This team would be nuts to draft a freaking LB as the 4th overall pick!!.I like Jack but in no way is he worth the 4th pick,he is not even the best LB in the draft and he has ton of question marks.
The huge difference is Luke played with a torn labrum, and Davis played with a broken arm. Don't forget about those types of things!!!
So if he is a Day One starter and perennial Pro Bowler with 5 INTs a year, that still wouldn't be enough to warrant a 4th round pick?
4th round? Sure.
Greedy much?
So if he is a Day One starter and perennial Pro Bowler with 5 INTs a year, that still wouldn't be enough to warrant a 4th round pick?
Here the kicker,
I believe all LBers drafted in 2002 and before that are also retired. Get that? ALL of them!!!
That is a big thing.
They would be more snaps because they would be better players, in general not in all cases, and part of being a better player in Football and LB is giving it 100% and throwing caution to the wind which can result in more injuries especially when you are going against RBs that sometimes have a head of steam, Sometimes going against TE's that are bigger and of course working through blocks of OLinemen to get in the backfield.
I hope the moral of the story is not to pass up on good LBs and only take mediocre to crappy LBs in the draft at lower spots so they can stay healthy longer in the NFL even if that means they don't get as much snaps and do not create as much impact.
Good LBs play hard and get injured more than a little.
News at 11
So if he is a Day One starter and perennial Pro Bowler with 5 INTs a year, that still wouldn't be enough to warrant a 4th round pick?
Love the "if" game.
Are we trending to LB's have same NFL shelf life as RB's?