Ambiguity works in business but NOT as an NFL GM

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,394
Reaction score
72,407
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
If there was one word in the annual non-sensical scrabble word salad from our owner/president/GM/faceofthefranchise yesterday it was “Ambiguity”. Maybe we will maybe we won’t. Who knows what’s going to happen. Etc, etc. We’ve been hearing Jerry brave about his comfort with that word for decades. The same decades we’ve been waiting for something more than a wild card win.

Main point here: Ambiguity works well for business leaders. It does NOT work well for GMs of football teams.
Why ambiguity is bad for a GM:

  • Effective GMs- the ones winning playoff games consistently - do their homework and know EXACTLY what they want to do going into an off-season. You know who you want to sign, for how much, and when the deadline is to get it done. Have a plan and execute it.
  • In the layout of the NFL contractual landscape, waiting is losing. Especially if you want to save money. We already know what Cedee Lamb will cost. Nothing less than $35 mil per. Period. No ambiguity there.
  • If you’re NOT SURE you like your head coach, then you don’t like him enough. Fire him rather than wasting a season with someone you are lukewarm about. Same for your starting QB, and every other key position on the team.
KEY IDEAS: Do your research, know what you want and then do it. If you aren't sure you like your HC or your starting QB, or any other “expensive” or key ingredient to your team, you’ve already made your decision.

Ambiguity is cancerous to a football team that wants to win a championship.
We head into the 2024 season with a GM that isn’t sure he likes the HC, the QB, maybe the team’s best offensive weapon and WR or his uber-talented 25 year old defensive star.

Thats fine if you want to get rid of all of them. It’s just that that decision should have already been made. There is nothing to be ambiguous about. Unless you are comfortable throwing away whole seasons.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,394
Reaction score
72,407
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Jerry’s ego trip has to run its course.

It won’t be that much longer. The comments are getting worse each time and that will continue. Watch and see.
I think we fans have become like the proverbial frog in the boiling pot. We are so used to this constant nonsense coming from the GM/owner we just see it as normal.

Imagine a GM in this league having to deal with multiple public trials about a fun baby he fathered 30 years ago. Trials that did not allow him to get to TC on time. It would be big news and perhaps cost someone their job. Especially if that GM got blown out at home to a 7 seed last January.
 

zrinkill

Cowboy Fan
Messages
49,007
Reaction score
32,474
CowboysZone LOYAL Fan
Jerry’s ego trip has to run its course.

It won’t be that much longer. The comments are getting worse each time and that will continue. Watch and see.
God I hope so ........ his ego is the only thing you can hurt him with to force change ........ hopefully the crowds will start booing him every time he shows his plastic face, instead of asking for autographs.
 

stiletto

Well-Known Member
Messages
11,367
Reaction score
14,883
I actually think this is the most we've seen Jerry change since he brought in Parcells. Not paying ridiculous overpriced/overrated players is a good idea, actually.. let them win some playoff games to get their $$... we'll see how that works out.
 

jazzcat22

Staff member
Messages
80,584
Reaction score
101,222
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I am one of the few that still does not see what is wrong by allowing MM coach his final year of his contract.

What are owners supposed to do, extend the HC every time he has one year left on his contract.
what if he gave him a 2 year extension or longer. Then they fail Then fans will be on him for keeping him. Why would an owner throw away money if he were to extend him, then fire him.

Let him play out the contract as he did with Garrett. Then actually he would not be fired. His contract ended. And Jerry decides to go in another direction.
 

Flamma

Well-Known Member
Messages
24,115
Reaction score
20,689
If there was one word in the annual non-sensical scrabble word salad from our owner/president/GM/faceofthefranchise yesterday it was “Ambiguity”. Maybe we will maybe we won’t. Who knows what’s going to happen. Etc, etc. We’ve been hearing Jerry brave about his comfort with that word for decades. The same decades we’ve been waiting for something more than a wild card win.

Main point here: Ambiguity works well for business leaders. It does NOT work well for GMs of football teams.
Why ambiguity is bad for a GM:

  • Effective GMs- the ones winning playoff games consistently - do their homework and know EXACTLY what they want to do going into an off-season. You know who you want to sign, for how much, and when the deadline is to get it done. Have a plan and execute it.
  • In the layout of the NFL contractual landscape, waiting is losing. Especially if you want to save money. We already know what Cedee Lamb will cost. Nothing less than $35 mil per. Period. No ambiguity there.
  • If you’re NOT SURE you like your head coach, then you don’t like him enough. Fire him rather than wasting a season with someone you are lukewarm about. Same for your starting QB, and every other key position on the team.
KEY IDEAS: Do your research, know what you want and then do it. If you aren't sure you like your HC or your starting QB, or any other “expensive” or key ingredient to your team, you’ve already made your decision.

