Revisiting Micah Parsons

cowboyec

Well-Known Member
Messages
33,579
Reaction score
40,418
if he can address concerns about his immaturity and if football is THAT important to him....i'd have 0 problem with him at 10.
the talent is there.
where is his want to?
i also wouldn't hate jok,notre dame either.
but if both those cb's are gone and they feel good about Tyron and La'el....parsons HAS to be in consideration.
helluva talent.
 

Cowboyny

Well-Known Member
Messages
15,935
Reaction score
19,122
I still haven’t budged that Parsons is my fallback if one of the top two corners isn’t there.

Obviously, his background/character concerns have to check-out.

There isn’t a DT available that I’m willing to take at #10. Neither would I be enamored with taking Rashawn Slater there also.

Parsons’s ceiling is high. He’s still developing at the position and is already one of the best at the college level. We need talent at this position.

What....say....you?

Parsons scares me to death, immature, has issues with misdirection and still is learning how to play coverage. That reminds me too much of Jaylon Smith. If I am going to invest a top 10 pick for a non-rush linebacker, the player better be an elite 3 down player now, down the line. I think there will be a few quality linebackers in day two, early day 3, that could make an impact right away.
 

Carson

Well-Known Member
Messages
36,968
Reaction score
64,996
Parsons scares me to death, immature, has issues with misdirection and still is learning how to play coverage. That reminds me too much of Jaylon Smith. If I am going to invest a top 10 pick for a non-rush linebacker, the player better be an elite 3 down player now, down the line. I think there will be a few quality linebackers in day two, early day 3, that could make an impact right away.
Agreed. Much rather have Jabril Cox or Browning
 

Hawkeye0202

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,425
Reaction score
43,122
I wouldn’t say not to address. I just feel out of 1T, OLB, CB or FS that we could get by with a cheaper guy / later draft pick. We continue to follow that method at 1T and FS it hasn’t worked well. We’ve tried at corner and had some median of success.

This^^^
 

Malhavoc

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,406
Reaction score
2,273
Cox and Browning are nowhere near the the level of Parsons. The character concerns are legitimately something to consider. But as a prospect he is still the best defensive player in this draft IMO.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,260
Reaction score
9,349
Cox and Browning are nowhere near the the level of Parsons. The character concerns are legitimately something to consider. But as a prospect he is still the best defensive player in this draft IMO.

Not even close.

Cox is a stud in coverage but lacks instincts and eyes against the run. Browning is a better athlete than football player.
 

Daygoboy6191

Well-Known Member
Messages
997
Reaction score
602
Cox and Browning are nowhere near the the level of Parsons. The character concerns are legitimately something to consider. But as a prospect he is still the best defensive player in this draft IMO.

Considering where you need to draft Parsons vs where you need to draft Cox, Browning and Werner, plus you factor in the off the field issues the value is about equal.
Parsons has the highest upside, but also has bust potential based on where he is drafted. I feel like Cox, Browning, and Werner although they may never be perennial pro-bowl players they could all be good LB's that you could get day 2 allowing your 1st round pick to go to a high value position like QB, OT, or CB in this draft.
Until Dak is signed or traded QB needs to be at the top of our mind as of right now in the first round.
 

Jfconrow

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,302
Reaction score
685
I would love it. I have Pitts 1st, then Parsons....those are 1 and 2 on my board
 

Malhavoc

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,406
Reaction score
2,273
Considering where you need to draft Parsons vs where you need to draft Cox, Browning and Werner, plus you factor in the off the field issues the value is about equal.
Parsons has the highest upside, but also has bust potential based on where he is drafted. I feel like Cox, Browning, and Werner although they may never be perennial pro-bowl players they could all be good LB's that you could get day 2 allowing your 1st round pick to go to a high value position like QB, OT, or CB in this draft.
Until Dak is signed or traded QB needs to be at the top of our mind as of right now in the first round.
If the reason you are not drafting Parsons is because of the character concerns that’s legit. But Cox Browning and Cox are inferior players... by a LOT. The players you draft in the top 10 are players that have All Pro talent and upside. Parsons is that kind of player. Only reason to not consider him is the off the field stuff.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,260
Reaction score
9,349
If the reason you are not drafting Parsons is because of the character concerns that’s legit. But Cox Browning and Cox are inferior players... by a LOT. The players you draft in the top 10 are players that have All Pro talent and upside. Parsons is that kind of player. Only reason to not consider him is the off the field stuff.

100%
 

HungryLion

Well-Known Member
Messages
26,736
Reaction score
60,810
This defense needs talent.

it needs talent everywhere


This defense needs playmakers.

Parsons makes plays.

this defense needs to stop the run.

Parsons is a beast against the run.


If he is the best player available with your pick. You take him and you don’t stress over it.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
60,127
Reaction score
91,969
Here’s my concern. Two of his “cons” if you read some of his draft guides are two things that frustrate the hell out of people with Smith (and at times LVE).

Questions about his instincts and he’s not great at taking on blockers and shedding them.

But the flip side is there aren’t a ton of options at 10 if the CBs are gone. So he still might be the best player available.
 

CalPolyTechnique

Well-Known Member
Messages
27,344
Reaction score
44,106
Here’s my concern. Two of his “cons” if you read some of his draft guides are two things that frustrate the hell out of people with Smith (and at times LVE).

Questions about his instincts and he’s not great at taking on blockers and shedding them.

But the flip side is there aren’t a ton of options at 10 if the CBs are gone. So he still might be the best player available.

Here’s a scouting report on Bobby Wagner when he came (in terms of supposed negatives):

Negatives:

  • Small school competition
  • Boring tape- would struggle to fill a highlight reel
  • Could be more aggressive / he lets the play come to him too much
  • Finesse player, not very physical
  • Very slightly undersized / struggles to get off blocks

The point is I wouldn't really trip off reading scouting reports or comparing them.
 
Last edited:
Top