3 first rounders, 1 third rounder, 2 starters for Wilson

[Flamma]

Possibly, but if your Seattle and you trade Wilson you are obviously rebuilding. If I can get 40 million over in my first season of the rebuild, thats not a bad option. I actually dont know why teams dont use that strategy more often.

Yeah, that would be exactly the time to do it. Add in all those extra picks and they're in an ideal rebuild situation.

 

[Kingofholland]

No one player can be worth all that. surely.

Agreed, you're essientially trading 1 strater for 5..

 

[BobbyFlame469]

I seriously don't know what these teams think they are going to accomplish with a trade like that because it's a terrible football decision.

Patrick Mahomes is probably the only QB you could get away with doing a trade like that for because of his youth because that is going to set your team back bigtime.

Seahawks are a 4-12 team that Wilson keeps 12-4.

 

[BobbyFlame469]

100% Chicago would have paid Dak $40M in FA.

Actually more.

nfl.com had dak earning 42M per from several teams

 

[Motorola]

Agreed, you're essientially trading 1 strater for 5..

Back in the 20th century - pre 1970s - I believe there were a few trades similar to that in both baseball and football... more so in baseball.

 

[TheMarathonContinues]

I seriously don't know what these teams think they are going to accomplish with a trade like that because it's a terrible football decision.

Patrick Mahomes is probably the only QB you could get away with doing a trade like that for because of his youth because that is going to set your team back bigtime.

Rams haven't had a pick since 2016.....hasn't really hurt them.

 

[CATCH17]

Seahawks are a 4-12 team that Wilson keeps 12-4.

What on earth would make you respond to my post with a crap post like this?

I’m factoring in the lack of resources Chicago would have to upgrade the team or did that bit escape you?

 

[Kwyn]

ESPN is just reporting that Chicago offered Seattle that package for Wilson and Seattle turned it down.

Would you have taken the deal or kept Wilson?

seahawks are suckers

according to CZ posters, with that haul from the Bears you are guaranteed to get the next Mahomes, Donald and Ramsey with a Honey Badger and Tyreek Hill with the later round picks

 

[FLWarpigrpig]

This smells like a an "honest effort" to get better for your organization and fans. Chicago knows Seattle really can't take the cap hit. So it allows them to say "look we really tried, oh well let's get ready for the new season with what we got." Go Team

 

[DandyDon52]

ESPN is just reporting that Chicago offered Seattle that package for Wilson and Seattle turned it down.

Would you have taken the deal or kept Wilson?

Seattle should have taken that deal, and chicago was stupid to offer that much.

 

[Adreme]

I seriously don't know what these teams think they are going to accomplish with a trade like that because it's a terrible football decision.

Patrick Mahomes is probably the only QB you could get away with doing a trade like that for because of his youth because that is going to set your team back bigtime.

I mean it sounds high, but it actually makes some sense. If you are trying to find a franchise QB, then you are looking at, on average, 3 first round picks. Wilson is better than a regular franchise QB, and is somewhat cheap for the next 3 years, so that also boosts the price. When you think of it that way, it’s actually a bargain.

 

[gjkoeppen]

ESPN is just reporting that Chicago offered Seattle that package for Wilson and Seattle turned it down.

Would you have taken the deal or kept Wilson?

And how many times have reporters said or written something that was absolutely not true? I very seriously doubt anyone who had first hand knowledge of any trade discussions would go public with what was offered and turned down. There would be those that would criticize both sides. The bears for offering that much and Seattle for not accepting all those picks and players.
.
.

 

[ghst187]

If the starters we send are Jaylon Smith and Connor Williams....

 

[BigStar]

I seriously don't know what these teams think they are going to accomplish with a trade like that because it's a terrible football decision.

Patrick Mahomes is probably the only QB you could get away with doing a trade like that for because of his youth because that is going to set your team back bigtime.

I think the Rams/PHI types give them confidence to go nuts. They have and still are competitive even after spending so much; PHI not so much but really in this division I wouldn't be surprised if they win it if Hurts is any kind of player.

 

[Cebrin]

If I'm Seattle I turn that down too. They play in a better division than ours, and still made the playoffs. They've less holes to fill to get where they need to go.

 

[DeaconMoss]

That trade is more moronic then signing Dak and that's saying something.

Bears and Dallas. Two teams that dont have a clue.

 

[conner01]

ESPN is just reporting that Chicago offered Seattle that package for Wilson and Seattle turned it down.

Would you have taken the deal or kept Wilson?

Taken it, yes
Given it, no way