My thoughts. season over

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,674
Reaction score
15,503
I'm not going to blow up your thread with Dak talk but since it's been brought up already I have to ask this one question before I turn in.

Just how the Hell did Dak keep us from getting blown out? He only managed two scores in 57 minutes while being under little pressure from the Rams D while they focused on stopping Zeke. How is that keeping us from getting blown out?

So did we get blown out or not? Last I checked, Zeke did nothing this game. So then who was it that stopped us? Definitely wasn't the defense. One stop the whole game. Not even one single turnover. No plays made at all.
 

Blackspider214

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,674
Reaction score
15,503
How can I attribute it to Dak? Because his offense was ripping off two 3 & outs, one 4 & out, plus two other scoreless possessions during that stretch. This isn’t “make it, take it” where the Rams got to score then get the ball right back. Dallas could have answered with long scoring drives of their own and it could have been a 10-6 game at half instead of 20-7. Every expert I saw predicted LA would put up around 30 in that game. They average 37 in that building. I’m disappointed that the D let LA run with so much success but I’m just as disappointed that our offense disappeared for so long in a game where it was clear they couldn’t afford to do so.

Hard to put up long drives when the run game gives you zero and your offense is based on the run. Did you expect long drives passing the ball the whole time? That makes no real sense. Tell the OL to handle their business to establish a run game and we could have some long drives. This offense is not designed to sling it around to create long drives.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,809
Reaction score
47,205
How can I attribute it to Dak? Because his offense was ripping off two 3 & outs, one 4 & out, plus two other scoreless possessions during that stretch. This isn’t “make it, take it” where the Rams got to score then get the ball right back. Dallas could have answered with long scoring drives of their own and it could have been a 10-6 game at half instead of 20-7. Every expert I saw predicted LA would put up around 30 in that game. They average 37 in that building. I’m disappointed that the D let LA run with so much success but I’m just as disappointed that our offense disappeared for so long in a game where it was clear they couldn’t afford to do so.
Much of this Offense's failure happened due to this Oline and Zeke's inability to get rushing yards. Hard to keep drives alive and score points when it's hard to convert those 3rd & 7s/8s when you're only picking up 2-3 yards total running the ball on both 1st & 2nd downs.
 

ClintDagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Reaction score
1,632
Maybe tell the defense to make a stop and not let these time consuming drives suck the life out of the game. They gave our offense zero room for error. Dak wasn't perfect but how in the world are people just brushing off this god awful putrid effort from this defense? It started from the opening drive and never stopped. That's high school level stuff you see. Where teams just gash the other with no mercy shown.

Defense had a chance early to make a statement. We went up 7-3. Were hyped up. Defense gets the Rams into a 3rd and 10. And what do they do? Allow an easy 9 yard completion. Then they easily get the 1st down on 4th with a sneak. It's like they weren't even prepared for a sneak. Also, this OL and run game for us was horrendous. A huge letdown. Our offense is based on the OL and Zeke and they did nada. But yes, it's always Dak's fault...
I expected a shootout (if we were going to win), not a 13-10 type game like we pulled off against NO. I’m not saying Dak needed to put up 5 TDs in those drives, just give me 6-10 points. Control the clock for a bit and let the D rest and try to recoup. Something. Anything.
 

Vtwin

Safety third
Messages
8,183
Reaction score
11,169
So did we get blown out or not? Last I checked, Zeke did nothing this game. So then who was it that stopped us? Definitely wasn't the defense. One stop the whole game. Not even one single turnover. No plays made at all.
Any defense can shut down a run game if they have no fear of the passing game and can focus resources on the run game.

Zeke was getting hit in the backfield or at the line constantly.

Dak managed only two scores until the PI put the ball on the one giving him the third.

That's all truth. Good night fellas.
 

ClintDagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Reaction score
1,632
Hard to put up long drives when the run game gives you zero and your offense is based on the run. Did you expect long drives passing the ball the whole time? That makes no real sense. Tell the OL to handle their business to establish a run game and we could have some long drives. This offense is not designed to sling it around to create long drives.
LA game planned to take away the run. You make them pay for doing that through the air and I guarantee you that run game opens up.

