Adult Language Jason Garrett is soft and only a clapper?

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
Again, LOL. I guess you're one of those people who think if we don't have Pro Bowl players in their primes at every position, poor Jason is so disadvantaged.

Sometimes I think some Cowboys fans don't ever bother to look around the league at other rosters. Even the best teams have some holes in the cap era.

Dallas had more holes than the playoff teams. Wasn't it obvious?
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I wrote this in another thread as well, but I'm going to paste it here too.

Garrett IS the Dallas Cowboys; almost as much as the Jones family. He played quarterback for the team. He has been a coach with the team for 11 years. His father was a scout for Jerry for years (and famously was the strongest lobbiest for drafting Randy Moss - Jerry didn’t listen).

Barring an absolute catastrophe, Garrett isn’t going ANYWHERE. And this team has deep, young talent, so despite the wishes of some of the haters, a catastrophe isn’t going to happen.

It's a safe bet he at least gets to play out the current contract, yeah.

This team is actually pretty good right now. I don't understand why everybody's so upset about everything, honestly. There are lots of ways to improve it, and lots of interesting young players to continue to develop, so there's no good reason for feeling hopeless.
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
11,882
Reaction score
13,462
Ahem...





And those players were 1-7.



Then don't be sold. It's ok to disagree. I actually think this team is headed in a good direction at this moment. They have a solid group of young talent. It's time for results, though.

ALL the coaches hired AROUND JG with similar tenure. How much clearer did I need to be. When would 2003 be close to 2011? What I said was truth.

Great!!! We will see
 

Miller

ARTIST FORMERLY KNOWN AS TEXASFROG
Messages
11,882
Reaction score
13,462
That 49er defense wasn't made with bottom dwellers. Nice teams aren't good teams. If you can't see that the team literally had to be overhauled, then we'll just disagree.

The 49ers were considered the worst team in the league and hadn't been good since 2002. Why would they be richer in talent than a team that was 11-5 a year before? That is just fudging numbers. Harbaugh made a difference.
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
ALL the coaches hired AROUND JG with similar tenure. How much clearer did I need to be. When would 2003 be close to 2011? What I said was truth.

Great!!! We will see

Sorry for the misunderstanding then. I still don't think the point holds any significance going forward. Part of the reason some of those coaches are tenured with Garrett is because of those flashes in the pan. I'm just curious what happens this year.
 

TheSkaven

Last Man Standing
Messages
7,021
Reaction score
5,775
It's a safe bet he at least gets to play out the current contract, yeah.

This team is actually pretty good right now. I don't understand why everybody's so upset about everything, honestly. There are lots of ways to improve it, and lots of interesting young players to continue to develop, so there's no good reason for feeling hopeless.

EXACTLY. The negativity on this board is mind boggling. The team had a down year (9-7 season) last year because our star running back was suspended for 6 games. Does anyone remember how well the '93 team did when Emmitt held out for two games? 0-2.

The team is very good, it's young the head coach is smart and understands his players. The players are staying in the same system. We have a favorable schedule. Gentlemen, this is a playoff team at the very least, and should be one of the favorites to make a deep run.
 

Haimerej

Well-Known Member
Messages
5,083
Reaction score
6,776
The 49ers were considered the worst team in the league and hadn't been good since 2002. Why would they be richer in talent than a team that was 11-5 a year before? That is just fudging numbers. Harbaugh made a difference.

What do you mean fudging numbers? Obviously the previous coaching staff couldn't accomplish the same results as Harbaugh. If you're talking strictly numbers, Garrett took a 1-7 team to 5-3. Then he had to deal with the oline aging and falling apart. Do you remember Jerry's comment about Romo being able to avoid the rush alleviating o-line issues? Didn't Romo lobby hard for the offensive line overhaul? They made a poor DC choice in Ryan and then Garrett was finally allowed to bring the defense he wanted, which required yet another personnel overhaul. I was saying this stuff as I was watching it happen. I think a lot of fans greatly overestimate the talent of their teams.
 

lothos05

Active Member
Messages
99
Reaction score
204
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I've never been a fan of the Garrett/Landry comparisons. About the only relevant point is that Landry was given substantial time to build his team and that that's a luxury a lot of coaches have never had.

But the Joneses have been very good to Garrett in terms of giving him time to put his staff and his team together, so Jason really has no right to complain on that front.

From my perspective--and I know it's a minority opinion on the board right now--Garrett took a long time to build the team into a contender. He did it under some somewhat difficult circumstances (our cap situation wasn't good, and the CBA dropped the salary cap for a few years). He was slow to assemble a complete staff, and he made some legitimate game management mistakes along the way. But from 2014 on, he's had a system and a team capable fo competing in the NFC.

Pointing out that our team--like every other team in the league over an 8 year span--has had a handful of really good players doesn't mean anything. It's what the team hasn't had that matters. And our team has outperformed most teams during that span, anyway. Where we fall short is when we have to play other good teams in the playoffs.

I don't know that Garrett is actually the guy to get us over that hump. He's got his own limitations, but mostly he's up against an ownership culture that makes things harder than it needs to be a lot of times.

I do wish the tone when it comes to discussing the coaching around here were more rational. The 'Garrett is only a clapper' and 'Rod Marinelli doesn't understand defense' stuff makes it hard to engage seriously in the topic. We've got a 10-11 win team or so. We've had one for a couple of years now. It's spanned two different QBs and a lot of different players. It's not an accident. It's not in spite of the coaches. It's certainly not because the organization is overcoming that deficiency by loading the roster with talent. The team and the staff are 'pretty good.' Trying to become 'really good.' I'd like to see them try by making the talent on defense better.

