A Dak skeptic upon further review: He played at a high level

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,363
Reaction score
24,224
Yes, old fellow, tha is why I hate to see Dak go long. He does not have spidey sence on coverages.
Dak is at home with short passes.
Dak is lost without the shorter pass and he should stick with tha.
This offense can become highly efficient in a more west coast design.
This doesnt require an overhaul of the current game design, but just taking advantage of certain players skillsets, like Pollard getting the ball in his hands, with some more pass and play action.
This offense already does this, but needs to be more of the staple base offense, fits the entire skillset of this entire offense.
Playing big with multiple TE sets and pounding the rock can become the Cowboys calling card entering post season.
 
  • Like
Reactions: CWR

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,897
Reaction score
17,029
That’s what stinks. If that happens and we get the DPI on Lamb in Green Bay, team is 12-2 and playing for the one seed tomorrow
At least they are still in a good position regardless. The 5 spot could be a good spot for them to be in.
 

rambo2

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,897
Reaction score
17,029
This offense can become highly efficient in a more west coast design.
This doesnt require an overhaul of the current game design, but just taking advantage of certain players skillsets, like Pollard getting the ball in his hands, with some more pass and play action.
This offense already does this, but needs to be more of the staple base offense, fits the entire skillset of this entire offense.
Playing big with multiple TE sets and pounding the rock can become the Cowboys calling card entering post season.
Right now, they are putting up around 40 points game. The offense is good.
 

shabazz

Well-Known Member
Messages
20,085
Reaction score
36,758
BROWN NOSER !!!!!!!!!!

Hes a classic. Hammers player #1 into submission drawing the daggers from player#1 personal fan base and then does a mea culpa to draw them back onto his side again

it’s hilarious to watch the puppeteer work them into a lather
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,911
Reaction score
18,211
This offense can become highly efficient in a more west coast design.
This doesnt require an overhaul of the current game design, but just taking advantage of certain players skillsets, like Pollard getting the ball in his hands, with some more pass and play action.
This offense already does this, but needs to be more of the staple base offense, fits the entire skillset of this entire offense.
Playing big with multiple TE sets and pounding the rock can become the Cowboys calling card entering post season.

Together, we can work it out.
cd7793442d809a2bcddf95856bd9ef4e.png
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,363
Reaction score
24,224
Right now, they are putting up around 40 points game. The offense is good.
Im just looking forward to watching this offense evolve, losing a our starting RT was tough but not without depth.
We feel pretty good about having Peters and Tyron in house right now, but if you look at it, what else has this offense lost at this point that is killing us?
This Offense can manifest into a juggernaut at the right time if Moore plays his cards just right.
Put your playmakers into situations that allow them to make those plays, design around the talent.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,363
Reaction score
24,224
They should match up well in the 1st playoff game.
We better, but think in the first game we can play with them easily just where we are currently, but given a few weeks this entire team will be changing.
That doesnt mean its a bad thing, just have openings available for playmakers currently.
We need to find a few asap.
 

FVSTONE

Well-Known Member
Messages
4,520
Reaction score
3,350
Me fellow frustrated fellows and bland men (a good thing):
I took time from me prank calls and dominos tournament to revisit a highlights video of Cowboys vs. Jags.

Upon further review, Dak turned in a good to very good game. It is clear to see. Passes to Lamb, Brown and even Sequel Elliott made him a highlight reel in itself.

Dak's stats, 23-30/256 yards (save 2 INTs) against the jags are impressive.

Looked crisp. Tough, bulls headfirst into a defensive wall close to a TD. Off the field he is a role model.

Thus, on second look, in the rumination of a vacuous mind, I extend an olive loaf to the Dak lovers, who loyally bear the slings and feathers of the many Dak skeptics. They exemplifiy fealty of true fans, some of whom see the star and withhold valid complaint.

But on the same token, as Dak impressed this keen eye I thought to meself, but what about crunch time.
That, me hale, misguided Dak lovers, is what worries me.

Me dudes and the ambiguous, I and the Dak detractors need to see a leadership and decisiveness come crunch time.

Mateys, on Sunday, a holy day, I saw Dak throwing TDs at each end of the end zone, running for a first down and bulling his way near the end zone.
But short.
I respect Dak, hale men, but against the Egirls I expect an "A" game.

