casmith07;2474735 said:NYG finished their regular season with a 10-6 record last year and backed into the playoffs.
I'm not saying that's what we should shoot for, but never say never.
casmith07;2474735 said:NYG finished their regular season with a 10-6 record last year and backed into the playoffs.
I'm not saying that's what we should shoot for, but never say never.
Portland Fanatic;2474753 said:Like Madden said...if we win we deserve to be in, if we don't we don't deserve to be in the playoffs.
The Steelers are fighting for their division, are they not playing with emotion?Boysboy;2474754 said:Not so sure...
They started off Dec w/ 2 road wins against Chicago and Philly, both of whom were fighting for their playoff lives as well. Then 2 weeks later, they had another impressive road win against Buffalo, a team playing with alot of emotion with Kevin Everett on the sidelines for the first time since wk1.
Sandwiched in was an ugly loss at home to the Skins-well...the Skins were playing with alot of emotion after Sean Taylor died. The Skins themselves had an incredible stretch run to end the season.
By the time they played the Pats in wk17, the game was meaningless, but they played their butts off nonetheless.
Yes-they ended the reg season strongly, unlike us.
casmith07;2474760 said:Always have to thank John Madden for being John Obvious haha
Hoofbite;2474740 said:New York didn't back into anything. They were riding as high as any team could be except for the pats. They were on a tear and had won big games on the road leading up to their playoff appearance.
Giants clinched their playoff spot in week 16 against Buffalo and had a meaningless game against the Pats in week 17. How is that backing in when they clinched a spot in week 16?casmith07;2474735 said:NYG finished their regular season with a 10-6 record last year and backed into the playoffs.
I'm not saying that's what we should shoot for, but never say never.
GMen86;2475156 said:Giants clinched their playoff spot in week 16 against Buffalo and had a meaningless game against the Pats in week 17. How is that backing in when they clinched a spot in week 16?
IMO backing in is when you blew controling your own destiny and are depending on another team(s) to lose to get in.
Hence the "IMO" before my definition of backing in.AdamJT13;2475169 said:Maybe he's referring to the way they started 6-2, then went 4-4 in the second half of the season (or 4-3 if you don't count the Patriots game).
There are other ways to "back into" the playoffs. It's not like it's a technical term with a specific definition.
GMen86;2475186 said:Hence the "IMO" before my definition of backing in.
AdamJT13;2474861 said:L-W-L-W-W-L-W-L, with all four losses coming at home -- three by double digits and one when they blew a 12-point lead late in the third quarter -- and only one win coming by more than a touchdown, is "riding high"?
Yeah, the Giants were riding SO high leading up to their playoff appearance that they were underdogs against the 9-7 Buccaneers in their first playoff game.
Fair enough.AdamJT13;2475189 said:So why question someone else's definition?