zrinkill
Cowboy Fan
- Messages
- 49,043
- Reaction score
- 32,549
OkCowboyFan;1187815 said:I want my report to be understood by even the most simpletons hence my request for your email. JK.
:laugh2:
Dang ...... Owned by the new kid!
OkCowboyFan;1187815 said:I want my report to be understood by even the most simpletons hence my request for your email. JK.
:laugh2:
LaTunaNostra;1187674 said:Possibly the longest ever but grammatically sound...I have inserted the names of the syntactical items that allow this sentence to be both run-on and correct.
These are all my honest opinions because (subordinator introducing dependent clause) I, like most, want to believe that the search is finally over and so (coordinating conjunction followed by subordinating conjunction - allowing for the introduction of both a compound sentence containing another complex clause)I digest stats and look for the negatives and positives and when (coordinating conjunction followed craftily with a time clause adverbial) I find the positives I like to share them because (subordinator introducing another dependent clause) I know the negatives as much as the next fan but (coordinating conjunction creating another compound) really think with this QB and the potential of our offense (introduction of noun clause with omitted 'that'..perfectly permissible) it is now time to concentrate on the positives.
This sentence is actually a well constructed complex-compound-complex- compound-complex-complex-compound-complex.
It's also notable that commas were optional except in the very place where the poster used his two.
OKCF, don't mind us.
And great post!
calcbfan1;1187865 said:Nice job grammar cops, you ruined a perfectly good thread, again.