Finally got around to reviewing the all-22 and I'll give my thoughts.
Hitchens was pretty solid in the game. He could be stronger, but the game is not too big for him. He seems to read things fairly quickly for being a rookie. He runs well enough.
To be honest I'm a little disappointed in Melton so far. He gets blown out in the run game, sometimes not even on double teams. He does at times get some push in the pass rush. They need him to play better.
I like Bishop. He is pretty raw but I could see him becoming a starter quality player. Same way I feel about Hitchens. Of course Hitchens isn't as raw.
I thought Wilcox played all right. I think he still has a chance to be a good player. He is physical and aggressive. He needs to work on coverage, but physically he's capable. Not disappointed with him at this stage at all.
OK. On the whole cornerback thing, Claiborne after review wasn't as bad as I thought. Carr got picked on a few times as well. Had a few passes been on target, Carr could have easily been the goat of the game. He was beaten. The quarterback just didn't hit the receiver. Also, Carr gave up a few passes of the 20-yard variety. I think putting Scandrick in for Claiborne in base makes sense, because Scandrick is a better tackler, better against the run, etc. That is important in this scheme. However, Claiborne IMO is still a pretty solid cover corner and capable of turning into a good player. (he has excellent quickness to break on balls he just has to see things faster I think). I have most confidence in Claiborne covering an elite receive above Scandrick or Carr. I'm sure many may disagree. Anyway my point, not time to give up on Claiborne at all I think. It will be interesting how it plays out. We need him to play well. Carr and Scandrick are not shut down corners.
I like Crawford and interested to see him play on the inside.
With a defense that pursues well. Murray sometimes needs to find cutback lanes. He didn't always do that well in the game. As the game went along he had a few good cutback runs.
I think Randle while physically less impressive than Murray has good instincts for finding the right hole. I would like to see him continue to get chances. The sample size is small, but he just seems to have a knack for running to the right place.