Revisiting Rashaun Slater Tackle Northwestern

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,939
Reaction score
19,126
We all know last season our offensive line was decimated with injuries across the board. Now only did our two starting tackles miss the the majority of the season, their backups missed multiple games. Even our ironman, all-pro Guard missed significant time. Outside of Connor Williams, all other 4 starters missed time throughout the season.

Many will argue that the offensive line is aging and their best days are behind them. Once considered one of the best, if not the best offensive lines in the entire league. Team already lost their all-pro Center in Frederick to retirement, Tyron/Martin have back issues, Collins just had hip surgery where there were whispers he may no longer have cartilage left. All the veterans are expected back, but as they grow older, can they still be relied upon to play a full schedule and stay productive? Issues within the OL, can potentially derail an entire season.

At first, I thought the need is more of a developmental, future starting Tackle, but with so many questions, they must act now or we may see the likes of Knight/Steele manning the position. It makes no sense to sign Dak Prescott to a huge extension and not being able to protect their investment.

Why Rashaun Slater?

-Many believe he could become a day 1 impact starter at all 5 OL positions. In my opinion, a very similar prospect to Zach Martin. Extremely good technician. Some will project him inside, due to lack of length, like they did with Martin. He would instantly upgrade the left guard position yr 1, if everyone comes back healthy.

-He dominated Chase Young on the college level, a player we have to face twice a year. Washington Football Team dominated the trenches in both our match-ups this season. Why not add his kryptonite. It's not just Washington who has the good front, all teams in the division have them.

-There is no need for a swing tackle, for a team like the Cowboys who are up against the cap, that extra savings could be huge, perhaps even used to add another fa defender. Team would have quality interior backups in the two Connors, where Slater can easily slide to Tackle in event of injury.

-The biggest question of all of this is, how many years does Tyron truly have left? Having Slater gives them options, if they decided to release Smith, it could create upwards of 10 million in cap space. They could even trade him for another quality draft pick, before it's too late.

I am fully aware of all the defensive needs this team truly has, but let's be honest, if this offense cannot carry this team, they have little chance for success even with an improved defense. Drafting Slater makes too much sense, if available.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,270
Reaction score
9,358
I am on board with Slater at 10, but the versatility argument doesn't work with me. If we're picking him at 10, he better be a LT or RT, and that's it.

I think I’m on the same page.

If we’re taking this kid at 10 he better be able to be a long term OT option.

I hope they’re doing their homework on Darrisaw...I think he’s right up there near Slater.
 

JBS

Well-Known Member
Messages
21,594
Reaction score
22,262
We all know last season our offensive line was decimated with injuries across the board. Now only did our two starting tackles miss the the majority of the season, their backups missed multiple games. Even our ironman, all-pro Guard missed significant time. Outside of Connor Williams, all other 4 starters missed time throughout the season.

Many will argue that the offensive line is aging and their best days are behind them. Once considered one of the best, if not the best offensive lines in the entire league. Team already lost their all-pro Center in Frederick to retirement, Tyron/Martin have back issues, Collins just had hip surgery where there were whispers he may no longer have cartilage left. All the veterans are expected back, but as they grow older, can they still be relied upon to play a full schedule and stay productive? Issues within the OL, can potentially derail an entire season.

At first, I thought the need is more of a developmental, future starting Tackle, but with so many questions, they must act now or we may see the likes of Knight/Steele manning the position. It makes no sense to sign Dak Prescott to a huge extension and not being able to protect their investment.

Why Rashaun Slater?

-Many believe he could become a day 1 impact starter at all 5 OL positions. In my opinion, a very similar prospect to Zach Martin. Extremely good technician. Some will project him inside, due to lack of length, like they did with Martin. He would instantly upgrade the left guard position yr 1, if everyone comes back healthy.

-He dominated Chase Young on the college level, a player we have to face twice a year. Washington Football Team dominated the trenches in both our match-ups this season. Why not add his kryptonite. It's not just Washington who has the good front, all teams in the division have them.

-There is no need for a swing tackle, for a team like the Cowboys who are up against the cap, that extra savings could be huge, perhaps even used to add another fa defender. Team would have quality interior backups in the two Connors, where Slater can easily slide to Tackle in event of injury.

