I'm sure all GM's and scouting directors have their noses pressed up against the TV screen while listening to all the analysts and their opinions. How else would they know who to draft? How many times did these TV experts meet in person with these players, how intensely did they question them, how much effort did they put in interviewing coaches, fellow players, even family members?
What secret information do these TV experts conceal to their advantage over other analysts?
Somebody that did not have the level of access that NFL scouts have scored Wright low. This "somebody" doesn't get paid to be right, their job doesn't depend on the success of these players, they have nothing to lose, their credibility takes a temporary hit and they continue to express opinion without accountability.
It would be interesting if drafts were reviewed five years later and, if an analyst was incorrect to a particular degree, they would be fired. I bet you would hear fewer opinions. There probably wouldn't be such thing as a "big board".