Boy, did you just make up a load of crap about what the article said. Lol. Of course, you do that frequently.
The article actually says Jarwin should “blossom” now, just in less of a traditional TE role. It says Jarwin will be used often more like a big slot receiver, and his ability as a receiver is fairly well established, and his numbers were hindered by Witten playing so much. The only thing you got even close to right is that Ryle feels Pollard may occasionally be used without Jarwin, and there will be fewer 2 TE sets, but the indication in the article was clearly that Jarwin will play most of the time - and do well.
By the way, Beasley never indicated a TE shouldn’t play, and in fact, in the 11 personnel you said Beasley touted, a TE did play. 3 WRs does not eliminate the TE.
Meaning this coach wont have a safety valve checkdown te system. He wants 3 wr sets on every play minimal. He basically wants a te that can go deep. If Jarwin doesnt have any game winning in him pollard or austin have more scoring output a way fewer snaps and targets btw. We need a 4th wr who can make
Also, by the way, Austin STILL isn’t on the Dallas Cowboys, so you are STILL pushing something that isn’t even possible with him.