CowboyFrog
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 11,116
- Reaction score
- 10,087
Learn to read buddy. I said post Parcells. Had Parcells stayed I’m sure we’d be not talking about how Romo couldn’t win the big one.
Also, “going Hollywood” doesn’t even mean anything. Was Romo acting? Did he give up going to practice, getting better because he was focusing on a movie career?
Romo had twenty five fourth quarter comeback victories. He was hardly a choker and was a leader on the field.
Leadership...chemistry...(or their lack thereof) are all just buzzwords that aren't given more import than they when victories or losses happen.
And going to Cabo had zero to do with the loss. That’s just talking head bull**** that was given as an impotent reason post facto.
You Romo haters are so annoying. Romo’s lack of success has nothing to do with Dak’s existence. At all. A SB victory is an ORGANIZATIONAL effort, not just a player effort. Plenty of average QBs, e.g., Trent Dilfer, Mark Rypien, Doug Williams, etc., have won SBs, and a number of great ones, e.g., Dan Marino, Dan Fouts, etc., haven't.
How many bad coaches have won SB's? I mean its hard for me to even say the Iggles SB winning coach was bad....One could almost say you need good players AND a Good coach to win one...crazy stuff...
PS: I joke about Switzer..for sure but if you know the real story you would actually know how he was a major part of them winning and how he got the job and why he really came to town and then left...