44-6/34-3

Switz · Jan 18, 2010

Final Scores of our last game of the season the past two years.

This says something about the coaching Staff..

at some point in each of these games the team gave up. That is on the General... like in War... the General = the coaching staff

it is true

casmith07 · Jan 18, 2010

Thread # 4,587,134 on the coaching staff.

Thanks.

jimmy40 · Jan 18, 2010

Switz;3241014 said:
Final Scores of our last game of the season the past two years.

This says something about the coaching Staff..

at some point in each of these games the team gave up. That is on the General... like in War... the General = the coaching staff

it is true

Yea, we're getting better. 0-24 in next year's NFC Championship?

Switz · Jan 18, 2010

casmith07;3241018 said:
Thread # 4,587,134 on the coaching staff.

Thanks.

seems we need more threads about a major issue then :lmao2:

jgboys1 · Jan 18, 2010

jimmy40;3241026 said:
Yea, we're getting better. 0-24 in next year's NFC Championship?

I'll take it.

alancdc · Jan 18, 2010

I don't think it says anything about the staff no more than Arizona losing to the SAINTS is some huge indictment on the staff. We got beat by a team playing at home that dominated the line. DALLAS blew chances early with some sacks and missed FG's and couldn't get going again.

Brooksey · Jan 18, 2010

Switz;3241014 said:
Final Scores of our last game of the season the past two years.

This says something about the coaching Staff..

at some point in each of these games the team gave up. That is on the General... like in War... the General = the coaching staff

it is true

You make a good point. Too much talent oin the field to get blown out 34-3.

.

LittleBoyBlue · Jan 18, 2010

Switz;3241014 said:
Final Scores of our last game of the season the past two years.

This says something about the coaching Staff..

at some point in each of these games the team gave up. That is on the General... like in War... the General = the coaching staff

it is true

There is NOTHING wrong with starting this thread.

brooksey1;3241050 said:
You make a good point. Too much talent oin the field to get blown out 34-3.

.

This is why!

Mansta54 · Jan 18, 2010

Switz;3241014 said:
Final Scores of our last game of the season the past two years.

This says something about the coaching Staff..

at some point in each of these games the team gave up. That is on the General... like in War... the General = the coaching staff

it is true

So untrue!!! Because you get beat doesn't mean you gave up. The Vikes Dline whupped our Oline, giving up had nothing to do with it. That's just stupid!!!

sonnyboy · Jan 18, 2010

Mansta54;3241065 said:
So untrue!!! Because you get beat doesn't mean you gave up. The Vikes Dline whupped our Oline, giving up had nothing to do with it. That's just stupid!!!

We didn't give up. I hate this BS response I have to read over and over from people who just don't know WTH they're talking about.

sonnyboy · Jan 18, 2010

We got beat for a number of reasons and none of them had to do with effort.

It's funny but I'm affraid I may have jinked us. In breaking down the game with a friend I made referrence to one of my greatest fears that always pops up when I think we're the bettert team in a key game.

It's the one thing you can't account for in an analysis and often comes into play.

IN GAME INJURIES.

Sounds like sour grapes, but Adams going down was soo bad once it was established that Columbo wasn't 100%.
You just know Free would've replaced Columbo and the entire game plays out differently.

I'm not saying we would've won, because we had other OL issues. I just know it would've been one hell of a game decided late.

alancdc · Jan 18, 2010

sonnyboy;3241079 said:
We didn't give up. I hate this BS response I have to read over and over from people who just don't know WTH they're talking about.

Agree, our defense was put in some bad spots with turnovers, and were on hte field too long. It was still 17-3 in the 3rd quarter so I don't think effort had anything to do with it eitehr. Fact is, Favre freakin' threw 2 TD passes that were PERFECT. He was under pressure, but unlike us, he got passes off just before being hit several times. He was great yesterday and that's about it.

Switz · Jan 18, 2010

sonnyboy;3241103 said:
We got beat for a number of reasons and none of them had to do with effort.

It's funny but I'm affraid I may have jinked us. In breaking down the game with a friend I made referrence to one of my greatest fears that always pops up when I think we're the bettert team in a key game.

It's the one thing you can't account for in an analysis and often comes into play.

IN GAME INJURIES.

Sounds like sour grapes, but Adams going down was soo bad once it was established that Columbo wasn't 100%.
You just know Free would've replaced Columbo and the entire game plays out differently.

I'm not saying we would've won, because we had other OL issues. I just know it would've been one hell of a game decided late.

lets blame injuries.. yet the colts who secondard has been hurt al season yet they keep winning.. wonder how.

ETex · Jan 18, 2010

Switz;3241014 said:
Final Scores of our last game of the season the past two years.

This says something about the coaching Staff..

at some point in each of these games the team gave up. That is on the General... like in War... the General = the coaching staff

it is true

RealCowboyfan · Jan 18, 2010

I just believe that Romo should've been in more two-tight end sets and more max protects. They should've treated this like the Eagles. BLITZ happy team.

Hook'em#11 · Jan 18, 2010

The give up reason/excuse is just as sorry and pitiful as the injury excuse.

They got beat in every phase of the game. Dominated no less.

sonnyboy · Jan 18, 2010

Switz;3241133 said:
lets blame injuries.. yet the colts who secondard has been hurt al season yet they keep winning.. wonder how.

No excuses made. It's a valid reason for the OL underperforming. Not saying it's acceptable. We sould have better back-ups. It's jsut that we don't.

wileedog · Jan 18, 2010

sonnyboy;3241371 said:
No excuses made. It's a valid reason for the OL underperforming. Not saying it's acceptable. We sould have better back-ups. It's jsut that we don't.

The interior line got whipped as bad as the tackles. That's half the reason Romo had so much trouble, there was no room to step up to avoid the rush.

Blaming that performance on one injury is just not accurate. The whole line was putrid.

sonnyboy · Jan 18, 2010

Hook'em#11;3241364 said:
The give up reason/excuse is just as sorry and pitiful as the injury excuse.

They got beat in every phase of the game. Dominated no less.

No it isn't. The give up/no heart excuse is just a gut reaction from a crying fan who can't understand how and why things happen on a football field.

Injuries are never an excuse but often a valid reason or explanation for why some teams succeed and others fail.

Many fans can't except this simple fact, because that can't handle the uncertainty of it.

They need certainty and more importantly, someone to blame for thier hurt feelings.

wileedog · Jan 18, 2010

sonnyboy;3241389 said:
No it isn't. The give up/no heart excuse is just a gut reaction from a crying fan who can't understand how and why things happen on a football field.

Injuries are never an excuse but often a valid reason or explanation for why some teams succeed and others fail.

Many fans can't except this simple fact, because that can't handle the uncertainty of it.

They need certainty and more importantly, someone to blame for thier hurt feelings.

44-6/34-3

Member

Attorney-at-Zone

Well-Known Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Redvolution

Well-Known Member

Benched

Benched

Active Member

Member

Member

Championship

Well-Known Member

Benched

Well-Known Member

Benched

Well-Known Member