It's sad, we really have a Superbowl team, 1 position holds us back

[Stash]

With this Defense, Rb, and Wr threat to make teams pay for focusing on Elliot. We are built to win it all.

But the QB position still scares me. Defenses focus on Elliot, which in return allows guys like Cooper, Gallup and Beasley to roam free, and we all see it. But what happens more than half the time?

Dak misses them for big plays. So instead of jumping out to a huge lead, we let teams hang around, scoring FGs with a shaky kicker.

Our D puts the clamps down on other teams, but when our O, mainly Dak gets to dicking around for most of the game, they are bound to break a little. Then like the *******s many of us are, we get mad at the D.

It would be disappointing to have this team and not win it all because of Dak and his inability to consistently burn teams.

With Romo we'd def win. Even Stafford or Carr would get the job done. I don't believe in Daks ability to throw

Is the week after he set career highs in completions, attempts, and yardage going 42 of 54 with 455 yards and 3 TD's the best week to start another Dak bashing thread?

I'm sure there must have been better times to choose from during this season.

 

[Future]

They can absolutely win a Super Bowl with Dak as a QB, flawed as he is.

 

[Aviano90]

Is the week after he set career highs in completions, attempts, and yardage going 42 of 54 with 455 yards and 3 TD's the best week to start another Dak bashing thread?

I'm sure there must have been better times to choose from during this season.

It's the perfect time for the bashing to increase. Can't have any praise going on. People must be reminded that Dak sucks or else they may forget.

 

[noshame]

what holds us back?? Clueless fans with moronic OPs.

 

[Sydla]

Our coach holds us back.

 

[EMMITTnROY]

Garrett?

Linehan?

Jerry?

Rowdy?

Unknown Fan #237?

You happen to be a fan of The Shining, Reality?

 

[DFWJC]

TE?

Never heard of lack of a TE threat being reason a team can't win it all.

Then again, I've also seen teams win it all with lessor QBs than Dak.
Rob Johnson, anyone?

 

[OmerV]

TE?

93 yards from our TE's this past game without a single dropped pass. We just have to throw them the ball and they tend to catch it.

 

[PJTHEDOORS]

It would be disappointing to have this team and not win it all because of Dak and his inability to consistently burn teams.

With Romo we'd def win. Even Stafford or Carr would get the job done. I don't believe in Daks ability to throw

I don't believe...

Exactly why.

 

[Dbeastmode21]

You haters are crazy as hellhow more dak wins how more hates he get.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

They can absolutely win a Super Bowl with Dak as a QB, flawed as he is.

Definitely based on what trash has won Super Bowls....Eli with 2, Flacco, Ben R in his early years, Trent Dilfer.......

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

Troll job from a troll..

 

[Irvin88_4life]

Just so we are clear here

Carr, Stafford, and Romo have a combined 2 playoff wins between 25 seasons

And Romo has both of them

 

[Captain-Crash]

With this Defense, Rb, and Wr threat to make teams pay for focusing on Elliot. We are built to win it all.

But the QB position still scares me. Defenses focus on Elliot, which in return allows guys like Cooper, Gallup and Beasley to roam free, and we all see it. But what happens more than half the time?

Dak misses them for big plays. So instead of jumping out to a huge lead, we let teams hang around, scoring FGs with a shaky kicker.

Our D puts the clamps down on other teams, but when our O, mainly Dak gets to dicking around for most of the game, they are bound to break a little. Then like the *******s many of us are, we get mad at the D.

It would be disappointing to have this team and not win it all because of Dak and his inability to consistently burn teams.

With Romo we'd def win. Even Stafford or Carr would get the job done. I don't believe in Daks ability to throw

 

[Ranching]

With this Defense, Rb, and Wr threat to make teams pay for focusing on Elliot. We are built to win it all.

But the QB position still scares me. Defenses focus on Elliot, which in return allows guys like Cooper, Gallup and Beasley to roam free, and we all see it. But what happens more than half the time?

Dak misses them for big plays. So instead of jumping out to a huge lead, we let teams hang around, scoring FGs with a shaky kicker.

Our D puts the clamps down on other teams, but when our O, mainly Dak gets to dicking around for most of the game, they are bound to break a little. Then like the *******s many of us are, we get mad at the D.

It would be disappointing to have this team and not win it all because of Dak and his inability to consistently burn teams.

With Romo we'd def win. Even Stafford or Carr would get the job done. I don't believe in Daks ability to throw

OL injuries scare me more. Dak would be much more consistent with a cleaner pocket.

 

[QuincyCarterEra]

And Romo has both of them

Correct

 

[Oh_Canada]

Kicker?

 

[BlueStar22]

Eagles won with Nick Foles lmaoooo You think Dak can't make more plays that Nick Foles?

 

[Hook'em#11]

Weird.. Remember reading the same crap about Romo in here years ago. Not from probably the same posters, but, still the same. Not about having a good defense and no QB. But, other weekly , daily whining and crying threads..

 

[Risen Star]

People are so damn eager for the team to fail with Dak. It's like they are foaming at the mouth, ready to pop their champagne, and celebrate.

That's just your immaturity talking.