If you could sign Prescott for that cost today, would you do it or not?
If you could sign Prescott for that cost today, would you do it or not?
And that was my defense for signing him, that 67% win %.our 6-7 record speaks for me. no.
LMAO, he should have added PAPPY, no need to respond.LOL...are you serious?
LMAO, he should have added PAPPY, no need to respond.
Would you stop it.I wonder if it is smarter to not give out any big contracts and rebuild as opposed to paying this group and trying to win with them. Dak is a good QB so it would be hard to part with him but I also don't see the current collection of players being just a coach away. There is a toxic environment here that might need to be gutted rather than just shined up a bit. I don't think Dak is part of the problem but it's hard to rebuild when your QB is making $35-40 million.
LOL...are you serious?
The question is "serious". I know that nobody takes you seriously, but that wasn't the question that was posed.
Tag is cheaper and you get another year to evaluate under the new HC. Can always sign him the following year.
I am maybe partially in/out.If you could sign Prescott for that cost today, would you do it or not?
Sticks and stones ......in the end Dak will be very lucky to even get a 1 year Tag.
LMAO, he should have added PAPPY, no need to respond.
And your act is old, tired, and stale.
Already everything you've tried to claim has been shredded. You've been shown to have been completely, utterly, and totally wrong and you're a forum joke at this point. If that was the goal? Rest easy, well done, mission accomplished.