The first drive, four runs and two passes and a field goal.
The drive after that, Dallas throws 4 times and 2 run for FG
The drive after that, Dallas throws 3 times and 1 run for a TD.
The next drive after that, Dallas threw 8 times out of 8 possessions.
13-3 Dallas is up. 7 plays, Dallas throws the ball 5 of those times to get a field goal.
Dallas up 16-3, three passing formations followed by a field goal
Let's actually go to when Dallas was up 19-3 in the first half. 6 plays and 4 times Romo throws the ball, one of those passes a short pass to Murray. They score a TD on the last run. They ran once the first drive of that series.
If you look at the third quarter, it was essentially the same trend. 5 run plays and 7 throws. They only got a field goal from 50 yards out. The next drive, Dez got a TD on 6 straight passes, started by two runs with Murray.
The real issue of this game is Dallas was settling for field goals. By half-time, Dallas should have been well into their thirties, considering how bad they were playing. So is Garrett to get credit for th first half, but not the second half. Well guess what, we weren't a phenomenon of offesive wonder in the first half either. But don't even tell me it's Garrett considering our TDs were essentially because of drag routes by Dez and passes up the seams to Witten, all routes we NEVER ran when garrett was in charge.
The idea that all they had to do was run and punt isn't really true. The problem was, they made is incredibly easy for Green Bay to defend them. Whatevr formations they were bringing out in he second half in particular, weren't fooling Green Bay one bit. That play Beasley was intercepted on was with nobody in the backfield. How can Romo audible out of that?