bull.
rodgers comes up short...time and again.
brady doesn't.
montana didn't.
staubach didn't.
if he's so damn great....elevate your team instead of the excuses as you knife your coach in the back.
he is a fraud.
any other qb goes 0-4 in nfc title games post super bowl win would get roasted.
but the whorish love affair with green bay qbs continues.
he knifed mccarthy.
doing the same to the young'n.
yet as a starting qb...he is 0-4 post super bowl.
he and his sick cult need to own it.
It's like you ignored my entire original post.
He literally plays better than Brady. He comes up short because his supporting casts aren't nearly as good.
Brady having top 5-10 D's doesn't make him better then a player who statistically destroys him.
Are you really saying Bradys far inferior play elevated his team more then Rodgers far superior play? Of course not. Bradys supporting casts are just way better and negate his inferior play in comparison to Rodgers.
Rodgers would have more rings then Brady if he had Bradys supporting casts/cheating scandals/perennial too 5-10 Ds. We judge players by how good they play, not how good their team plays. Bradshaw is not better than Marino lol.
The whole point is that Rodgers plays better and Brady only wins more rings because his teams are significantly better, so just repeating that Brady had more rings isn't an argument.