If he plays a good game yet doesn't take his team over the line, it is fair to question Dak's cumulative gain to the Cowboys.
It is tha simple. Get over into tha end zone now and in tha playoffs.
1052144420.jpeg

Hollah
Once again, the Prescot stats are over hyped and overrated! This dude doesn't have the abilities to put together a decent game for 15 minutes, let alone 60 minutes. He's one of those QBs who we expect to implode and he does every game!
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,911
Reaction score
18,211
Once again, the Prescot stats are over hyped and overrated! This dude doesn't have the abilities to put together a decent game for 15 minutes, let alone 60 minutes. He's one of those QBs who we expect to implode and he does every game!

Did I not question Dak's grit at crunch time?

Move over, stout fellow, and let me co-sign what you wrote.

But me metaphysical post focused on ONE very good game by Dak and Co. in which ONE of 2 picks ended it for us.
My judgment is the jury is still out on whetheer he can run to and CROSS into the end zone.

But, it is odd to me how the D seems to be absolved in all of this, you know, the D run by the genus Quinn.
 

TheMarathonContinues

Well-Known Member
Messages
85,471
Reaction score
77,734
Moores failures have always been staying with what is already working well, he struggles with conservatism and designs a game plan based on homerun hits being used in the worst times during game.
It's fine to be aggressive most of the game, but there are moments when a more dialed down script is Moore appropriate.
He literally went away from what was working in the game. I wish I understood the madness behind but I just don't unless he wants to get fired. That's all I can think of.
 

Typhus

Captain Catfish
Messages
21,363
Reaction score
24,224
He literally went away from what was working in the game. I wish I understood the madness behind but I just don't unless he wants to get fired. That's all I can think of.
He doesnt want to get fired but I get the sarcasm and humor.
Moore gets nervous and stupid, that's the only basic diagnosis I can come up with.
Why deviate from a 75 percent completion rate play like a screen to Pollard when backed up near you end zone on third and long rather than deap outs to everyone?
This is some basic errors that Romo used to even overrule and change Garretts lame play design in the huddle often.
Dak has some game, but Moore believes he can elevate Daks game further, but that is the failure.
Wish Dak would play some Romo ball in the huddle and tell Moore to eat it by doing so.
Dak knows who he is I believe, but Moore is expecting entirely too much and Dak plays right into it.
 

ccb04

Well-Known Member
Messages
996
Reaction score
672
If the defense doesn't pull their collective heads out of their you know what's, Dak threads nor anything else, will matter.

In the Green Bay and Jags losses, the defense gave up a combined: 65 points & 919 yards of total offense. The offense in those 2 games managed: 62 points & 818 yards of total offense. As far as turnovers: Green Bay had 3 turnovers to the Cowboys 2 ... and the Jags also had 3 turnovers to the Cowboys 2. The defense also yielded Lawrence's first 4 TD game of his career, and were torched for 3 TD's by an inconsistent rookie receiver in Green Bay, while also giving up 207 yards rushing.
 

RonnieT24

Well-Known Member
Messages
14,532
Reaction score
22,951
You out yourself as clueless.
Any conventional throw begins with two TWO feet planted.
Yes, the throw does depend on torque and power from one foot.

But throwing off one foot with the other off the ground while moving is something you'd do at your mens touch football game, not the pros.
Blomey, learn basics at least.:rolleyes:


So let me get this straight.. You are arguing that throwing on the run begins with two feet planted? Why don't you produce me some video of these two feet planted throws on the move... I don't all humans run with their feet planted? Never lifting them off the ground, instead using sheer power to spin the Earth beneath them to move forward. I'm sure you can find examples of this "basic" technique.. I'll wait.

This should be fun.
 

cnuball21

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,330
Reaction score
10,176
Once again, the Prescot stats are over hyped and overrated! This dude doesn't have the abilities to put together a decent game for 15 minutes, let alone 60 minutes. He's one of those QBs who we expect to implode and he does every game!

You seem like a very knowledgeable poster that really knows his stuff.

What QB in your opinion can put together a decent game for 60 minutes?
 

GimmeTheBall!

Junior College Transfer
Messages
37,911
Reaction score
18,211
So let me get this straight.. You are arguing that throwing on the run begins with two feet planted? Why don't you produce me some video of these two feet planted throws on the move... I don't all humans run with their feet planted? Never lifting them off the ground, instead using sheer power to spin the Earth beneath them to move forward. I'm sure you can find examples of this "basic" technique.. I'll wait.

This should be fun.
Dear robust fellow, throwing on the run should not be on the table for Dak.

Where have you been?

Get a tutorial, T, on the optimum passing stance.
2 feet firmly on the ground, one to stabilize, one to provide torque.
Your throwing on the run works for Mahomes-like QBs, not Dak.

You can go now.
 
Top