Yakuza Rich
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 18,043
- Reaction score
- 12,385
The best pet of Brennan's article and the part that shows total disingenuousness was when she talked about how it's not uncommon for an abuse victim to forget something or some small detail and that rationalizes the credibility concerns for the woman.
Yeah Christine, saying Elliott ripped you from a car and hit when multiple witnesses said that's false is simple forgetfulness. Yeah, that's just a small detail that she got wrong.
Brennan is a total putz.
Or Diana Moskovitz claiming that they are resorting to 'slut shaming' Thompson.
Slut shaming would be using Thompson's sexual past against her when it has nothing to do with the case at hand.
No, this is lying to police shaming, witness tampering shaming and extortionist shaming.
It's not about protecting women that have been abused for Brennan and Moskovitz. It's about waging war against the NFL (for Moskovitz) and promoting their pro-female/anti-male beliefs (for Brennan and Moskovitz). All done to bring more attention to themselves.
All this does is make men more skeptical of women that rightfully accuse a man of domestic violence. It's one thing for a woman to falsely accuse a man. There's no way of ever stopping that from happening. But, it's another when people in the media are willfully ignorant to all of the evidence that points to the false accuser lying. That can create such skepticism that men will start to create unreasonable demands towards any accuser.
Brennan and Moskovitz are just as shameful at what they are doing as what the NFL does with trying to play the PR game.
YR

