while that was never even close to the case with Tony Romo even with Jason Garrett calling the plays.

Dak can’t even overcome a single TO, so him being a checkdown Charlie in his ‘first two seasons’. Romo in ten games starting his first season, without even being the starter in training camp basically had as many TDs as Dak in his full seasons.

Romo had a garbage OL when he started outside his LT, who when he went down in 2005, three of the starting five that played a majority of Romo’s First season gave up over 40 sacks in like ten games.

And Dak’s OL has the best rushing attack and best runner in football.

The usage of stats by Dak slobbers are just nonsensical and establish no context.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,546
Reaction score
15,713
Drew routinely hits players in stride allowing for YAC. Can you say the same for Dak? MR. I need to see a player open before I throw the ball and then often deliver it late or inaccurately.

Is there any 4 game stretch for Brees where 2 throws amount to 18% of his total yardage? Two. Throws.

This comparison is awful.
you are posting complete inane nonsense.
you have exactly zero damn idea how brees has fared with YAC ...ever...
you took one ******** note about dak's yardage and are riding that pony til its back brakes.

that is idioctic on every level.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
Dak does need work. I admit to that. However, he is a hard worker and wants to keep learning. The big problem is coaching. I don't think he is being coached well. Thus you see these occasional bad passes.

The thing I put on coaching is that Dak was solid throwing on the run when rolling out to his right as a rookie, and now he bounces every third pass doing that. I put that on the coaches. But the guys most fans are used to seeing like Romo had years of practice time and coaching before they ever saw the field. And if you look at guys like Drew Brees who started right away, his second season was realy poor too. And guys like David Carr went downhill and never recovered.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,833
Reaction score
34,986
Parcells made the playoffs here with Quincy Carter.

And Parcells in his other three seasons, the more his stamp was left on this organization was a train-wreck of being average, while Parcells just brought in his aged veterans in skill positions to keep them looking worse than they actually were.

Not sure what the point was in this cobtexr of Romo saving Parcells last season from being a joke. Parcells couldn’t even stop a basic screen pass against Kitna and Reggie Bush his fourth year here.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
26,192
Romo threw for 36 TDs his first full year starting and set all sorts of Cowboy record passing records. Dak in his second full season two, he was throwing Cowboys record pick 6s andgoing scoreless for ten straight quarters and we are currently 0-5 when the offense commits a single TO, while that was never even close to the case with Tony Romo even with Jason Garrett calling the plays.

Dak can’t even overcome a single TO, so him being a checkdown Charlie in his ‘first two seasons’. Romo in ten games starting his first season, without even being the starter in training camp basically had as many TDs as Dak in his full seasons.

Romo had a garbage OL when he started outside his LT, who when he went down in 2005, three of the starting five that played a majority of Romo’s First season gave up over 40 sacks in like ten games.

And Dak’s OL has the best rushing attack and best runner in football.

The usage of stats by Dak slobbers are just nonsensical and establish no context.
Your love for Romo is a little disturbing. Which is why it's extremely hypocritical to call anyone a Dak slobberer.
 

Romo_To_Dez

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,323
Reaction score
14,992
And entering the game 2 weeks ago DAL had the least YAC of any team in football.
Hilarious how this works.
You guys wanna remove YAC now but never factored it in before as a reason his yardage totals were low.

This is how QBing works.
Brees has more YAC than any QB in football.
That's why he is on target to be MVP as opposed to all his 8-8 seasons.

All QBs have their stats helped out by YAC. Including Romo. Singling out Dak in this aspect of stats for QBs proves that no matter what he does, some will never be happy and look for something to discredit him.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
Romo threw for 36 TDs his first full year starting and set all sorts of Cowboy record passing records. .

And the fact that two of his three receivers were Pro Bowlers in their primes had nothing to do it. Sure, why not.
 

G2

Taco Engineer
Messages
24,426
Reaction score
26,192
All QBs have their stats helped out by YAC. Including Romo. Singling out Dak in this aspect of stats for QBs proves that no matter what he does, some will never be happy and look for something to discredit him.
Imagine having Owens? Talk about YAC.
 

Super_Kazuya

Well-Known Member
Messages
7,074
Reaction score
9,113
I quit reading at "Dak Slobberers". If you argument is that a player's stats are comparable with no preperation against a guy with years of coaching and film/playbook study, I disagree.
My argument is you’re clueless about what happens in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers was going to be great regardless because he was a first round pick with immense talent, not because he sat around doing nothing for three years. The “film/playbook study” is exactly the same whether you are the starter or the backup. You don’t know what you’re talking about, and I think you are fantasizing that he was attending a football academy or getting special attention from the coaches as an understudy or something equally ludicrous.
 

jterrell

Penguinite
Messages
33,546
Reaction score
15,713
Romo threw for 36 TDs his first full year starting and set all sorts of Cowboy record passing records. Dak in his second full season two, he was throwing Cowboys record pick 6s andgoing scoreless for ten straight quarters and we are currently 0-5 when the offense commits a single TO, while that was never even close to the case with Tony Romo even with Jason Garrett calling the plays.

Dak can’t even overcome a single TO, so him being a checkdown Charlie in his ‘first two seasons’. Romo in ten games starting his first season, without even being the starter in training camp basically had as many TDs as Dak in his full seasons.

Romo had a garbage OL when he started outside his LT, who when he went down in 2005, three of the starting five that played a majority of Romo’s First season gave up over 40 sacks in like ten games.

And Dak’s OL has the best rushing attack and best runner in football.

The usage of stats by Dak slobbers are just nonsensical and establish no context.
Romo was 0-for December in the middle of his career and terrible in his first two playoff games.

He had very real faults.

Being a gunslinger, passing TDs and yardage totals weren't one of them.
But that gun-slinging came with a very real turnover problem.
Live by the gun die by the gun was a very real thing.

Later on after years of film review and study he beat his TO problems but unfortunately his health didn't hold up.
 

khiladi

Well-Known Member
Messages
35,833
Reaction score
34,986
Dak played with the ‘worst’ WRs because the argument was they needed to make it Dak friendly and he was even saying they don’t need a number one WR.

The argument was they didn’t want him forcing the ball, the problem with that, he doesn’t go through his progressions and he only works half the field.

So Dak can hit Cooper as his first read, which was never an issue with Dak in the first place.

Congratulations... Dak hit Cooper as is furst read against a bunch of cover 1, press coverage 8 men in the box, the whole game, where if he was even a good QB, he’d be making defenses pay regularly and not going below 20 points a game regularly and forcing defenses to shift coverage.
 

Kaiser

Well-Known Member
Messages
16,628
Reaction score
28,430
My argument is you’re clueless about what happens in the NFL. Aaron Rodgers was going to be great regardless because he was a first round pick with immense talent, not because he sat around doing nothing for three years.

He was so great he couldn't set foot on the field. And you call others clueless.
 
Top