3-4 Dline sack numbers

windward

NFL Historian
Messages
18,895
Reaction score
4,689
San Diego - 13.5
New England 20.5
Pittsburgh-9.5
Dallas- 9.5
Cleveland- 6


I guess this shows we're not as abysmal in that area as many make out.The guys are good against the run, but considering that Canty and Spears have a sack each compared to Ratliff's 4, one has to wonder if we should play Ratliff more.

It's too early to call either Spears or Canty a bust, but it's not unreasonable to hope for better production (whether that come with a change of scheme , who knows.)
 
are those sack totals or are they sacks from the 3-4 D alignment? SO, if Ratliif gets a sack out of a Nickle set then that makes the limited production out of the 3-4 set okay?
 
windward;1227580 said:
San Diego - 13.5
New England 20.5
Pittsburgh-9.5
Dallas- 9.5
Cleveland- 6


I guess this shows we're not as abysmal in that area as many make out.The guys are good against the run, but considering that Canty and Spears have a sack each compared to Ratliff's 4, one has to wonder if we should play Ratliff more.

It's too early to call either Spears or Canty a bust, but it's not unreasonable to hope for better production (whether that come with a change of scheme , who knows.)



It is misleading using simply the sack numbers of all defensive lineman of baase 3-4 teams. Almost all the Cowboys' 9.5 have actually come from a four man nickel front.
 
StanleySpadowski;1227717 said:
It is misleading using simply the sack numbers of all defensive lineman of baase 3-4 teams. Almost all the Cowboys' 9.5 have actually come from a four man nickel front.
yeah I guess so. Of course that leads to the question of how many sacks the other team got from a base 3-4 alignment and whether getting sacks in such a formation is inherently difficult in that system.
 
A little more of this would be nice.

http://img225.*************/img225/1037/4217673120ig4.jpg
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
465,067
Messages
13,846,937
Members
23,786
Latest member
waycooljr
Back
Top