5 deepest teams in the leagues?

SkinsHokieFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,469
Reaction score
240
Audiman;2152334 said:
Newsflash: none of your STARTERS are all-pro. most of our backups are better than your starters.

Yea, I'd really like to take any of your WR's not named TO over Santana Moss






Audiman;2152334 said:
none of them are under 30.they'll wear down quite a bit.

O-lineman tend to play fine well into their 30s. Freakish injuries derailed Jansen and Thomas last year


Audiman;2152334 said:
Portis ran well against weak teams and Betts has a fumbling problem. I'd much rather have Barber and an unproven rookie with tons of potential any day of the week.

Homerific post of the year. We played the SAME TEAMS last season :bang2:


Audiman;2152334 said:
how can they perform well if you don't have a QB that can throw?

He seemed to throw just fine against your secondary (300+ yards 2 TD's)


Audiman;2152334 said:
we need names. I can't think of anyone important...

Typical Cowboy fan intelligence right there. We need names!!!


Audiman;2152334 said:
I'd rather be stacked with guys that can get the job done for a long period of time.

Me too. Those are called starters
 

bsheeern

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,071
Reaction score
422
SkinsHokieFan;2151961 said:
Where the Commanders lack depth is at linebacker and corner, until McIntosh and Rogers prove themselves to be healthy again
What about safety? No depth there. That was proven last year when they lost shawn.
Also D-line depth has no real rotation to it. Also proven last year. Adding Taylor and losing Daniels doesn't add any depth to the team, just more talent to the D-Front starters.
Most of your Defense lacks depth.
 

bsheeern

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,071
Reaction score
422
SkinsHokieFan;2151961 said:
Portis, Betts> Barber, and Felix Jones (an unproven rookie if you choose to make that argument)

WR's and TE's remains to be seen with how the rookies perform
So we have an unproven rookie at running back, but wr and te are classified as "remain to be seen" because of rookies......hmmmmmmmm:bang2:
Also to let you in on some inside info. I went to High School with Maurice Hicks. Just saw him over the spring as well. He's about 5'11 and weighs about 205 after thanksgiving dinner. I doubt he is the backup at center for the Vikings as Kirwin has him listed in this article/analysis. Just food for thought.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,921
Reaction score
17,113
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
redskins1;2152153 said:
great article,i totally agree!!:)


If there were a way to prove it, I would bet that you did not even read the whole article, you just saw the Commanders in the list and "great article,i totally agree!!"

From knowing your posts, you don't have the brain power to read that many words, much less comprehend what it says...! Troll.....!


:rolleyes: :cool:
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
SkinsHokieFan;2152428 said:
Yea, I'd really like to take any of your WR's not named TO over Santana Moss

I'd like to point out that our #1 tight end put up a lot better stats than your #1 reciever.

O-lineman tend to play fine well into their 30s. Freakish injuries derailed Jansen and Thomas last year

do you not understand that the older you get, the more injury prone you are? good luck with your O-line though. I'm sure they'll beat our probowlers

Homerific post of the year. We played the SAME TEAMS last season :bang2:

ok, but I find it funny how our RB tandem from last year was just as productive with the other Jones. I personally think Felix Jones is far better than Julius and Barber(in time). the Commanders only have one decently productive RB. the only reason he was that productive last year is because Campbell can't throw.

He seemed to throw just fine against your secondary (300+ yards 2 TD's)

300+ yds and 2 TDs is just fine against a teams biggest weakness?

for reference, Romo threw for more yards and TDs in the '06 season and Jason Campbell did all of last years. good try though.

Typical Cowboy fan intelligence right there. We need names!!!

good come back on that one! can you even name anyone?
 

Audiman

New Member
Messages
750
Reaction score
0
some Commanders fan said:
Is it stacked with all pro guys? Nope, but it is guys who can come in and get the job done for a short period.

Audiman said:
I'd rather be stacked with guys that can get the job done for a long period of time.
SkinsHokieFan;2152428 said:
Me too. Those are called starters

so, basically what you're saying is...the Commanders don't have any starters? :lmao:
 

tomson75

Brain Dead Shill
Messages
16,720
Reaction score
1
Audiman;2152522 said:
300+ yds and 2 TDs is just fine against a teams biggest weakness?

for reference, Romo threw for more yards and TDs in the '06 season and Jason Campbell did all of last years. good try though.

Or...

SkinsHokieFan;2152428 said:
He seemed to throw just fine against your secondary (300+ yards 2 TD's)

I love how you neglect to point out that it took him FIFTY FOUR (54) pass attempts to do so....and then left off his INT.

I'm sure your selectivity also allows you to easily forget that both of our starting CB's were injured for that game...although Newman still took one from your Quincy Carter clone in the fourth....while injured.

Selective memories are neat.
 

5Stars

Here comes the Sun...
Messages
37,921
Reaction score
17,113
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Audiman;2152529 said:
so, basically what you're saying is...the Commanders don't have any starters? :lmao:


Those Three Stooges don't know what they are saying...!! Each of them contradict the others!!

:laugh2: :laugh2:
 

SkinsHokieFan

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,469
Reaction score
240
Audiman;2152529 said:
so, basically what you're saying is...the Commanders don't have any starters? :lmao:

Yup, since we are talking about depth guys and you know backups

Starter wise, the 'Boys have better across the board talent. Its not that hard to see.

Will it produce in the clutch, barring injuries? It should, or else it'll be another classic Cowboy choke job
 

Bob Sacamano

Benched
Messages
57,084
Reaction score
3
Audiman;2152522 said:
do you not understand that the older you get, the more injury prone you are? good luck with your O-line though. I'm sure they'll beat our probowlers

not to mention Jansen has been injury prone for the past couple of years, it's not looking up for him regarding his health

I'd call Portis/Betts and Barber/Jones a wash, because Barber was more effective than Portis w/ the carries that he had, and Betts was downright awful last year, I'd put him at a rookie's level, and his potential isn't near Felix Jones' to be better

the only conceivable position that Washington has more depth is back up QB and WR, only because they invested 2, 2nd round picks in the position, while we're developing a 4th rounder and former UFAs, but their backup QB is arguably better than their starter, while our starting QB is the returning, 2nd leading passer in the entire NFL
 
Top