We've got two years to see it. If not, the HC, and probably the QB, will be blown up and we'll get to see Jerry try his hand at a ground-up rebuild again. That should make everybody here happy. For about a week.

Just looking at record alone - that record vs. winning teams (or teams with a .500 record or better) needs to improve in the regular season as well.

Over Garrett's tenure, Dallas is 25-44 vs teams that are .500 or better.

If we take a look at the line of demarcation - 2014, they are 17-20 (16-13 with starting QB). It's much improved over the 8-24 record from 2010-2013 but needs to get better. By comparison (at least from that article that was posted stating the Dallas wins 71% of their games with its starting QB since 2014), the team ahead of Dallas is 27-8.

To add, another area that has improved where I believe it's important is finishing the season. From 2010-2013, Dallas was 8-11 in December/January. It's reversed now being 11-7 (10-3 sticking to the starting QB record since 2014 where they could only manage a 1-4 record with the back-ups in 2015).
 

DallasCowboys2080

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,864
Reaction score
2,781

Italian-Sub-Sandwich.jpg
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Just looking at record alone - that record vs. winning teams (or teams with a .500 record or better) needs to improve in the regular season as well.

Over Garrett's tenure, Dallas is 25-44 vs teams that are .500 or better.

If we take a look at the line of demarcation - 2014, they are 17-20 (16-13 with starting QB). It's much improved over the 8-24 record from 2010-2013 but needs to get better. By comparison (at least from that article that was posted stating the Dallas wins 71% of their games with its starting QB since 2014), the team ahead of Dallas is 27-8.

To add, another area that has improved where I believe it's important is finishing the season. From 2010-2013, Dallas was 8-11 in December/January. It's reversed now being 11-7 (10-3 sticking to the starting QB record since 2014 where they could only manage a 1-4 record with the back-ups in 2015).

Thanks for the numbers.

I think that's where the rubber meets the road for a lot of fans who don't like Garrett. His teams beat the teams they're supposed to beat, but tend to struggle against legitimately good teams. On the one hand, that's expected (good teams are good for a reason). It's also consistent and what you'd like to see in terms of the pattern of winning for a team you're building. The question is, why haven't we been able to beat the best teams at a higher rate?

Everybody knows I look at what we've done on defense and see the whiffs on players like Claiborne and Gregory and Jaylon, and look at what we don't do in FA (Hitchens, Weddle, Zack Brown) and instead try to get lucky with long shots on players like Hardy or R. McClain and conclude we're spending too little on that side of the ball in terms fo salary dollars and premium draft resources. Others look at it and say it's a coaching problem. To me, it's pretty obvious when you look at the data that the defense overall and the defensive breakdowns in the playoffs in particular are what's getting us beat. I don't see opposing coaches pulling the wool over anybody's eyes. I just see great QBs with too much time to throw and a secondary that can't take the ball away enough.
 

DallasCowboys2080

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,864
Reaction score
2,781
. To me, it's pretty obvious when you look at the data that the defense overall and the defensive breakdowns in the playoffs in particular are what's getting us beat. I don't see opposing coaches pulling the wool over anybody's eyes. I just see great QBs with too much time to throw and a secondary that can't take the ball away enough.


It's been a very loooooong time since the Cowboys had a defense that scared anyone. Why? Team has been offensive centric for awhile. Does Jason Garrett play into this?
 

Idgit

Fattening up
Staff member
Messages
58,971
Reaction score
60,826
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
It's been a very loooooong time since the Cowboys had a defense that scared anyone. Why? Team has been offensive centric for awhile. Does Jason Garrett play into this?

I’m sure Garrett could gat it addressed if he stood on the table for it. They made an effort to address it in last year’s draft. We’ll see what they do with the top picks this year.
 

lothos05

Active Member
Messages
99
Reaction score
204
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Thanks for the numbers.

I think that's where the rubber meets the road for a lot of fans who don't like Garrett. His teams beat the teams they're supposed to beat, but tend to struggle against legitimately good teams. On the one hand, that's expected (good teams are good for a reason). It's also consistent and what you'd like to see in terms of the pattern of winning for a team you're building. The question is, why haven't we been able to beat the best teams at a higher rate?

Everybody knows I look at what we've done on defense and see the whiffs on players like Claiborne and Gregory and Jaylon, and look at what we don't do in FA (Hitchens, Weddle, Zack Brown) and instead try to get lucky with long shots on players like Hardy or R. McClain and conclude we're spending too little on that side of the ball in terms fo salary dollars and premium draft resources. Others look at it and say it's a coaching problem. To me, it's pretty obvious when you look at the data that the defense overall and the defensive breakdowns in the playoffs in particular are what's getting us beat. I don't see opposing coaches pulling the wool over anybody's eyes. I just see great QBs with too much time to throw and a secondary that can't take the ball away enough.

Usually, in those games against the better teams, our o-line has protection issues while the D can't close out teams (in case it wasn't a rhetorical question). The results were better in 2016 and for half of 2017 until that charlie foxtrot of a game in Atlanta and onward, but I'm still encouraged by the improvement.

I agree that the D will continue to cost us until they can evaluate, draft and develop as effectively as they do on the other side of the ball. re the 2017 playoff game vs GB and the (mental) breakdowns on D, man do they really occur at inopportune times --> Mayowa with his head up his butt in the backfield while the D is substituting (lead to a TD) and when Brown gets called for PI in the 4th Q (negated a turnover).
 

cowboyblue22

Well-Known Member
Messages
9,934
Reaction score
8,613
same as always over the last few years for the cowboys win some regular season games and not make the playoffs or make the playoffs and be one and done some fans and the front office making excuses why they don't win yet a team loses some key players and goes on to win the super bowl they are what they are a middle of the road team with a middle of the road coaching staff and front office
 
Top