5 year cap impact for signing top FA CB, WR and replacing Free

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
It works! With the massive cap space in 2019 and later, the team is able to add 2 top FA this year while replacing Free with a top available RT (Wagner). WR candidates would be Jackson and Pryor.

The actual cap table is in: http://www.bloggingtheboys.com/2017...021-cap-impact-of-signing-top-fa-wr-and-fa-cb

The 2 FAs are assumed to be 4 year contracts with $12M AAV and $15M signing bonus. The shown cap structure of these contracts assumed only 1 restructure during year 2. Wagner RT contract is 4 years with $8M AAV and $12M signing bonus again only with 1 restructure during year 2.

These signings do not blow up the cap, but actually have surpluses. Per cap rules, surplus every year is rolled into the next year. Not only is the cap in good shape, the cap space allows restructuring to be limited to once per new contract. The annual restructures of top contracts like Tsmith and Tfred are eliminated after 2017. After 2021, restructuring would likely be required again as Dak/Zeke/class of 2016 draft contracts hit their max impact. The model assumes the conservative position that the cap stops rising from a new TV contract, and that most of the class becomes good starters/probowlers. If that happens, then the team would be based on ~10 probowlers.

This assumes Mo, Carr, Wilcox and Church are not kept - as Jerry suggested only 2 positions must be addressed before the draft (implying CB, WR). Also Free is replaced with Wagner. All of Romo's dead money is applied in 2017.

Rookie pools are accounted for with 10% increase assumed every year.

To adjust for # of players under contract, the model follows rule 51.

In terms of our own FAs, these are the ones kept:
2017: Mcclain, Moore, McFadden and Irving.
2018: Martin, Collins, Wilson
2019: Jones
2020: Beasley, Dak, Zeke, Jaylon, Collins, Tapper, Brown, Rico
2021: 6 2017 draftees are resigned at 25% raise over 2017 equivalents.
 
Last edited:

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
In 2019 - I want to sign Everson Griffen, Robert Quin, and Geno Atkins with all that money.

:dance::dance::dance:- if we have extra, throw in Carlos Dunlap and DanielleHunter

Those 5 guys would guarantee a superbowl
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
In 2019 - I want to sign Everson Griffen, Robert Quin, and Geno Atkins with all that money.

:dance::dance::dance:- if we have extra, throw in Carlos Dunlap and DanielleHunter

Those 5 guys would guarantee a superbowl

actually there is no money allotted for top 2019 FAs.
you could do it but you need to sign less of our own FAs in 2020.
i am assuming the most expensive scenario that most of 2016 draftees become good starters/probowlers.
for example if tapper and rico do not work out, you have money for 1 top FA player without having to restart annual rounds of restructuring.
i do assume annual restructuring would resume in 2022 as the big hits from Dak/Zeke/Jaylon arrive - that is of course assuming they become/remain probowlers etc. alternatively, you dont have to restructure as much if at 1-2 of those players are not playing at that level...

also 4 of the 5 you listed would be kind of old - no butter for you!
quinn would be 29
adkins would be 32
giffen would be 33.
dunlap would be 31.

danielle hunter would be 25 but probably locked up like those this year.
 

LocimusPrime

Well-Known Member
Messages
34,091
Reaction score
92,903
actually there is no money allotted for top 2019 FAs.
you could do it but you need to sign less of our own FAs in 2020.
i am assuming the most expensive scenario that most of 2016 draftees become good starters/probowlers.
for example if tapper and rico do not work out, you have money for 1 top FA player without having to restart annual rounds of restructuring.
i do assume annual restructuring would resume in 2022 as the big hits from Dak/Zeke/Jaylon arrive - that is of course assuming they become/remain probowlers etc. alternatively, you dont have to restructure as much if at 1-2 of those players are not playing at that level...

also 4 of the 5 you listed would be kind of old - no butter for you!
quinn would be 29
adkins would be 32
giffen would be 33.
dunlap would be 31.

danielle hunter would be 25 but probably locked up like those this year.
I don't care Waldo....I want those guys!!

Fine can I swap out Atkins for Aaron Donald and Khalil Mack for Griffen?
Let's make it happen
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
I like those FA expenditures but not on TWill and Carr

I wouldn't spend any money on a RT after cutting Free......CGreen is fine by me..... I would spend it on a SDE
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
I like those FA expenditures but not on TWill and Carr

I wouldn't spend any money on a RT after cutting Free......CGreen is fine by me..... I would spend it on a SDE

The model replaces TWill with someone like Jackson or Pryor or someone better than TWill - that is why $12M per year
Carr is replaced with a $12M per year CB - not quite Bouye but someone close - similar to Mo except healthy.

Dont agree on Green. He has the talent but simply cannot stay healthy.

I am just hoping that the FO has made a decision that DE is bad value in FA and going to trade up for a better #1 pick to get a DE - though year 1 of DE rookie is not going to be that good...
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
I don't care Waldo....I want those guys!!

