glimmerman
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 30,041
- Reaction score
- 29,902
So that’s 8 million a year. 14 if he goes the whole 4 years. Which he won’t.
If we paid him 18 per year, would you gripe about that too?
Lawrence, because he only showed up for 8 games. And if he wants BIG money for that...then give me that old, washed up, terrible has-been safety who had 2 INTs against us last season, who has chemistry with Richard and can lead a secondary.
That's really funny. Lawrence who on several pre free agency lists was ranked NUMBER 1 top free agent and you would let him go for an INJURY prone 30 year old safety that very well would be doing his you rah rah from the sidelines watch another safety play because he's hurt again. BTW Lawrence started 15 games and played in all 16 plus the playoffs with a bad shoulder.
Do you do a standup routine in comedy clubs too.
.
Yeah too much for a guy who’s been hurt so much as of lateSo that’s 8 million a year. 14 if he goes the whole 4 years. Which he won’t.
Then you should really love this upcoming season, when this team craters again and everyone gets fired.
And some fans will still have the nerve to ask "why"?
Please don’t use smart move and our FO in the same sentence.I would have liked ET but that was an expensive contract. I would have passed on that as well. While we need to upgrade, we don't need to upgrade "at all cost". This was a smart move by the FO.
I admit I wasn't as sold on ET as a lot of people were but I also admit this is pretty embarrassing
Dallas could have lived with that contract and he would have been a big help to our young defense and helped in more ways than just his play. Cowboys have become cheap and honestly its pretty pathetic.