-The biggest question of all of this is, how many years does Tyron truly have left? Having Slater gives them options, if they decided to release Smith, it could create upwards of 10 million in cap space. They could even trade him for another quality draft pick, before it's too late.

I am fully aware of all the defensive needs this team truly has, but let's be honest, if this offense cannot carry this team, they have little chance for success even with an improved defense. Drafting Slater makes too much sense, if available.

The offense has never really proven capable of carrying this team. Of course the offense is better than the defense, but the offense hasnt carried this team anywhere. The offensive line needs some youth, that isn't arguable. However, we can't expect to just field a better defense (better than the worst in the nfl) and expect that to get the job done. I see too many people on here thinking this way and I don't think it's accurate. Then again, when you have the worst defense, the only realistic expectation at that point is to try and get an average defense and hope for the best. So I can understand the logic.

With that said, this defense is going to have to be as good as the offense before this franchise ever does anything of note. We need 5 or 6 new pieces on defense, and we need Quinn to implement a scheme that these players can succeed in. If and when that happens, we can probably contend in the nfc. Barring a significant gap in talent, which I would be OK with, the #10 pick should go on the defensive side of the ball.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,624
Reaction score
23,110
Slater is a good player, but he's a tackle in a guards body. Give me Leatherwood any day over Slater. And, honestly, I like Leatherwood over Sewell, too. He's a complete blocker who has elite strength and movement skills. He can maul or play finesse, zone schemes. He can play both sides of the line. He out flanks speed rushers with length and athleticism while mauling inside moves with strength, tenacity, and anger.
 

Malhavoc

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,407
Reaction score
2,273
This team has no choice but to go defense early and often in this draft. Does it mean you reach for defensive players ? No. But I do think the 1st 2 rounds will preovide talent on defense for us to consider.
 

Beaker42

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,141
Reaction score
7,429
I think I’m on the same page.

If we’re taking this kid at 10 he better be able to be a long term OT option.

I hope they’re doing their homework on Darrisaw...I think he’s right up there near Slater.
Darrisaw’s feet are better than Skater’s. Slater could get called for a hold on nearly ever pass play. Don’t like him AT ALL.
 

Beaker42

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,141
Reaction score
7,429
Slater is a good player, but he's a tackle in a guards body. Give me Leatherwood any day over Slater. And, honestly, I like Leatherwood over Sewell, too. He's a complete blocker who has elite strength and movement skills. He can maul or play finesse, zone schemes. He can play both sides of the line. He out flanks speed rushers with length and athleticism while mauling inside moves with strength, tenacity, and anger.
Watch tape on Sewell, Darrisaw, Leatherwood and Slater. They should go in that order. If we take any of them over Sewell (which won’t be an option), I will turn my fan card it to the Commissioner’s podium.
 

bodi

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,676
Reaction score
3,134
give me

CHRISTIAN DARRISAW OL
Dillon Radunz
ALEX LEATHERWOOD
ALARIC JACKSON
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,156
Reaction score
16,906
We all know last season our offensive line was decimated with injuries across the board. Now only did our two starting tackles miss the the majority of the season, their backups missed multiple games. Even our ironman, all-pro Guard missed significant time. Outside of Connor Williams, all other 4 starters missed time throughout the season.

Many will argue that the offensive line is aging and their best days are behind them. Once considered one of the best, if not the best offensive lines in the entire league. Team already lost their all-pro Center in Frederick to retirement, Tyron/Martin have back issues, Collins just had hip surgery where there were whispers he may no longer have cartilage left. All the veterans are expected back, but as they grow older, can they still be relied upon to play a full schedule and stay productive? Issues within the OL, can potentially derail an entire season.

At first, I thought the need is more of a developmental, future starting Tackle, but with so many questions, they must act now or we may see the likes of Knight/Steele manning the position. It makes no sense to sign Dak Prescott to a huge extension and not being able to protect their investment.

Why Rashaun Slater?

-Many believe he could become a day 1 impact starter at all 5 OL positions. In my opinion, a very similar prospect to Zach Martin. Extremely good technician. Some will project him inside, due to lack of length, like they did with Martin. He would instantly upgrade the left guard position yr 1, if everyone comes back healthy.

