plasticman
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 10,619
- Reaction score
- 17,761
Fate whispered in Dak's ears, "You cannot withstand the storm."
Dak replied to fate, "I am the storm."
Dak replied to fate, "I am the storm."
Very few people actually want Dak to fail. Though there are the @Risen Star's of the world who'd rather be right in defeat than wrong in victory. Kind of embarrassing really.This article is going to upset some of the Never Dakers in here.
Fate whispered in Dak's ears, "You cannot withstand the storm."
Dak roared back, "I am the storm."
The comparison is interesting, but somewhat apples and oranges.
Who was better? Carr as a rookie? Or Dak as a rookie? In this case, it's no contest.
Carr has made great strides since his rookie year and is now a very good QB. With that said, Dak and Carr are very close right now, without Dak having the benefit of 2 additional years to get better yet. It will be interesting to see where Dak is in 2 years compared to where Carr was last year.
Dak inherited the best offensive personnel in the NFL.
Carr......uh, no.
If the Raiders' offensive personnel (ignoring the QB) is not a match for Dallas', it's close. Many (including the writer of the article that is the subject of this thread) would say Carr's supporting cast is better than Dak's.
You can't dig up, as the saying goes. Perhaps you should consider replacing some of your dogma with reason.
Wow.
Dak inherited the best offensive line in the NFL, the top rusher in the NFL, a Hall of Fame tight end, and a receiving corps that included Dez Bryant, Cole Beasley, and Terrance Williams.
Look at what Carr played with his rookie year. Not even remotely comparable.
Erod is one of those butt hurt Romo fans, just like a few others out there. They hate it that their paper hero never did **** so they're going to destroy any QB that comes in. Who cares?Those GMs would be fools. Dak will be better than Carr.
This article is going to upset some of the Never Dakers in here.
Yeah, if it's a comparison of rookie years, I agree with you. But if we're talking about last year, Carr's supporting cast was at least comparable and many would say better.
Not better than here. Nice offense, but not the run-game machine that is in place here.
And if he didn't get hurt, Carr was very possibly headed for league MVP. He was carrying the load for that offense and playing outstanding.
People ignore this. It isn't a slight against Dak. It's just the truth.Dak inherited the best offensive personnel in the NFL.
Carr......uh, no.
You think this was true 3 years ago when Carr came in as a rookie?If the Raiders' offensive personnel (ignoring the QB) is not a match for Dallas', it's close. Many (including the writer of the article that is the subject of this thread) would say Carr's supporting cast is better than Dak's.
You can't dig up, as the saying goes. Perhaps you should consider replacing some of your dogma with reason.
Not better than here. Nice offense, but not the run-game machine that is in place here.
And if he didn't get hurt, Carr was very possibly headed for league MVP. He was carrying the load for that offense and playing outstanding.
Not sure about the other two, but last season the Raiders had a very easy schedule. They did have to play the Chiefs twice, and Andy beat them both times. Mark my words, they will NOT have the same record this season. For starters, they play the NFCE AND the Pats. We all remember what Foles did to the Raiders in their house.....does 7 ring a bell. Nuff said.Same rule applies to Carr. Last year was his only good year in 3 of them.
2014 - 58.1 comp%, 76.6 qbr.
2015 - 61.1 comp%, 91.1 qbr.
2016 - 63.8 comp%, 96.7 qbr.
You think this was true 3 years ago when Carr came in as a rookie?
Hint: it wasn't.
Wow.
Dak inherited the best offensive line in the NFL, the top rusher in the NFL, a Hall of Fame tight end, and a receiving corps that included Dez Bryant, Cole Beasley, and Terrance Williams.
Look at what Carr played with his rookie year. Not even remotely comparable.
Same rule applies to Carr. Last year was his only good year in 3 of them.
2014 - 58.1 comp%, 76.6 qbr.
2015 - 61.1 comp%, 91.1 qbr.
2016 - 63.8 comp%, 96.7 qbr.
15 and 16 very similarSame rule applies to Carr. Last year was his only good year in 3 of them.
2014 - 58.1 comp%, 76.6 qbr.
2015 - 61.1 comp%, 91.1 qbr.
2016 - 63.8 comp%, 96.7 qbr.