Would Romo have us at 5-0?

[Romo_To_Dez]

You still haven't figured out getting stats in garbage time compared to getting stats when the other team is still blitzing and playing aggressive.

Tell you what, go do some research and once you finally figure it out come back and talk.

They call it garbage time, that's why it must have been so easy for Romo to make the scores closer in the 44-6 game loss against Philly or the 34-3 loss against the Vikings. I'll guess they will say that the Vikings and Eagles were playing aggressive defense during those games and never played prevent and that is why Romo couldn't make the score closer in those games. If Romo had even come back to make those scores closer, then it would have been used as another aspects in the "Building of the legend of Romo and blame all of the other Cowboys players on the team for any losses and failures that Romo's teams had." agenda filled narrative that's going on.

 

[Aviano90]

They call it garbage time, that's why it must have been so easy for Romo to make the scores closer in the 44-6 game loss against Philly or the 34-3 loss against the Vikings. I'll guess they will say that the Vikings and Eagles were playing aggressive defense during those games and never played prevent and that is why Romo couldn't make the score closer in those games. If Romo had even come back to make those scores closer, then it would have been used as another aspects in the "Building of the legend of Romo and blame all of the other Cowboys players on the team for any losses and failures that Romo's teams had." agenda filled narrative that's going on.

That means this is a garbage time game falling behind 23-0.

https://www.espn.com/nfl/game/_/gameId/321028006

 

[LetsBeReal]

You still haven't figured out getting stats in garbage time compared to getting stats when the other team is still blitzing and playing aggressive.

Tell you what, go do some research and once you finally figure it out come back and talk.

31-3 is the research.

What did he do when it was 0-0?

I’ll give you a hint, he got beat 31-3

 

[LetsBeReal]

and our agenda would include taking either Mahomes or Wilson over Dak any day. Still gonna peddle that agenda BS, nephew ?,

You still haven't figured out getting stats in garbage time compared to getting stats when the other team is still blitzing and playing aggressive.

Tell you what, go do some research and once you finally figure it out come back and talk.

I watched kellen Moore go 30-38 for 350ish, something like that, as a cowboy one time. Big deal. Do it in games that matter. Do it in games you win. Don’t brag to me about stats when your team was down 31-3 at their house. Dak is a backup qb on more than half the teams in the league. He will not get a contract unless he wins super bowl and as of right now this team will be lucky to get to the playoffs. This team will be run through zeke if they ever beat a good team. They are gonna run it through dak this year and he’s gonna fall on his face and draft a qb, and then sign a defensive tackle that can keep our lb’s that juke blockers instead of shed them, clean.

 

[Flamma]

I think people forget how hard it is to start 5-0 regardless of the quarterback. The Cowboys have done it 6 times. Twice in the late 60s. A Staubach led Cowboys team did it twice in the mid 70s. Danny White in '83. And we all know 2007.

 

[G2]

31-3 is the research.

What did he do when it was 0-0?

I’ll give you a hint, he got beat 31-3

Nothing to do with the defense allowing scores.

 

[Irvin88_4life]

31-3 is the research.

What did he do when it was 0-0?

I’ll give you a hint, he got beat 31-3

Wrong again. Score was 34-24.

Seems you really dislike Dak on a personal level just by the way you talk. It's clear you are a doofus and going on ignore. So good day to you

 

[keysersoze]

and our agenda would include taking either Mahomes or Wilson over Dak any day. Still gonna peddle that agenda BS, nephew ?,

Absolutely. You guys only say that because those men aren’t on the team. If they were you’d be looking for ways to berate them as well. Anyone who actually says Romo was elite definitely has an agenda. Romo has NEVER put together 3 consecutive winning seasons. With any team we’ve had during his career. So to disrespect Dak in Romo’s favor definitely shows some kind of agenda.

 

[Romo_To_Dez]

Absolutely. You guys only say that because those men aren’t on the team. If they were you’d be looking for ways to berate them as well. Anyone who actually says Romo was elite definitely has an agenda. Romo has NEVER put together 3 consecutive winning seasons. With any team we’ve had during his career. So to disrespect Dak in Romo’s favor definitely shows some kind of agenda.

Yet, they blame Garrett and the other Cowboys players for this and not Romo. The Cowboys have had schedules that I'm sure was easier than the one that the team has now and yet some are guaranteeing that Romo would go 6-0, 7-0 and that the Cowboys would be unstoppable with Romo.

