Is Mike McCarthy forcing Quinn to run Dan Nolans 31st ranked defense again?

Dak_Attack_09 said:

While listening to Quinn's press conference he mentioned that the defense will play 3-4 with D-Law standing up but then says majority of time it will be 4 man when it's nickel. Is he forcing defense to play 3-4 to keep injury prone Neal on the field to get a new contract?

This is a 4 man defense period if you want some flex then switch the DE out that can play OLB like Gregory, Anae, D-Law. If you want extra coverage take one of the LB who can't cover but if you have LB that can cover then it's pointless to go to nickel or dime.

Please God do not give us another season of Mike Nolans's defense.

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

While listening to Quinn's press conference he mentioned that the defense will play 3-4 with D-Law standing up but then says majority of time it will be 4 man when it's nickel. Is he forcing defense to play 3-4 to keep injury prone Neal on the field to get a new contract?

This is a 4 man defense period if you want some flex then switch the DE out that can play OLB like Gregory, Anae, D-Law. If you want extra coverage take one of the LB who can't cover but if you have LB that can cover then it's pointless to go to nickel or dime.

Please God do not give us another season of Mike Nolans's defense.

Click to expand...

jblaze2004 said:

Has Dan Quinn run a 3-4 defense before?

Click to expand...

Dak_Attack_09 said:

While listening to Quinn's press conference he mentioned that the defense will play 3-4 with D-Law standing up but then says majority of time it will be 4 man when it's nickel. Is he forcing defense to play 3-4 to keep injury prone Neal on the field to get a new contract?

This is a 4 man defense period if you want some flex then switch the DE out that can play OLB like Gregory, Anae, D-Law. If you want extra coverage take one of the LB who can't cover but if you have LB that can cover then it's pointless to go to nickel or dime.

Please God do not give us another season of Mike Nolans's defense.

Click to expand...

CyberB0b said:

The Seattle 4-3 under is essentially a 3-4 type of alignment. It's similar to what Kiffin and Ron ran here.

Click to expand...

DakPresgoat said:

No.


Next question

Click to expand...

GORICO said:

cyber bob---- hope your right man....hope you still have good reason to believe.....McCarthey is a liar who will say anything at anytime to appear good...any coach who would sign off on his buddies defense last year that is way more difficult
and different then what had been played and no time to practice but learn it on Zoom cannot be trusted....our guys had no idea what they were suppose to do because the coaching was horrible on top of it...this 6 foot 4 330 1-tech we got in 4th wont make it out of training camp....look at his stats at Kentucky....his biggest year was 18 tackles most were 9 and he played every game...but maybe i am all washed up and need to be thrown in the trash heap with Nolan?

Click to expand...

CyberB0b said:

The Seattle 4-3 under is essentially a 3-4 type of alignment. It's similar to what Kiffin and Ron ran here.

Click to expand...

CouchCoach said:

LMAO, the Joneses aren't even letting McCarthy speak to Quinn. He's lucky Quinn doesn't have his job.

Click to expand...

sbark said:

His job will be to tie up 2 oline and keep lb clean.....his agent will hate his stat line also, but if our run d improves ....a lot will be because of him and Urban.

Click to expand...

speedkilz88 said:

The Seahawks and the 4-3 Under Front: Winds of change? - Field Gulls

Click to expand...