It also doesn't factor in the actual point of saying Dalton is his twin. The point is if you put Dalton here you won't see any big drop off in performance. I don't get how the super pro Dak people still don't get it yet. You're right they are using all types of mental gymnastics to try to say their man isn't on the same level as Smith and DaltonYeah... Unfortunately stats don't factor in opponents.. Dak was great against garbage teams.
We saw how he did in big games.. We've seen the post season success he has had under his Rookie contract. (virtually none)
If Dak was one of the best NFL QB's we easily make the playoffs.
If charts like this are your proof that Dak is awesome then why not try to get Derek Carr.
If I can get Carr for 25 or Dak for 35-40 then give me Carr.
Dak has the same playoff success as Romo in a quarter of the time in the playoffsYeah... Unfortunately stats don't factor in opponents.. Dak was great against garbage teams.
We saw how he did in big games.. We've seen the post season success he has had under his Rookie contract. (virtually none)
If Dak was one of the best NFL QB's we easily make the playoffs.
If charts like this are your proof that Dak is awesome then why not try to get Derek Carr.
If I can get Carr for 25 or Dak for 35-40 then give me Carr.
Dak has the same playoff success as Romo in a quarter of the time in the playoffs
Dak’s first 3 years:Yeah... Unfortunately stats don't factor in opponents.. Dak was great against garbage teams.
We saw how he did in big games.. We've seen the post season success he has had under his Rookie contract. (virtually none)
If Dak was one of the best NFL QB's we easily make the playoffs.
If charts like this are your proof that Dak is awesome then why not try to get Derek Carr.
If I can get Carr for 25 or Dak for 35-40 then give me Carr.
Dak’s first 3 years:
“Who cares about wins and losses!?!? That’s a team stat!! Dak’s individual numbers aren’t gaudy!!”
Dak in 2019:
“Who cares about gaudy stats!?!? Look at Dak’s mediocre W/L record!!!”
Cute attempt at discrediting the guy. He’s 40-24 as a starter because he’s a good QB.I think the point is Dak's play isn't much of a factor in our "success" or lack there of.
He's just a guy out there doing his job in an optimal environment.
He was fortunate to inherit the Cowboys roster and not the Bengals.
He doesn't suck..
He's slightly above average and not worth big money. We need a lot of things to ever win with him as our QB and it's basically proven you can't give a QB big money and provide all the things they need to win a championship also.
Quality QB play for cheap is needed. We will get slightly above average QB play for a lot.
This idea that he is a "stat padder" and he's really just an avg qb has zero basis in fact.
Why can’t people put their Dak posts in with one of the other 30 Dak posts?
Did you actually look at the chart?Dalton is a good regular season QB, but disappears in the playoffs. So this has zero meaning
It's not a tough argument to make though that we haven't won with Dak adding almost nothing to cap, and so having him take up 10%+ of the cap going forward sure isn't going to make it easier.Dak’s first 3 years:
“Who cares about wins and losses!?!? That’s a team stat!! Dak’s individual numbers aren’t gaudy!!”
Dak in 2019:
“Who cares about gaudy stats!?!? Look at Dak’s mediocre W/L record!!!”
Dak is the best Cowboys QB since Aikman. Don't @ meYeah and Romo's contract basically ended his chances of a championship and Romo is a much better player.
Dak for cheap is awesome.
Dak getting paid like he is elite is not awesome and all but guarantees no Superbowl.
And if they win will you shut up about it?Yeah and Romo's contract basically ended his chances of a championship and Romo is a much better player.
Dak for cheap is awesome.
Dak getting paid like he is elite is not awesome and all but guarantees no Superbowl.
And if they win will you shut up about it?
You speak as if you know any of the "GMs" in the NFL..He doesn't suck.
He's about like Dak.
I don't think there is 1 NFL GM that would take Dak over Wentz either. That is some fan generated crap that only a Cowboy fan would say.
I think there is quite a few GM who would take Carr over Dak.. At least a handful... Especially if you factor in Cap Space.
IMO Dak > Carr - Dak 35 mill < Carr 25 mill
Facts. After Dak I’ll say Romo.Dak is the best Cowboys QB since Aikman. Don't @ me
Yeah... Unfortunately stats don't factor in opponents.. Dak was great against garbage teams.
We saw how he did in big games.. We've seen the post season success he has had under his Rookie contract. (virtually none)
If Dak was one of the best NFL QB's we easily make the playoffs.
If charts like this are your proof that Dak is awesome then why not try to get Derek Carr.
If I can get Carr for 25 or Dak for 35-40 then give me Carr.