Your best run defender is DLaw and 3-4 will turn him into your worst run defender. Shut this nonsense down and end thread. Good bye.Dlaw Haskins Watkins on the line
Parsons Sam Williams on outside
Lve Clark in the middle
change my mind
mods please put stop……couple high noons in already
Makes perfect sense. Then tell us genius what you would do. I guess status quo. Your basically putting 5 dlineman out there doing what I say it would help tremendously. We never had a bad run d in a 3-4.Your best run defender is DLaw and 3-4 will turn him into your worst run defender. Shut this nonsense down and end thread. Good bye.
Dlaw Haskins Watkins on the line
Parsons Sam Williams on outside
Lve Clark in the middle
change my mind
mods please put stop……couple high noons in already
How many of those outside guys had healthy long careers for Pitt through the years. It’s the best spot for the best defender.Makes sense to me. Would like to see the DEF built around Parsons at OLB.
Dlaw isn’t a 34 DE and would become a major run liability in the scheme, Hankins days of handling the amount of snaps as a starter are long gone, we’re better with Galimore and OSA playing 3tech than what Watkins is as a 34 end. If Williams had any coverage ability Miss st would have had him playing OLB instead of as an undersized liability against the run 34 end. Clark needs a training camp. LVE isn’t near physical enough playing in this 43, he’s liable to wet his pants just thinking of the physicality of a 34. We spent the last 2 years drafting players for Quinn’s 43 under, only player that 34 really fits as a quality starter is Micah, with maybe OSA and considering he played nose in that scheme at UCLA, Jerry might be liable to decide that’s where he wants him!Dlaw Haskins Watkins on the line
Parsons Sam Williams on outside
Lve Clark in the middle
change my mind
mods please put stop……couple high noons in already
Dlaw Haskins Watkins on the line
Parsons Sam Williams on outside
Lve Clark in the middle
change my mind
mods please put stop……couple high noons in already
Let me tell you something buddy. Cowboys fan to cowboys fan. There is no fix for this team. If it’s not the run, it’ll be the secondary. If it’s not the secondary, it’ll be the offense. If it’s not the offense, it’ll be special teams. It’s always something. Try and stop the run all you want, but other problems will arise.
Dlaw Haskins Watkins on the line
Parsons Sam Williams on outside
Lve Clark in the middle
change my mind
mods please put stop……couple high noons in already
Just because something is doom and gloom doesn’t mean you give up. many posters here suggest I jump ship because I “hate” and “criticize”, or “troll” according to some. But again, just because it’s storming outside doesn’t mean you flee. You weather the storm. Same for the Cowboys. Even though they piss me off to high heavens I cannot not care for this team. I’m too attached.I'd love to have us switch to that, and I've been calling for that for a while with Parsons. We have a 3-4 favourable defence.
Then tell me, what's the point? If all's doom and gloom, what's the point? I'm not ditching, I'm just curious.
This is the opposite of the smartest idea I have ever heard.
Cause ur a homerThis is the opposite of the smartest idea I have ever heard.
Even though they piss me off to high heavens I cannot not care for this team.
Let me tell you something buddy. Cowboys fan to cowboys fan. There is no fix for this team. If it’s not the run, it’ll be the secondary. If it’s not the secondary, it’ll be the offense. If it’s not the offense, it’ll be special teams. It’s always something. Try and stop the run all you want, but other problems will arise.
Just because something is doom and gloom doesn’t mean you give up. many posters here suggest I jump ship because I “hate” and “criticize”, or “troll” according to some. But again, just because it’s storming outside doesn’t mean you flee. You weather the storm. Same for the Cowboys. Even though they piss me off to high heavens I cannot not care for this team. I’m too attached.
How exactly did I perform a Freudian slip?Freud·i·an slip
/ˌfroidēən ˈslip/noun
1. an unintentional error regarded as revealing subconscious feelings.
I knew it!
Just one, brother, just one. I'm still waiting for you to show me a positive post from you. Come on come on! Let's go, chop chop!!