I'm basing it on recent past performance, obviously. It is not a very difficult argument to make unless you are mostly ignorant of what other teams have at the position which seems to be the case here. Your assessment of hurns is laughable. Common, he hasn't done anything in 3 years and was cut by a team with no real depth at the position. Your assessment of Gallup is a best case scenerio and wishful thinking at this point. Basing assessments on what you HOPE someone MIGHT do cannot be taken seriously.