Alexander said:If we draft on the line, I would prefer it to be offensive line. I would take any of five or six different OGs over Gabe Watson from a value perspective.
We could hit NT late in the draft and get a good enough player to throw into the mix with Thomas Johnson and Jay Ratliff.
MichaelWinicki said:Spencer, G, Pitt.
dannyboy said:I would like David Joseph as he is good and versatile(played OT as well)
Portland Fanatic said:I'm hoping Gabe Watson slides...take Wimbley in the first. I'd be fine with a Ko Simpson, but would rather get a clogger or top olineman.
aznhalf said:I think Jason Allen slides and we scope him up in the second after tacking a LB in the first.
The status of Peterman may decide if we go OG or not. Those who really know if we are counting on him are not talking. Then there is the Kosier signing. If Rivera and Kosier are starting and Peterman is deemed dependable to handle the backup job, we won't go OG day one.Dion2288 said:I hope we take a guard in the 2nd. I hope it's Gean-Jiles or Lutui. Would love to hear your opinions regarding these two beasts. I never paid attention to Gean-Jiles. Only saw Lutui in the Rose Bowl and remember thinking he's LA's replacement. Thoughts
I'll pass. We don't need another lazy, overrated, under achieving LT on our team.123456 said:Jon Scott LT Texas.
If we laned Spencer or Joseph in the 2nd I would be absolutely thrilled.jeff said:I'm thinking Charles Spencer in the 2nd would be a great pick. Big, fairly quick, supposedly pulls better than Max Jean-Giles.
Alexander said:I would hope it isn't Spitz or Chester in the second round. Those would both be terrible choices. In the third or optimally fourth is where I think those two have value. But absolutely not at 49.