And I think this is where the problem lies. The style & personnel type that Dallas plays only really works if you have a top 1 or 2 dominant OL in the league. This OL is probably somewhere around 10th in the league. Good, but not great. Your QB doesn’t have what it takes to carry you for a whole game. He’s a gamer and will come up big at crunch time but there’s still that other 75% of the game to worry about where you need production on the road vs a Rams caliber team.
 

lukin2006

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,966
Reaction score
19,289
I agree. I’m a firm believer that if you want to stop the run at this level, you can. It may leave you extremely vulnerable elsewhere but on Saturday it got to the point that they should said we’re stopping the run no matter what and if you torch us, you torch us. They also should have solved that jet sweep after the 2nd time it hurt them.

Agreed, also by making Goff beat you, there is a possibility of creating an interception and some turnovers.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,809
Reaction score
47,205
LA game planned to take away the run. You make them pay for doing that through the air and I guarantee you that run game opens up.

And I think this is where the problem lies. The style & personnel type that Dallas plays only really works if you have a top 1 or 2 dominant OL in the league. This OL is probably somewhere around 10th in the league. Good, but not great. Your QB doesn’t have what it takes to carry you for a whole game. He’s a gamer and will come up big at crunch time but there’s still that other 75% of the game to worry about where you need production on the road vs a Rams caliber team.
The Oline is actually 15th. Middle of the pack in the whole league. What did you expect with only 2 original All Pro starters (Martin and Smith), yet playing injured themselves all season?
 

ClintDagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Reaction score
1,632
Much of this Offense's failure happened due to this Oline and Zeke's inability to get rushing yards. Hard to keep drives alive and score points when it's hard to convert those 3rd & 7s/8s when you're only picking up 2-3 yards total running the ball on both 1st & 2nd downs.
Rams sold out to stop the run. This OL and RB weren’t able to just impose their will and beat that approach. No question about that. That’s when you’ve got to be able to make them pay in other ways. They weren’t good enough or didn’t know how to do that either. And their D got whipped too. I’m not surprised the D got whipped, although I am surprised it happened on the ground. But I thought the offense was going to step up this game particularly through the air given that I knew Wade would find a way to slow down Zeke. But the O is beat up too with Jarwin and Beasley (and also Zeke I suspect). So I’m not blaming Dak, what I’m saying is I reject the narrative that this loss was on the D. I see it as at least a 50/50 split between the D & O. Neither side adjusted one iota to what LA set out to do.
 

ClintDagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,116
Reaction score
1,632
The Oline is actually 15th. Middle of the pack in the whole league. What did you expect with only 2 original All Pro starters (Martin and Smith), yet playing injured themselves all season?
I think they’re closer to 10. Two all pros, Looney was very, very good this year, and Collins is at least solid. The other spot was an issue sure but just about every OL is dealing with that after 16+ games.
 

America's Cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,809
Reaction score
47,205
I think they’re closer to 10. Two all pros, Looney was very, very good this year, and Collins is at least solid. The other spot was an issue sure but just about every OL is dealing with that after 16+ games.
Are you ready for the statistical fact of where our Cowboys Oline ranked by the end of this 2018 Regular Season?

Cowboys Oline finished ranked 31st out of 32 teams!

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categoryst...8&seasonType=REG&experience=&tabSeq=2&role=TM

That says everything as to why our Cowboys season went the way it went and why it ended the way it did in the playoffs. Look at our opponents Oline rankings.

POST EDIT: I just now created a new thread based solely on our Cowboys Oline end of 2018 season ranking.

For anyone wanting to discuss:

https://cowboyszone.com/threads/cow...18-season-ranked-31st-out-of-32-teams.427032/
 
Last edited:

Tenkamenin

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,591
Reaction score
4,023
Rams sold out to stop the run. This OL and RB weren’t able to just impose their will and beat that approach. No question about that. That’s when you’ve got to be able to make them pay in other ways. They weren’t good enough or didn’t know how to do that either. And their D got whipped too. I’m not surprised the D got whipped, although I am surprised it happened on the ground. But I thought the offense was going to step up this game particularly through the air given that I knew Wade would find a way to slow down Zeke. But the O is beat up too with Jarwin and Beasley (and also Zeke I suspect). So I’m not blaming Dak, what I’m saying is I reject the narrative that this loss was on the D. I see it as at least a 50/50 split between the D & O. Neither side adjusted one iota to what LA set out to do.