Ambiguity is cancerous to a football team that wants to win a championship.
We head into the 2024 season with a GM that isn’t sure he likes the HC, the QB, maybe the team’s best offensive weapon and WR or his uber-talented 25 year old defensive star.

Thats fine if you want to get rid of all of them. It’s just that that decision should have already been made. There is nothing to be ambiguous about. Unless you are comfortable throwing away whole seasons.
If this team was only about winning, they would supplement the roster with free agents. Signing Henry or Barkley is something Jerry would have done decades ago. It's not what they do now. Their current standard operating procedure is not serious about being a SB contender.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,394
Reaction score
72,407
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
I am one of the few that still does not see what is wrong by allowing MM coach his final year of his contract.

What are owners supposed to do, extend the HC every time he has one year left on his contract.
what if he gave him a 2 year extension or longer. Then they fail Then fans will be on him for keeping him. Why would an owner throw away money if he were to extend him, then fire him.

Let him play out the contract as he did with Garrett. Then actually he would not be fired. His contract ended. And Jerry decides to go in another direction.
This is a perfect example of what works in the business world doesn’t always work in sports. Almost all pro sports organizations don’t leave a coach hanging in a “prove it” year. If you think he’s a good HC, extend him. If you aren’t sure, fire him. The odds of this “motivating” anyone to play or coach better is slim to none. Believing in someone enough to extend them is motivating. Acting ambiguous is detrimental to team confidence.

Leaving a HC in the last year of his deal as a win/lose proposition has been tried 3 other times in the Jerry era. Wade in 2010, Garrett in 2014 and Garrett again in 2019. In two of those 3 situations the Cowboys did not make the playoffs. I don’t like those odds.

The reason why most sane organizations don’t put their HC in this position is it sends the wrong message to the wrong people. If you are “ambiguous“ about who/what you want, you’ve already made a bad decision.
 

Bullflop

Cowboys Diehard
Messages
25,629
Reaction score
30,846
Jerry just likes to use the word ambiguity -- it makes him feel smart. DUH, look at me, I'm ambiguous!! Yuck, yuck! :grin:
 
Last edited:

CowboyFrog

Well-Known Member
Messages
12,334
Reaction score
11,286
This is a perfect example of what works in the business world doesn’t always work in sports. Almost all pro sports organizations don’t leave a coach hanging in a “prove it” year. If you think he’s a good HC, extend him. If you aren’t sure, fire him. The odds of this “motivating” anyone to play or coach better is slim to none. Believing in someone enough to extend them is motivating. Acting ambiguous is detrimental to team confidence.

Leaving a HC in the last year of his deal as a win/lose proposition has been tried 3 other times in the Jerry era. Wade in 2010, Garrett in 2024 and Garrett again in 2019. In two of those 3 situations the Cowboys did not make the playoffs. I don’t like those odds.

The reason why most sane organizations don’t put their HC in this position is it sends the wrong message to the wrong people. If you are “ambiguous“ about who/what you want, you’ve already made a bad decision.
You see it for what it is, this isnt Jerry changing this is Jerry not having anymore cards to play and his options are few and he has/had no plan for this. Who knows what 2025 will bring but the one thing it will not bring is a GM who has to take accountablitiy for 2024..AND thats what this Franchise desperatley needs.
 

ShortRound

Well-Known Member
Messages
23,986
Reaction score
83,265
Who is telling the owner of the richest sports franchise on planet earth, he's doing it wrong?

We're gonna have to wait for any hope of change.
 

Bobhaze

Staff member
Messages
18,394
Reaction score
72,407
CowboysZone ULTIMATE Fan
Who is telling the owner of the richest sports franchise on planet earth, he's doing it wrong?

We're gonna have to wait for any hope of change.
Well many of us on here are telling him, lol. But he surrounds himself with an entourage of sycophants and suck ups. It’s a job requirement. Jerry would rather lose than not do things the way he wants. So when he says he would “do anything to win a Super Bowl again”, he’s lying.
 
Top