Ichill2;2957321 said:If we won 5 superbowls with the 4-3 defense why are we using the 3-4 now? Its going to be a long season. If we are going to give up 400 yds per game we will not make the playoffs.
Maikeru-sama;2957345 said:No it isn't.
There are plenty of teams that are having success with the 3-4 Defense.
Like the 4-3 formation, what separates great 3-4 from mediocre ones is leadership, talent and coaching.
ZenItRam;2957364 said:Giving up 427 yards of offense is simply horrible. Short field or not, there's something wrong with the Dallas defense - period.
ZenItRam;2957364 said:Giving up 427 yards of offense is simply horrible. Short field or not, there's something wrong with the Dallas defense - period.
dbair1967;2957368 said:and thats a week after giving up 450
Doomsday101;2957373 said:When the offense accounts for 24 points scored by the Giants I'm a bit more upset with them. Yards do not win games points do and Dallas defense did a pretty good job of keeping NY out of the endzone. This is not to say the defense needs to do a better job I agree but the offense put them in bad situations through out the night.
dbair1967;2957368 said:and thats a week after giving up 450
lspain1;2957387 said:I understand your point but I'll disagree. Yes the offense, and specifically Tony Romo, had turnover problems. That said, our corners looked BAD. They were beaten deep and they tackled poorly (Scandrick, the whiffer, anyone?). The defense DID contribute to this loss and should not be given a pass.
Doomsday101;2957373 said:When the offense accounts for 24 points scored by the Giants I'm a bit more upset with them. Yards do not win games points do and Dallas defense did a pretty good job of keeping NY out of the endzone. This is not to say the defense needs to do a better job I agree but the offense put them in bad situations through out the night.
ZenItRam;2957402 said:Point taken, however the offense was able to the ONE defensive stathe game in the defense's hands and the folded cheap suite. nd at the end of the game would have won it, I'm sure of it. I'm not sure that reducing the number of turnovers by ONE would have had the same impact.
DBOY3141;2957391 said:I don't want to hear about the offense's turn-overs. Just because they turn it over, doesn't mean the defense has to allow them to score every time. Stop someone for god's sake.
Doomsday101;2957411 said:I agree but you keep your defense out on the field as much as they were due in large part because of TO it is going to wear on a defense. That Giants team is still one of the better teams in the league and giving them the ball as we did will normally lead to a loss. I know people want to act like the Giants are some slum team they are not and you can't win games when you turn the ball over 4 times ask any damn coach out there and they will say the same thing you can't win if you are turning the ball over!!!