Amendola released

giphy.gif
Yeah, but I don't think these turnovers are cherry :laugh:
 
You can find guys like Beasley in every round of the draft including UDFA's. Dallas found Beasley and they don't cost very much for the first few years.
Be patient as we will have 90 players for camp to be sure.
 
Amendola was fine last year. His deal was a 1 yet deal with a 2nd year option. Dolphins are planning to suck to rebuild so no need to keep a 34 year old receiver
 
I wouldn’t lose one second of sleep worrying about how to replace Beasley. I’d move on cheaply at that position and wisely invest my money where you can witness the fruits of how it was spent.

Don’t misunderstand me, I like Beasley at his old price tag, but in a bang-for-buck league, the second you have to pay sizeable contracts to guys like him and Hitchens last year, you walk away with a smile on your face knowing you played that process correctly and milked every bit of decent production from a small contract as long as you could. Duplicate that in someone new, and don’t EVER overpay for it.

If Amendola is a one year, low risk insurance policy to finding that guy, that’s fine by me. The mistake would be overpaying for a slot when history says you don’t have to.
 
It may seem like Amendola’s release depresses the market for slot guys. But keep in mind it also adds Miami to the list of teams that will be looking for a new guy. Supply and demand both go up together.
 
If I'm going to pay more than 8 mil a year for a slot WR his last name better be Humphries
 
If I'm going to pay more than 8 mil a year for a slot WR his last name better be Humphries

Humphries would be nice to have but not sure we're the team to pay what he'd want. I'm seeing a draft pick as a likely option for us.
 
I wouldn’t lose one second of sleep worrying about how to replace Beasley. I’d move on cheaply at that position and wisely invest my money where you can witness the fruits of how it was spent.

Don’t misunderstand me, I like Beasley at his old price tag, but in a bang-for-buck league, the second you have to pay sizeable contracts to guys like him and Hitchens last year, you walk away with a smile on your face knowing you played that process correctly and milked every bit of decent production from a small contract as long as you could. Duplicate that in someone new, and don’t EVER overpay for it.

If Amendola is a one year, low risk insurance policy to finding that guy, that’s fine by me. The mistake would be overpaying for a slot when history says you don’t have to.

This sounds like the replace-Dez strategy.

Just pay Cole.
 
Beasley’s price keeps going down.

Humphries, Crowder, Amendola
I disagree, if you happen to think that any of these guys is better at this point than Beasley than maybe you are correct but if not than it brings 3 more teams into play to potentially sign Beasley if he becomes a FA, i think moves like these by other teams will only drive up his price
 
Sure, let's bring in another guy that's hurt all the time. :thumbdown:
 
Maybe we should look at more of a cooper kupp type in the slot....
Bigger body that just finds open spots in the d
 
I disagree, if you happen to think that any of these guys is better at this point than Beasley than maybe you are correct but if not than it brings 3 more teams into play to potentially sign Beasley if he becomes a FA, i think moves like these by other teams will only drive up his price

Not stating Amendola is better by any means whatsoever.

Just simply saying, a team may not want to shell out a 4 year, 40 million deal worth 10 a year. They could get Amendola for two years and half of that.

Just depends on their long term plans and cap space.

Beasley is solid. I’d put him equal to Crowder and below Humphries. Way above Amendola
 

Staff online

Forum statistics

Threads
474,010
Messages
14,506,445
Members
24,207
Latest member
TomGiantsfan
Back
Top