KB1122
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 3,401
- Reaction score
- 1,689
as a backup?
Or someone like him?
For me, this would be a major vote of confidence. For years, I thought the Cowboys wasted money paying for veteran backup quarterbacks like Kyle Orton or John Kitna. I think in normal seasons, you should just go with a guy like Cooper Rush. If your qb gets injured, you just hand the ball off 42 times for three games and hope you go 2-1. If the starter is out longer than that, you're probably screwed, and you'd rather have the higher draft pick.
The only exception, IMO, would be in seasons where you think you could legitimately win the Super Bowl. Then it might be worth paying the extra amount for a guy with an OK record as a starter. I'm starting to feel that way.
I look around and Bradford, if he has stayed in football shape, seems like a fit. Or maybe there's a player we could trade for.
Ideas?
Or someone like him?
For me, this would be a major vote of confidence. For years, I thought the Cowboys wasted money paying for veteran backup quarterbacks like Kyle Orton or John Kitna. I think in normal seasons, you should just go with a guy like Cooper Rush. If your qb gets injured, you just hand the ball off 42 times for three games and hope you go 2-1. If the starter is out longer than that, you're probably screwed, and you'd rather have the higher draft pick.
The only exception, IMO, would be in seasons where you think you could legitimately win the Super Bowl. Then it might be worth paying the extra amount for a guy with an OK record as a starter. I'm starting to feel that way.
I look around and Bradford, if he has stayed in football shape, seems like a fit. Or maybe there's a player we could trade for.
Ideas?