Dylan88Wilson
Well-Known Member
- Messages
- 1,132
- Reaction score
- 2,147
And I don’t understand why we took a James Hanna replacement over Maurice Hurst.
At the moment we are replacing both Hanna and Witten. Schultz isn’t the ultimate answer - won’t be a standout - but he should be a solid all around TE that will help immediatelyAnd I don’t understand why we took a James Hanna replacement over Maurice Hurst.
Covington over Cichy is going to bother me for a while.
I'll be honest, I kind of side stepped that one cause I don't know what to think. I've had a man crush on Austin as a player for a long time, I think he's a really talented dude that just got screwed over by Jeff Fisher, and I think he can be our new Lance Dunbar and our new Lucky Whitehead right away. The problem is that I don't know if I want to take on a $5 million contract for a bit player. I mean, $6 million a year got us Allen Hurns.
Great point, this guy had over 5oo yards of offense in games in College, WR,RB,PR,KR, this guy can play.You can add Austin to this draft class since we used a 6th to trade for him. Think that should be considered when grading the class...
And when a team is worn down from Zeke and the OL , you put him in and he can take the ball all the way.I think he will also have a big impact on special teams. That will make it a little easier to stomach that contract.
1. A for the player, A for the selection
2, A and A
3. B and C but can upgrade once I think about it and see him in TC
4. C and F
4. B and D
5. C and C, was a D, at first didn’t like the pick, but the old theory of drafting a QB every year may apply here
6. A for the trade to get Austin.
6. C and B, becasue we needed LB depth
6. B and D becasue we did not need to go WR
7. B and C as not sure we needed to go RB and offense yet again. But then again who else was there to get.
Also an A for the trade of Switzer for Ward. Not sure if it was good or bad, but we got rid of an over abundance of a WR for a much needed DT.
Over all for the draft C.
Which one? Scarborough? I was floored when I saw his name pop up and just assumed he was long gone as I wasn't watching past Friday night. I don't know what teams don't like about him. 1st day pick? No but that OL he ran behind, including the TE, couldn't carry the jock straps of the one Henry had.Draft feels more like a B or B- overall to me.None of the picks were really homeruns, with one being a potential steal.
Ok, so WHO is going to be our return man? The Switz move was plain *** stupid. The clapping moron and his vanilla OC never used this kid to his potential...just iurger for a 4th rounder... ignorance on all sides. We got a nothing burger for a 4th rndr... great draft JJ you idiot.
Which one? Scarborough? I was floored when I saw his name pop up and just assumed he was long gone as I wasn't watching past Friday night. I don't know what teams don't like about him. 1st day pick? No but that OL he ran behind, including the TE, couldn't carry the jock straps of the one Henry had.
That's a pretty heavy put down, the RB of the national champs going that late, hope he comes with a lot of attitude.
And which of those 2 have EVER got under a punt or kick off in the NFL??? Oh that's right neither of em... this ought to be rich, prime time watching the clown show.the WR Thompson and / or Tavon Austin
Love how some of you guys give a pick the grade of D or F because you haven't scouted him or know his name....... Haha that has to be the most silly reasoning I have ever heard.
Thompson returned a KO for a TD against the Cowboys while with the Ravens.And which of those 2 have EVER got under a punt or kick off in the NFL??? Oh that's right neither of em... this ought to be rich, prime time watching the clown show.
And which of those 2 have EVER got under a punt or kick off in the NFL??? Oh that's right neither of em... this ought to be rich, prime time watching the clown show.