I'm not saying Dak is better than Mahomes

nyc-cowboy

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,081
Reaction score
10,683



Point 1: Mahomes played in 73 games, Dak only 56 and Dak still has him beat in 400 yard games.

Point 2: Mahomes has a god-like receiving unit. Dak has a very good receiving unit but it doesn't compare to Mahomes'. Kelce + Hill > by far anyone we got. Cowboys are receivers by committee. Chiefs have a receiving unit that have been proven unstoppable by 31 teams.

Point 3: Wins are a team accomplishment, so Mahomes didn't win those games on his own.


Again, Mahomes > Dak overall because of his Super Bowl and his postseason accomplishments, but lots of his games are simply because Chiefs are good enough to jump ahead and beat teams without Mahomes needing to do much. Cowboys has a bad defense most of the times, 0 dominant D-linemen, a used up starting running back, and an O-Line that blew the SF playoff game badly. Mahomes O-Line was horrendous in the Super Bowl, but at least they chose the last game of the year to be bad in.


Thoughts?

OK so the obvious question is what's your point...

And one question - all things being even who would you rather have Mahomes or Dak?
 

john van brocklin

Captain Comeback
Messages
38,352
Reaction score
43,248



Point 1: Mahomes played in 73 games, Dak only 56 and Dak still has him beat in 400 yard games.

Point 2: Mahomes has a god-like receiving unit. Dak has a very good receiving unit but it doesn't compare to Mahomes'. Kelce + Hill > by far anyone we got. Cowboys are receivers by committee. Chiefs have a receiving unit that have been proven unstoppable by 31 teams.

Point 3: Wins are a team accomplishment, so Mahomes didn't win those games on his own.


Again, Mahomes > Dak overall because of his Super Bowl and his postseason accomplishments, but lots of his games are simply because Chiefs are good enough to jump ahead and beat teams without Mahomes needing to do much. Cowboys has a bad defense most of the times, 0 dominant D-linemen, a used up starting running back, and an O-Line that blew the SF playoff game badly. Mahomes O-Line was horrendous in the Super Bowl, but at least they chose the last game of the year to be bad in.


Thoughts?

Glad your not saying Dak is better than Mahomes.
I would have some serious concerns for you if you did!
:muttley:
 

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,025
LOL.

The guy’s premise is that because Dak has more 400 yard passing games than Mahomes, we can make a comparison between the two. Oh and Mahomes probably is better simply because he has Kelce and Hill and Dak apparently has been throwing to mid level talent.

Oh and Steve Young wasn’t all that good, he was just lucky he was throwing to Jerry Rice.

But other then that, great posts by that guy.

Mahommes IS better than Dak. That said, any QB1 for Dallas is held to a higher standard, especially a fourth rounder making 140 million. JMO.
 

JBond

Well-Known Member
Messages
10,022
Reaction score
3,487



Point 1: Mahomes played in 73 games, Dak only 56 and Dak still has him beat in 400 yard games.

Point 2: Mahomes has a god-like receiving unit. Dak has a very good receiving unit but it doesn't compare to Mahomes'. Kelce + Hill > by far anyone we got. Cowboys are receivers by committee. Chiefs have a receiving unit that have been proven unstoppable by 31 teams.

Point 3: Wins are a team accomplishment, so Mahomes didn't win those games on his own.


Again, Mahomes > Dak overall because of his Super Bowl and his postseason accomplishments, but lots of his games are simply because Chiefs are good enough to jump ahead and beat teams without Mahomes needing to do much. Cowboys has a bad defense most of the times, 0 dominant D-linemen, a used up starting running back, and an O-Line that blew the SF playoff game badly. Mahomes O-Line was horrendous in the Super Bowl, but at least they chose the last game of the year to be bad in.


Thoughts?

Thoughts? Lol... Feed you to one of our alligators... keeping my other thoughts to myself.
 

88sAndHeartbreak

Well-Known Member
Messages
1,592
Reaction score
2,247
This thread is an example of why I will never start another Dak thread...

They are always full of people who lack reading comprehension skills, present zero evidence to back up their claims, jump to conclusions, try to misdirect, don't read your whole post, ignore facts and most importantly... have stubborn agendas eventhough sufficient facts were presented.

This thread does prove that... Dak is a very good qb, but not elite. Not better than Mahomes though.
 
Last edited:

ESisback

Well-Known Member
Messages
13,147
Reaction score
14,025
As he should be.
Yes, but if he throws for 300 yards and 4 TDs, it means nothing, while many others are applauded for doing the same thing. It’s kinda like the experts pick Dallas to lose to say, Tampa, which they do. Meanwhile, Green Bay or the Rams get upset by lesser teams, but the lead story is always “Dallas lost!”. Why?
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
36,392
Reaction score
16,982



Point 1: Mahomes played in 73 games, Dak only 56 and Dak still has him beat in 400 yard games.

Point 2: Mahomes has a god-like receiving unit. Dak has a very good receiving unit but it doesn't compare to Mahomes'. Kelce + Hill > by far anyone we got. Cowboys are receivers by committee. Chiefs have a receiving unit that have been proven unstoppable by 31 teams.

Point 3: Wins are a team accomplishment, so Mahomes didn't win those games on his own.


Again, Mahomes > Dak overall because of his Super Bowl and his postseason accomplishments, but lots of his games are simply because Chiefs are good enough to jump ahead and beat teams without Mahomes needing to do much. Cowboys has a bad defense most of the times, 0 dominant D-linemen, a used up starting running back, and an O-Line that blew the SF playoff game badly. Mahomes O-Line was horrendous in the Super Bowl, but at least they chose the last game of the year to be bad in.


Thoughts?


Mahomes 1 Super Bowl ring
Dak 1 playoff win

Reality is a turd in the only watering hole for miles.
 

GINeric

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,230
Reaction score
3,584
Statistics are extremely helpful in life; however, they are also NOTORIOUS for being a means that people use for making FALSE and MISLEADING arguments. But... keep trying, it makes me chuckle!

Stats are what sets the bar of each player's paycheck from the league minimum to the fully guaranteed max dollars. Stats are how players are paid bonuses and incentives. Stats are used to determine who has a job, who starts, and who get cut. Stats are used to determine who makes it in the Hall of Fame or not!!!

From where im sitting, stats look pretty important to me!!
 
Top