All that matters is winning

[kskboys]

Runny, I agree. I just do not get why Dak is beyond reproach. I praise guys when they deserve it and ridicule guys when they deserve it. I'm pretty even keeled about it.

Because you're focusing your efforts on the ones who praise/defend Dak no matter what. Focus your efforts on the good posters on this site, and your problem concerning this matter will cease to exist.

 

[TequilaCowboy]

Bring on the freaking bears.....need to have that one to go 6-2 into the bye.

 

[boysfanperiod]

Because you're focusing your efforts on the ones who praise/defend Dak no matter what. Focus your efforts on the good posters on this site, and your problem concerning this matter will cease to exist.

Good advice, ksk. Duly noted.

 

[HungryLion]

I am so sorry that you thought my post was ambitious. I do believe I may post anywhere on the site as long as it is within the guidelines, correct? Is Dak not part of the team?

Technically staying on topic is part of the guidelines.


Regardless I pointed out it wasn’t a Dak thread and you decided to attack that by calling it stupid. So you got a respond in kind.

 

[Runwildboys]

Runny, I agree. I just do not get why Dak is beyond reproach. I praise guys when they deserve it and ridicule guys when they deserve it. I'm pretty even keeled about it.

Oh I know, that's how I've always taken you. Just to be clear, I wasn't being sarcastic when I asked if you meant to say "blame". The way your post was written out, I thought you were saying it wasn't all on him that it was an "ugly" win.

 

[boysfanperiod]

Technically staying on topic is part of the guidelines.

Yes. I did stay on topic. The topic is "All that matter is winning." I said it was "an ugly win." You just choose to see the Dak part. Read the whole post. Dak is not the reason we won today.

 

[HungryLion]

Yes. I did stay on topic. The topic is "All that matter is winning." I said it was "an ugly win." You just choose to see the Dak part. Read the whole post.

Listen. All I did was point out that that the thread isn’t supposed to be about Dak. Then you attacked that by calling it stupid. So you got the same response back. Period

And no you didn’t stay on topic because it’s not a thread about Dak hype.

 

[Runwildboys]

1. Maybe you should specify that next time. Yes it was hard to understand because….. you didn’t actually say that. You just made a reference to “hype”

2. Maybe you should save that for a Dak thread and not one that isn’t about Dak. It would be easier to not read it if it was in one of the numerous Dak argument threads where it belongs.

It's just a misunderstanding. You're both good, fair minded posters.

 

[HungryLion]

It's just a misunderstanding. You're both good, fair minded posters.

It’s nothing personal. Just clarifying.

 

[Rockport]

It was an ugly win. However, Dak does not deserve all the hype. Period.

He’s not getting all the hype. He had a solid game and worked off some rust. I guess you don’t want him to get any credit. Why?

 

[boysfanperiod]

Oh I know, that's how I've always taken you. Just to be clear, I wasn't being sarcastic when I asked if you meant to say "blame". The way your post was written out, I thought you were saying it wasn't all on him that it was an "ugly" win.

Thanks runny. I don't blame Dak for anything. I just don't think his talking matched with his walking today. Next, week I expect a better showing. I will leave it to rust. I have not completely given up on him. Apparently, my post was not clear. All well.

 

[CowboysFaninHouston]

It was an ugly win. However, Dak does not deserve all the hype. Period.

actually it wasn't ugly. one of the best offenses in the league was held to 6 points, no TDs and we had 4 turnovers. nice win.

 

[Runwildboys]

It’s nothing personal. Just clarifying.

It was starting to sound pretty personal. If I'm being honest, it kinda seemed like you were already angry with other posters when you replied.

 

[Runwildboys]

actually it wasn't ugly. one of the best offenses in the league was held to 6 points, no TDs and we had 4 turnovers. nice win.

It was an ugly offensive outing in the first half.

 

[boysfanperiod]

He’s not getting all the hype. He had a solid game and worked off some rust. I guess you don’t want him to get any credit. Why?

I said he does not deserve "all" the hype. The defense deserves some of the hype for the way they played. ST deserves some hype for the way they played. The RBs played well. Zeke looked really good. I never said he did not deserve hype. I said he did not deserve all of it for the win. His effort was pedestrian at best. What level of hype do you think he deserves? So I can make sure I post it according to your specifications.

 

[HungryLion]

It was starting to sound pretty personal. If I'm being honest, it kinda seemed like you were already angry with other posters when you replied.

To be honest I am kind of sick of all the back and forth about the QB at this point. Which is why I tend to stay out of Dak threads anymore and only make relatively neutral comments if I do decide to go into one.

 

[Rockport]

I said he does not deserve "all" the hype. The defense deserves some of the hype for the way they played. ST deserves some hype for the way they played. The RBs played well. Zeke looked really good. I never said he did not deserve hype. I said he did not deserve all of it for the win. His effort was pedestrian at best. What level of hype do you think he deserves? So I can make sure I post it according to your specifications.

I don’t see any hype he’s getting other than playing solid and knocking some rust off. What’s wrong with that?

 

[boysfanperiod]

To be honest I am kind of sick of all the back and forth about the QB at this point. Which is why I tend to stay out of Dak threads anymore and only make relatively neutral comments if I do decide to go into one.

HL, just for the record, I don't have any problems with you at all. We saw things differently. That's all.

 

[boysfanperiod]

I don’t see any hype he’s getting other than playing solid and knocking some rust off. What’s wrong with that?

Nothing is wrong with that. What do you mean solid? Do you think the first half was good? Put the anointing oil away.

 

[Runwildboys]

To be honest I am kind of sick of all the back and forth about the QB at this point. Which is why I tend to stay out of Dak threads anymore and only make relatively neutral comments if I do decide to go into one.

I know, you've always been level headed. I tend to avoid the "Dak vs. ?" threads, and when a thread inevitably turns into one, I tire of it quickly. But when someone's being honest with their opinion about how Dak performed, in regard to the thread, I don't have a problem with it.