Hawkeye0202
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 29,775
- Reaction score
- 53,541
Mazi Smith?????
And has been proven on the field so far.I said it back then…no idea how these people had Young over Stroud or Levis in round 1.
it happens every year and then the crystal balls come out. Strout had questions about him back then. and if you forgot, people put darnold ahead of Allen, Rosen ahead of Jackson, Turbiskey ahead of Mahomes.I said it back then…no idea how these people had Young over Stroud or Levis in round 1.
Definitely but I wouldn't write off Young just yet. He played better the last half of the season. There's still hope at least, which is all I want as a Cowboys fan.And has been proven on the field so far.
True but then we also hear on this board all the time about how “well scouts get paid for this so they know better than you” and “I trust the front office as they know more than rando poster here” which is perplexing to me as I have been here a long long time and every year watched some posters here have consistently better mock drafts than 32 NFL paid scouting teams….it happens every year and then the crystal balls come out. Strout had questions about him back then. and if you forgot, people put darnold ahead of Allen, Rosen ahead of Jackson, Turbiskey ahead of Mahomes.
you can do this exact same excercise for every draft year.
Mazi Smith?????
Please stop embarrassing yourselfTrue but then we also hear on this board all the time about how “well scouts get paid for this so they know better than you” and “I trust the front office as they know more than rando poster here” which is perplexing to me as I have been here a long long time and every year watched some posters here have consistently better mock drafts than 32 NFL paid scouting teams….
I agree. There are a lot of players who did not go where the draft experts rated them and some who have not performed up to that level. What would interest me is where teams had them rated compared to where they go.It shows that everyone on that chart and their rankings. Really are not that good of talent evaluators.
It would be great to see what each teams big board was like. Yes, some of it is based on need rather they admit it or not.
As they put together the big board based on the coaches schemes and styles as well.
Very good point.And people still get mad when we don't pick "Todd's Best Available" every year. SMH
I think this year was an exception to that. We just drafted a DE high (second round) in last year's draft. Donovan EZ was a value pick instead of forced pick. I had needs I thought we should address, but could not argue with the value.As of now, this draft is the perfect example of how they shoot themselves in the foot with their strategy.
They expect to have 2-3 immediate starters and force having to take certain positions. Whatever doesn’t happen in the first round becomes a must in the second.
That’s how you end up with Kelvin Joseph and Luke Schoonmaker with premium picks.
Scouting is such an inexact science that it basically borders on pseudo-science, or complete fantasy.True but then we also hear on this board all the time about how “well scouts get paid for this so they know better than you” and “I trust the front office as they know more than rando poster here” which is perplexing to me as I have been here a long long time and every year watched some posters here have consistently better mock drafts than 32 NFL paid scouting teams….
Mazi Smith?????
Darnold is better than Allenit happens every year and then the crystal balls come out. Strout had questions about him back then. and if you forgot, people put darnold ahead of Allen, Rosen ahead of Jackson, Turbiskey ahead of Mahomes.
you can do this exact same excercise for every draft year.