Fine can I swap out Atkins for Aaron Donald and Khalil Mack for Griffen?
Let's make it happen

Like I said, give me the players, # years, aav and signing bonus, and I can tell you whether it can work in the cap.
It is easy to stick it in the model now.
 

Q_the_man

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,931
Reaction score
578
Brandon Williams and Poe. Trade next 2 drafts for Myles Garrett. We would be set on D. We are set on Offense, we need a WR but we still have Dez and Beasley, so a #2 shouldn't be to hard to find. Maybe Brandon Marshall at a discounted rate?
 

Q_the_man

Well-Known Member
Messages
2,931
Reaction score
578
Brandon Williams and Poe. Trade next 2 drafts for Myles Garrett. We would be set on D. We are set on Offense, we need a WR but we still have Dez and Beasley, so a #2 shouldn't be to hard to find. Maybe Brandon Marshall at a discounted rate?
My reasoning behind all this is to win now. we can afford it right now. 3 years from now when Dak is up for a new contract, Willaims and Poe contracts would be coming off the books by then. Normally 4 or 5 year contracts are really 3 year contacts when we sign players as FA's....
 

dwreck27

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,428
Reaction score
6,323
Im failing to see why we need a top FA wr when were already paying for one with Dez??

I think this is a very deep WR draft and we can grab a very decent guy in the 2nd round who can step in and light it up(hopefully a speed guy...also catches with his hands would be nice too ha)

Give me back Carr and church(for the right price) and let everyone else walk... Im not paying an injury plagued Mo, no football smarts Twill, Or a Jag thats gonna get paid in McClain
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Brandon Williams and Poe. Trade next 2 drafts for Myles Garrett. We would be set on D. We are set on Offense, we need a WR but we still have Dez and Beasley, so a #2 shouldn't be to hard to find. Maybe Brandon Marshall at a discounted rate?

Do either Williams or Poe provide much pass rush?
Does Poe have a back issue?

Assuming the next 2 drafts can get Garrett, there are more holes than just Dez.
We have 2 SS, 2 CB also as FAs, and something would have to be done.
So you either need more FAs or you cannot trade the whole draft.

I think 3 top FAs can be done. The RT $ does not really count as a top FA.
So those $ have to be accounted for.
I suspect this much free agency would actually not fit.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Im failing to see why we need a top FA wr when were already paying for one with Dez??

I think this is a very deep WR draft and we can grab a very decent guy in the 2nd round who can step in and light it up(hopefully a speed guy...also catches with his hands would be nice too ha)

Give me back Carr and church(for the right price) and let everyone else walk... Im not paying an injury plagued Mo, no football smarts Twill, Or a Jag thats gonna get paid in McClain

I have 2 reasons.
Dez is in decline and a top WR would protect us from that.
Witten, who is often #2 option, may retire after next year.
I am not sure a 2nd round WR can come in and light it up.
Giants did well with their WR picked in the early 2nd round, but I thought WRs typically need at least one year to do well?

Agree on Mo - just not dependable.

I have a feeling Mcclain will be gone. Mcclain also had some bad years where he could not stay healthy
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
I like those FA expenditures but not on TWill and Carr

I wouldn't spend any money on a RT after cutting Free......CGreen is fine by me..... I would spend it on a SDE

If we resign Carr and T Will I will throw up.
 

Nightman

Capologist
Messages
27,121
Reaction score
24,038
If we resign Carr and T Will I will throw up.
If Carr wants to sign a year to year deal for 2-3m to be CB4 that would be OK

I like TWill but not at 8m..... the draft is loaded at WR and we need to get a couple
 

CowboyRoy

Well-Known Member
Messages
57,924
Reaction score
38,930
If Carr wants to sign a year to year deal for 2-3m to be CB4 that would be OK

I like TWill but not at 8m..... the draft is loaded at WR and we need to get a couple

2-3 Million? Sure. But I think Carr is middle of the pack or lower.

TWill? I am baffled why people even want to resign him. Nothing special at all about the kid. Although I do hear his run blocking is excellent. 8 million is ridiculous to me. I'll be happy if they dont resign him. Sign a veteran for cheap and develop a kid from the draft.
 

Sydla

Well-Known Member
Messages
61,729
Reaction score
95,249
Is everyone on of these types of threads just waldo trying to make the Cowboys front office spend a ton of money on FAs starting this week?

It's not happening.
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
Is everyone on of these types of threads just waldo trying to make the Cowboys front office spend a ton of money on FAs starting this week?

It's not happening.

waldo cannot make the FO do anything.
waldo, however, has done the necessary work to figure out how much meat is left on the bone.
waldo will definitely post about the meat left on the bone
 

waldoputty

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,375
Reaction score
21,163
If Carr wants to sign a year to year deal for 2-3m to be CB4 that would be OK

I like TWill but not at 8m..... the draft is loaded at WR and we need to get a couple

carr is projected at $6M/yr...
 
Top