Romo was a part of the teams that had a big lead against the likes of the Lions and a Matt Flynn lead Packers team, just to end up losing the game because he threw pick sixes against the Lions or because Garrett decided to throw the ball with a 26-3 lead against the Packers, and put in it Romo's hands instead of Murray's and the Cowboys choked that game away, with a couple of Romo INTs to seal that game.

For all of the talk about Dak needing Zeke. Romo needed Murray to prevent from losing the game to the Packers. Again with revisionists history of bashing Dak for the loss to back up Bridgewater, when the Cowboys lost to back up Matt Flynn with Romo as the QB.

The rebuilding of Romo's legendary status and pretending like he never had the types of bad games or made the bad throws that they now bash Dak for.

 

[keysersoze]

Yet, they blame Garrett and the other Cowboys players for this and not Romo. The Cowboys have had schedules that I'm sure was easier than the one that the team has now and yet some are guaranteeing that Romo would go 6-0, 7-0 and that the Cowboys would be unstoppable with Romo.

Romo was a part of the teams that had a big lead against the likes of the Lions and a Matt Flynn lead Packers team, just to end up losing the game because he threw pick sixes against the Lions or because Garrett decided to throw the ball with a 26-3 lead against the Packers, and put in it Romo's hands instead of Murray's and the Cowboys choked that game away, with a couple of Romo INTs to seal that game.

For all of the talk about Dak needing Zeke. Romo needed Murray to prevent from losing the game to the Packers. Again with revisionists history of bashing Dak for the loss to back up Bridgewater, when the Cowboys lost to back up Matt Flynn with Romo as the QB.

The rebuilding of Romo's legendary status and pretending like he never had the types of bad games or made the bad throws that they now bash Dak for.

You are absolutely correct. But yeah. There’s no agenda. SMDH.... This bs is crazy

 

[Corso]

You are absolutely correct. But yeah. There’s no agenda. SMDH.... This bs is crazy

The Scientific Method does not apply in sports.
It's all Eye Tests and gut feelings and emotions like hormonal girls.

I kind of dig it. This is my kind of game!

 

[Ultra Warrior]

At least 4-1. He would have won that Saints game. The Packer game is the only one that would be questionable in my mind.

 

[the_h0wey]

So open for debate. Would Romo in his prime have us at 5-0 with this current team?

Which loss do you blame Dak for?

 

[Captain-Crash]

SMDH

 

[BoysForLife]

Yea. I’m talking about the 49ers team who didn’t do crap in 2014. Who gives a damn about what they did the year before? They struggled mightily in 2014. And that the season I’m speaking of. And Romo had more than just an off game. He was terrible. And you just proved my point. The mistakes of others on the team are attributed to Dak while they are excuses for Romo. You guys are truly hypocritical

We went 12-4 in 2014.

Who gives a crap about one bad game in week 1? LOL

Your spinning bad bro. It's enjoyable to watch

 

[keysersoze]

We went 12-4 in 2014.

Who gives a crap about one bad game in week 1? LOL

Your spinning bad bro. It's enjoyable to watch

We were talking about losing to weaker teams. And furthermore in 2014 we were playing a 3rd place schedule. So I’m not sure how many WINNING TEAMS we actually beat that season. But hey! Whatever.

 

[Elusiv1]

I'm sorry but Romo

We were talking about losing to weaker teams. And furthermore in 2014 we were playing a 3rd place schedule. So I’m not sure how many WINNING TEAMS we actually beat that season. But hey! Whatever.

The biggest win was beating the brakes out of Seattle on the road..That was our signature win that year if i recall..The other one would have been and should have been the Packers on the road but we all know the ****ery that occured that game!! Smdh

 

[keysersoze]

I'm sorry but Romo

The biggest win was beating the brakes out of Seattle on the road..That was our signature win that year if i recall..The other one would have been and should have been the Packers on the road but we all know the ****ery that occured that game!! Smdh

Agreed.

 

[Elusiv1]

Our signature win this year will be the Patriots. I have a hunch that this game will be like last years Saints game.

 

[keysersoze]

Our signature win this year will be the Patriots. I have a hunch that this game will be like last years Saints game.

I sure hope so!!!