-He dominated Chase Young on the college level, a player we have to face twice a year. Washington Football Team dominated the trenches in both our match-ups this season. Why not add his kryptonite. It's not just Washington who has the good front, all teams in the division have them.

-There is no need for a swing tackle, for a team like the Cowboys who are up against the cap, that extra savings could be huge, perhaps even used to add another fa defender. Team would have quality interior backups in the two Connors, where Slater can easily slide to Tackle in event of injury.

-The biggest question of all of this is, how many years does Tyron truly have left? Having Slater gives them options, if they decided to release Smith, it could create upwards of 10 million in cap space. They could even trade him for another quality draft pick, before it's too late.

I am fully aware of all the defensive needs this team truly has, but let's be honest, if this offense cannot carry this team, they have little chance for success even with an improved defense. Drafting Slater makes too much sense, if available.
Slater is only 6’3 and has short arms. At his best he could be Zach Martin but remember if the Cowboys had the 10th pick in the Martin draft they would not have drafted him. At 16 they were going to draft Ryan Shazier but the Steelers got him one pick before. I like Slater but if he is a stud tackle, he will not get past the top 6.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,624
Reaction score
23,110
Watch tape on Sewell, Darrisaw, Leatherwood and Slater. They should go in that order. If we take any of them over Sewell (which won’t be an option), I will turn my fan card it to the Commissioner’s podium.

Sewell is a good player, but I don't like questions about his motor and passion. Leatherwood played every game and dominated the best conference in college. He also plays in more of a pro scheme. Leatherwood will be the best OL from this class when all is said and done.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,156
Reaction score
16,906
Sewell is a good player, but I don't like questions about his motor and passion. Leatherwood played every game and dominated the best conference in college. He also plays in more of a pro scheme. Leatherwood will be the best OL from this class when all is said and done.
I don’t think Leatherwood, Darrisaw, and Slater are good enough to make me pass on Parsons, Collins, Surtain, and Farley. We just have to many issues to pass on a blue chip defensive player.
 

texbumthelife

Well-Known Member
Messages
22,624
Reaction score
23,110
I don’t think Leatherwood, Darrisaw, and Slater are good enough to make me pass on Parsons, Collins, Surtain, and Farley. We just have to many issues to pass on a blue chip defensive player.

I think Leatherwood is better at his position than any of those guys are at theirs, but I get what you're saying.
 

baltcowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,156
Reaction score
16,906
I think Leatherwood is better at his position than any of those guys are at theirs, but I get what you're saying.
I would take Leatherwood 2nd to Sewell at tackle but man we need defense. Even if Tyron is done we can’t afford to draft another offensive player in the first round. I get the take the best player available argument but we don’t need anymore receivers or offensive linemen in the first round. The offense is not the problem.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,939
Reaction score
19,126
Slater is only 6’3 and has short arms. At his best he could be Zach Martin but remember if the Cowboys had the 10th pick in the Martin draft they would not have drafted him. At 16 they were going to draft Ryan Shazier but the Steelers got him one pick before. I like Slater but if he is a stud tackle, he will not get past the top 6.

I think he does end up being drafted ahead of us for a team like Cincy if Sewell is already off the board.
 

conner01

Well-Known Member
Messages
28,075
Reaction score
25,986
I am on board with Slater at 10, but the versatility argument doesn't work with me. If we're picking him at 10, he better be a LT or RT, and that's it.
I doubt he’d be either the first season
You gonna cut smith? Collins?
 

exciter

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,676
Reaction score
3,501
Slater is only 6’3 and has short arms. At his best he could be Zach Martin but remember if the Cowboys had the 10th pick in the Martin draft they would not have drafted him. At 16 they were going to draft Ryan Shazier but the Steelers got him one pick before. I like Slater but if he is a stud tackle, he will not get past the top 6.
Yup, he’s a right guard or right tackle at the next level and stretch at right tackle!
 

Teague31

Defender of the Star
Messages
17,673
Reaction score
21,892
Zero chance. It would be less than zero if that’s possible
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,939
Reaction score
19,126
So with La'El Collins coming back and Tyron Smith.....you are basically suggesting we take a swing tackle for next season?
Not saying that at all. Gives team options, can release or trade Tyron, could play Guard yr 1 and take over for Tyron full time in another yr.
 
Top