Our offense isn’t designed to make anyone pay because that requires scheming. You can’t blame Dak for that one......
 

aria

Well-Known Member
Messages
17,543
Reaction score
16,793
With what Dallas has and add in around 70mil in cap space you can bet Dallas will be one of the teams to beat next yr. Dallas hasnt had this kind of flexibility since basically before the salary cap
I’m not so sure of that, every other team in the NFCE will be significantly better. With all the injuries Washington and the Eagles had, the division was ours for the taking. We had a great opportunity this year to reach the playoffs and we blew it. We also had one of the easiest schedules in the league. I was more optimistic about this season then next year.
 

Swagger

Well-Known Member
Messages
6,002
Reaction score
7,737
I think the D was beat up. Lawrence, Collins, Crawford, Woods, LVE, Brown, were all well below 100% and LA was coming off a bye. The offense was beat up too. I think what we saw Saturday night was what happens when you dig a 3-5 hole and basically have to win out in order to take the division. Plus this team essentially had to take every game during that stretch right down to the wire when they should have put many of those games away much earlier.

Bottom line, there’s a reason most of the team the 1’s and 2’s make it to conference championship weekend. What happens in the reg season is just so critical. Dallas is stuck in a bad spot of not getting a top 2 seed, yet having to play a first place schedule where they will see NO and LA next year no matter what. So odds are they won’t get a 1 or 2 seed next year and probably won’t make the playoffs either if history is any indication.

Completely agree.

It's easy to criticise the defense but every team that played during the first week of the post season struggled at some point this weekend - the Colts and Cowboys looked drained, the Chargers were just embarrassing and the Eagles played well and took advantage of the Saints being off their game in the first half only to tire and look drained in the second half which was in line with the other teams that played the week before.

The guys playing are not robots.

I do also agree with the other post that the play calling on offense was again poor and I HATE playing zone defense. Our cornerbacks are good enough for us to play man.

I still have hope for next season. We will surely draft a safety or a tight end in the second round.

We will need an elite offense to win with Prescott though and that's the concern going forwards. Prescott played as well as he can in his own style but I just don't like it! It has nothing to do with #9 more that I remain unconvinced that it can win us a Superbowl which is all I care about.

Against the Rams we were 1/10 on third down, the quarterback down.
Elliott rushed for 47 yards from 20 carries so the Rams went all out to stop our running game - there must have been countless opportunities to punish them through the air...yet we only put up 14 points until what was effectively a garbage time TD late on in which the Rams were pretty happy to give up as it chewed up the clock.
Prescott threw a lovely ball to Gallup for the TD (also a tremendous catch) but a lot of the throws he completed were to receivers who were completely wide open. He missed some important, fairly regulation throws and was fortunate to avoid a pick six on a poor throw. Further, I still question his ability to throw the ball to receivers who are not already open. But he does have his strengths, his wheels, durability and he is pretty solid with his easy throws. At times he gets away with turning the ball over but he is generally good in that regard as well.

Whereas whilst Goff didn't have amazing numbers (he didn't need to as the running game worked wonders for them) he threw several excellent balls into tight windows and moved the chains with clutch third down throws and even had the token rushing play on third down to ice the game.

I will be accused of being a Dak hater etc but just stating what I saw and I do appreciate it's a case of who else is out there...if it was me I would go for Joe Flacco. He gets a lot of criticism but I genuinely think he would give us a better chance of winning a Superbowl, especially as he is fantastic in the post season and would punish teams that load the box through the air.

It was a good season but disappointing to a certain extent as I think we have a pretty loaded roster. Hopefully the O-Line can get healthy for the start of next season.
 
Last edited:

morasp

Well-Known Member
Messages
8,433
Reaction score
6,841
My thoughts are that the most glaring statistic I saw this weekend was the three teams that haven't made it to the conference championship in 20+ years. The cowboys and two others. So basically as a franchise we're the bottom of the barrel. No wonder Cowboys fans are frustrated.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,437
Reaction score
19,199
I dont always disagree with them on Dak when he's bad, but yesterday was not one of them days. Dak was the only reason they were in it.

Yep, shore up the OL and get a new OC. Most people could easily see which offense took planning and which one looked like it was drawn in the dirt.
 

Irvin88_4life

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,492
Reaction score
26,367
Without dak yes Dallas gets blown out the rams game. Its opposite almost every other game this season minus maybe 4 though.
Really cause we only had 6 games we lost. Only 2 games were by double digits. One being the throw away game in Indy and the other in Seattle by 11. Every other one was within 1 score
 
Top